Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bahar Kol
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Fenix down (talk) 20:45, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Bahar Kol (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Playing 30 mins in a Champions League qualifier against Minsk is probably about as close as she ever got to meeting WP:NFOOTBALL. I also believe that Kol fails WP:GNG. I found nothing better than what was already provided in the article in a WP:BEFORE search. Source analysis to follow below. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:50, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Source analysis - no evidence of any WP:SIGCOV; see below Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:57, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
| Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
 This is just a profile page on the national FA website that every player has
|
✘ No | |
|
|
|
mentioned once
|
✘ No | |
|
|
|
mentioned once
|
✘ No | |
|
|
|
no coverage to speak of
|
✘ No | |
|
|
|
a name check
|
✘ No | |
|
|
|
another name check
|
✘ No | |
|
|
|
yet another name check
|
✘ No | |
|
|
|
mentioned only once
|
✘ No | |
|
|
|
again, mentioned just once with no analysis
|
✘ No | |
|
|
|
yet another passing mention, no depth
|
✘ No | |
| This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. | ||||
- Delete - fails GNG and NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 20:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete nothing even close to passing GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete. Doesn't meet general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 23:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - As per above MaskedSinger (talk) 11:09, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.