Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bacely YoroBi
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:03, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Bacely YoroBi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Social media spam. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. OSborn arfcontribs. 22:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. OSborn arfcontribs. 22:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy DeleteDelete. Autobio. Non-notable. -- Alexf(talk) 00:42, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Delete Speedy isn't an option as notability is asserted - however, he fails GNG Dusti*Let's talk!* 05:00, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 15:43, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, just blocked creator. Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Creator has attempted to fulfill WP:BLP requirements by belatedly adding references, but they are all from media sites and not therefore admissible. article is a non-notable autobiography, albeit with notability asserted. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 13:43, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Lacks any coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:16, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- UnDelete - I add reliable sources to establish notability.I think is a good article to Ivorian stub remymcfour (talk)12:12, 22 August 2013 (GMT)
- Delete Google has hits for every social networking site out there, but that's pretty much it. Google news, google news archives, etc all have nothing at all. Nowhere close to passing GNG. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 12:18, 22 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.