The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Asad Madni was a Member of Parliament as per the source mentioned in the article: https://rajyasabha.nic.in/rsnew/pre_member/1952_2003/m.pdf (non-admin closure) ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 02:53, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As'ad Madani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable Islamist scholar and politician from India. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 08:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 08:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 08:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 08:16, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep BEFORE? Member of the upper house of India... WP:POLITICIAN. AfD is not cleanup.--Goldsztajn (talk) 17:30, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes WP:NPOL through the article lacked a WP:RS at the time of nomination but have found his name in the Rajya Sabha Website and added it .Subject is a 3 term member of the Rajya Sabha upper house of the Indian Parliament.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 17:49, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Hard Keep. Notable politician related to Jamiat Ulema e Hind. Been Member of Indian parliament. Does not meet the conditions of deletion. Moreover I have added relevant references from Archives of PMO India and others. Now tell me how are you fair in nominating it for deletion. I have seen you earlier nominating pages of Deobandi Ulama for deletion, tagging them as non-notable, it displays nothing but you being biased towards this section. Do some research before nominating any page for deletion. Add more to Wikipedia. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 19:03, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Clearly passes WP:NPOL as a member of a national legislature. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:05, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@GPL93:. Thanks a lot.Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk)

• Keep - members of parliament, former or current are presumed notable. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 19:57, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep This above nominator, User:❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ has shown clear and convincing bias, on both India and Pakistan AfD discussion forums, against all religious groups within Sunni Islam other than his own religious sect headed by Kanthapuram A. P. Aboobacker Musliyar in South India, for over a month now that I have been noticing him targeting other people's religious leaders and religious parties. Evidence is right here for anyone to see. He's a man of minimum words, when nominating for deletion. He simply and cleverly calls longtime members of Indian parliament or Rajya Sabha and heads of religious parties, "Non-notable" and nominates them for deletion. So far, I have not retaliated by nominating his religious leader for deletion. Ngrewal1 (talk) 21:07, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I only nominated for deletion the ones that are eligible for deletion. If my nomination is wrong, you can place it with evidence. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 02:37, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The statements proving that he was a Member of Parliament were added after my nomination. ❁ᴀᴜᴛʜᴏʀ❁ (❁ᴅᴏᴍ❁) 02:44, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per WP:NPOL. He has held national office. Iamreallygoodatcheckers (talk) 01:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.