The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:38, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ACMEAffiliates (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable. Andewz111 (no 'r') (nudge me) 22:36, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete Meets criteria for speedy deletion, in my opinion. Cptmurdok (talk) 22:40, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Delete I agree, it should be speedily deleted. Str8cash (talk) 22:50, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete a company founded in 2010 with no evidence for notability -- Whpq (talk) 16:16, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.