The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 00:00, 29 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Annet van Egmond (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be undeclared WP:COI editing with no evidence of notability, poorly-sourced. Draft:William Brand, by the same contributor, has also been declined twice. Greenman (talk) 21:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Artists and Netherlands. Greenman (talk) 21:08, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:20, 21 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Perhaps "Brand Van Egmond" brand is notable:

https://www.architecturaldigest.com/story/netherlands-lighting-atelier-brand-van-egmond-opens-first-us-showroom perhaps also PR. But worth looking into in case anyone has more enthusiasm than me. CT55555(talk) 00:16, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

/agree with above. Worth looking if anyone is interested.  // Timothy :: talk  16:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That may be paid placement native advertising - it's not in Architectural Digest Magazine (AD), it's in AD-PRO, which, I am not mistaken, is a subsidiary of AD for "AD PRO members" who want to grow their business. See more here:[1], [2]. Netherzone (talk) 22:57, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: BLP. Sources are primary, promo, failed V. Does not meet GNG or any BIO, no IS RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. BLPs need clearly Ind RS with SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth for both content and notabilty to avoid abuse.  // Timothy :: talk  16:24, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - This article as well as the Draft:William Brand on her partner seem like promotional pieces created by a conflict of interest editor, as all of their edits promote these two partners and their business. Having said that, the sourcing in weak, and may be paid-placement/PR. Fails WP:GNG. Perhaps in a few more years the firm itself will be notable, as it is WP:TOOSOON for Van Egmond, Brand, and "Brand VanEgmond". Netherzone (talk) 23:07, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:PROMO WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:55, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.