The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:47, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Apna Jobs (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company; WP:PROMO article refunded after soft deletion. Still fails WP:NCORP; sources in article and BEFORE search are a mix of WP:ORGTRIV on capital raises and financial results; and unreliable, promotional and unbylined WP:NEWSORGINDIA sources. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Karnataka. Dclemens1971 (talk) 18:54, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:01, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 19:37, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, and this article strengthens my conviction that we will need an RfC about Business Standard sometime soon. A lot of slop from there. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI (^{talk to me!}/_{my edits}) 08:17, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, as mentioned this article fails various standards including NCORP. C679 10:24, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.