Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Among Us
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed ejection of the user below. Please do modify it. Subsequent comments should not be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). Lots of further edits should be made to this page.
The result was to eject Old Naval Rooftops per WP:SELFREPORT, WP:NOVENTSINMAINSPACE, WP:AMONGUSSOCK and WP:SUSSS. As well, Category:Wikipedians who self-reported shall be added to O.N.R.'s userpage so they can forever remember their mistake. D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 01:12, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Among Us (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This page looks sus. I saw it vent.[April Fools!] O.N.R. (talk) 00:08, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Eject - This article is a sus impostor. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:11, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- O.N.R. sus There are no vents in mainspace. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 00:13, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Eject Old Naval Rooftops instead - they’re lying, I saw this page scan. As well, Sprit of Eagle said there aren’t any vents in mainspace. Sus... D🐶ggy54321 (let's chat!) 00:16, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Eject O.N.R. per WP:SELFREPORT —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- The Illuminati triangle is better. InvalidOStalk 00:35, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Eject O.N.R. Clearly just the imposter's sockpuppet account. —moonythesock (Sock P.) 00:38, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Eject Oshwah He is clearly sus. --BlueCrabRedCrab 00:43, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Self Report O.N.R. sus. Mainspace's vents closed for the airship update, right? ThatIPEditor Talk · Contribs 00:50, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- Eject O.N.R. Sus. Casspedia (talk) 00:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Old Naval Rooftops was An Impostor. 1 Impostor remains.
—pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 02:33, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposed ejection. Please do modify it. Subsequent comments should not be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). Lots of further edits should be made to this page.