Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay Marshal
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA1000 12:14, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
- Ajay Marshal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Notability far from established. This reads like a highly inflated autobiographical CV with no hint of notability in any of the claimed areas. Peter Rehse (talk) 11:50, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Perhaps I should have left this longer before AfD since there is a whole lot of chaotic editing going on with rapid removals and additions. Advise looking at page history.Peter Rehse (talk) 16:04, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete The Bangalore Mirror article from August 2011 is the only reference in this article that really stands up to scrutiny. The criteria for notability set out in WP:FILMMAKER do not appear to have not been met.
- Delete I mean the guy seems interesting, but his only notable work seems to be a really cheap film. As I said on its talk page, that's the only reason I didn't put it up for speedy delete. Jerodlycett (talk) 17:35, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:39, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete-Seems to be a article full of citation needed notes! Wgolf (talk) 23:54, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete While Marshal may well at some point contribute enough work to rise to the level of notability, he has not done so yet.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:18, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable.--DThomsen8 (talk) 16:44, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.