The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 07:15, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Adriatica McKinney, Texas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This housing development appears to fail the general notability guideline. Both the sources provided fail the independence test (the Croatian source quotes heavily from press releases), and a good faith search online turned up nothing better (just some coverage in PR, blog, and real estate publications). VQuakr (talk) 01:08, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails GNG at this point. The article on Supetar already mentions the development and that is sufficient. —Мандичка^YO 😜 01:26, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - I created the article but agree with Мандичка that the info in Supetar is sufficient. It may merit a mention in McKinney, Texas too. – Miranche ^T C 04:57, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete and maybe mention at McKinney, Texas as mentioned - I'm from this area and it's not notable yet despite that News found some results. SwisterTwister talk 06:12, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:52, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:52, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.