The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 10:54, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ayesha Abdullah (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The subject does not meet the criteria for presumption of notability contained in WP:NPOL, and does not appear to meet the general notability guideline (WP:SIGCOV) because of a lack of significant coverage in reliable sources. Bsherr (talk) 07:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Bsherr (talk) 07:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Bsherr (talk) 07:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Bsherr (talk) 07:39, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Agree with User:Bsherr, this article does not meet WP:NPOL or WP:GNG The Mirror Cracked (talk) 07:40, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• The article has enough refrences links to newspapers and talk shows provided to be approved — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.119.209 (talk • contribs) 07:43, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  Do the sources actually cover the subject, or do they just make passing mention of her in the context of covering other subjects? Can you provide examples? --Bsherr (talk) 07:51, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  The comment above by @Bsherr: is the most imperative I have seen today people forget in-depth coverage of subject and not mere passing comments are what reallly matters & constitutes WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 21:03, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  This article has valid refrences that refer to different newpapers and tv talk shows that strongly back this article. Thus recommended to not be deleted. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.160.119.209 (talk • contribs) 08:36, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. nothing found Urdu name on google, Fails WP:GNG. not enough established notable politician, She is a Just Politician member doesn't meet WP:NPOL.-Nahal^(T) 08:35, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete low level party official. Best, GPL93 (talk) 13:21, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NPOL & fails WP:GNG on all levels and almost can be categorized as a hoax I don’t think I saw any google hit whilst conducting research on this name.Celestina007 (talk) 21:06, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Krishna's flute (talk) 17:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.