The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:32, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adolf Miesz (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article created by a block-evading sock, however, has had good faith edits by editors in good standing so not eligible for a speedy deletion. That being said, referees are not covered by WP:NFOOTBALL and there is nothing here to support a case for meeting WP:GNG, as only database entries are cited. A search of Austrian sources only yields more databases like World Referee and Austria Soccer, which do not indicate notability. Nothing better found when altering the preference to German sources. Has an article in Hungarian Wikipedia too but that is also only sourced to indiscriminate databases. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Austria-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:03, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:07, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 21:02, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, per nominators WP:BEFORE and my own failed search. BilledMammal (talk) 01:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clearly fails GNG.John Pack Lambert (talk) 12:46, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. When I first found this page some things made no sense whatsoever. I know that's not a reason for deletion, however if there aren't any sources that establish its notability then I say it should be deleted. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) (Stupidity by me) 19:15, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.