The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Canceled Apollo missions. ✗plicit 12:25, 27 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Apollo 21 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

tHis should redirect to the cancelled Apollo missions page. THere's nothing substantive at all about an Apollo 21 missons, and the two sources cited don't even mention it. Ingvario (talk) 11:04, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2021 September 20. —^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to cancelled Apollo missions. Apollo 21 appears to have been little more than a hypothetical mission, without having gone to any real planning stage. It's briefly mentioned in this NASA oral history, and is twice briefly mentioned in the book Apollo: The Lost and Forgotten Missions in a discussion of Apollo 20; and a fictional Apollo 21 flight is featured in several novels (e.g., Apollo 21: Riding the Hound; Lunar Discovery: Let the Space Race Begin). There's not enough about what seems to have been a mere wish of the NASA mission planners to justify an article. TJRC (talk) 18:31, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per above. A different reading of the prior AfD could easily have reached this conclusion the first time. PianoDan (talk) 22:24, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per nom. No need to have an independent article. -Pax Verbum 05:16, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to cancelled Apollo missions.4meter4 (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.