The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 22:10, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Afzal Ahmed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in coverage, clearly fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 21:36, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:44, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete it is time for us to stop hanging on to undersourced articles for 12 years.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:26, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per 100+ AFDs that provide consensus that 1 sports match is not enough if there wasn't significant coverage. Wikiprojects do not have a carte blanche to operate with just any type of lenient inclusion guideline. Geschichte (talk) 20:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Not enough significant coverage. Fails WP:NCRICKET. RationalPuff (talk) 18:15, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:SIGCOV Jenyire2 11:51, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.