The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 17:45, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Art6 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:NONPROFIT, WP:NORG. Currently sources do not pass WP:ORGDEPTH as many are local papers, local library and unacceptable primary sources. The purpose of this article appear to be promotional as it was created by user Mitzi.humphrey who also happens to be one of the six founders named here. Graywalls (talk) 08:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 08:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 08:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Virginia-related deletion discussions. Graywalls (talk) 08:07, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as non-notable per Graywalls. The OP, now banned, produced a number of articles that look legit and thorough at first glance, but don't stand up to analysis re: COI, self-promotion, notability, and good 3rd-party sourcing. It's artful cruft. But it's cruft. --Lockley (talk) 20:27, 17 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The sources in the article appear to be exclusively local small papers. The majority of the sources are actually about the artists they were involved with, and not about the gallery. (N.b.:I have to say I am shocked at how long MH managed to churn out self-promotion and COI articles on Wikipedia. I found a draft in her user space for an article on her daughter!)ThatMontrealIP (talk) 05:55, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Gallery notability is not determined through inheriting the notability of the artists it shows. One of a hundred-thousand other alternative spaces in the U.S., there is nothing that makes this one particularly notable. Sourcing is primarily blog-like Style Weekly, and covers the artist's shows, not the gallery itself. Does not pass WP:NONPROFIT, WP:NORG. Netherzone (talk) 20:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.