The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. – bradv🍁 17:37, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Addicks Estates, Delaware (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Small subdivision fails GNG. No sign that this was ever a distinct or notable community, even before half of it was obliterated by freeway construction. –dlthewave ☎ 18:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 18:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delaware-related deletion discussions. –dlthewave ☎ 18:17, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete/Redirect to county, along with the rest of the hundreds of articles on subdivisions that show no notability like Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fleetwood Village, New Jersey. Reywas92^Talk 21:36, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - per WP:GEOLAND, Populated, legally recognized places are typically presumed to be notable, even if their population is very low. Maher-shalal-hashbaz (talk) 13:35, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• This one's difficult. It's a neighborhood of Claymont, Delaware. This [1] calls it a community separate from Claymont, in 1955, but in [2] 1943 was still referred to as being within Claymont. It's been significantly covered a couple times, and people are referred to as being from there. [3] Probably should be redirected and merged into Claymont. It is almost certainly NOT a populated, legally recognised place, per our definition of WP:GEOLAND. SportingFlyer T·C 02:58, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  The first link says "adjoining Claymont center north of Darley Road" so I'm reading that as being next to the center of the the community (now CDP), not separate from it. It's this now but "center" must have looked different before the highway. That would be the best target for the neighborhood. Reywas92^Talk 20:10, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  That's a plausible interpretation. Not splitting hairs, though. If there's anything which can be merged into Claymont, we should merge that into Claymont - definitely not suggesting an outright keep. Just getting exhausted with all of these AfDs. SportingFlyer T·C 03:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  We all are....well past time for bulk deletion or redirection... Reywas92^Talk 19:52, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.