The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 05:42, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Belize at major beauty pageants (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication that this set of data is notable per WP:GNG or WP:LISTN. Seems like an WP:INDISCRIMINATE collection of information. JBchrch talk 00:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. JBchrch talk 00:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belize-related deletion discussions. JBchrch talk 00:48, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment This AfD came out of an ANI discussion about several similar pages created by Kannweame7961 (talk · contribs), which was originally concerned about MOS:COLOUR violations. There are 121 other articles of this kind, which are listed at Template:Countries at major beauty pageants and Category:Nations at beauty pageants. I would recommend going through those other articles if this AfD closes as delete. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:12, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 05:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Insignificant subject. NavjotSR (talk) 16:01, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree with nom, doesn't appear to be notable. LaundryPizza03 raises a good point in what should be done with the rest of the articles if this closes as delete, as they are basically the same info (notability wise). -- Asartea ^{Talk | Contribs} 12:41, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Strongly Keep – Meets WP:LISTPURP as a functional information source and navigational aid just like the Big Four international beauty pageants. As previously stated in previous deletion thread of the other articles of this kind that survived the AfD ((kept and not deleted) by wiki admin, North America for example the Philippines at major beauty pageants would force readers to click through many various articles to find the information that is summarized in this article.---Richie Campbell (talk) 05:50, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LISTPURP is not a notability criteria. It is part of MOS:LIST, which also applies to both embedded lists and standalone lists—provided that they are notable. JBchrch talk 08:23, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete no indication of notability per GNG. Also Wikipedia is not a repository for indiscriminate information. WP:LISTPURP is not a criteria for notability. And, this WP article is most likely a fan page. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 14:59, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment the related ANI discussion is here. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 04:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There is no indication at all that this is a notable topic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 18:35, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.