The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:09, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An Tae-song (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article fails WP:GNG. Simione001 (talk) 23:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Simione001 (talk) 23:35, 26 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak keep Yonhap News reported that An Tae-song was reported as the fifth best soccer players in North Korea by the KCNA. [1] (Also reported here: [2]; Original report here: [3]) - He was called the second best soccer player in North Korea 2018: [4]. While I don't doubt that it will be difficult to find sources, someone being described as the second best soccer player in the country by the North Korean government suggests that there are likely more sources out there (potentially within North Korea). :3 F4U (they/it) 18:03, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:33, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:09, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per sources above which show notability (AGFing analysis). GiantSnowman 09:46, 29 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep passes GNG per above sources.--Ortizesp (talk) 02:53, 2 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.