The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KaisaL (talk) 05:40, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Abhay Nevagi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable person to have an article at mainspace. Taking a controversial murder case won't make him notable. There are no significant coverage or important works to mention. The references are WP:ROUTINE. Fails WP:PERSON and WP:GNG. - The9Man | (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Also to mention this article is created by WP:SOCK. - The9Man | (talk) 11:09, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. The9Man | (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. The9Man | (talk) 10:56, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a non-notable lawyer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 21:01, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete No signs of meeting WP:GNG. Shivkarandholiya12 (talk) 16:48, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.