Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Sighetu Marmației explosions
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Mark Arsten (talk) 04:58, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 2012 Sighetu Marmației explosions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This wasn't notable the first time it was nominated; it isn't notable now. Beyond the short burst of initial coverage, there's no evidence of more lasting notability. - Biruitorul Talk 21:48, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:43, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep. The subject and it's aftermath seems to be covered by the press beyond the initial burst (on February 19): in March (Adevărul, Hotnews), April (România Liberă, Hotnews) and July (Cotidianul, Agerpres, Realitatea). Razvan Socol (talk) 18:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep appears to pass WP:PERSISTENCE and WP:DIVERSE per sources provided above as well as WP:GEOSCOPE ([1], [2], [3]). Cavarrone (talk) 08:06, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Electric Catfish 00:35, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I don't like it when well-written articles are deleted, but this event seems very minor. This sounds like something you'd read about in your local newspaper, not something which will ever make international news. Even if it did, it would be a minor story and definitely not something which many people will remember. Michael5046 (talk) 09:49, 1 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sources indicate notability. Everyking (talk) 20:32, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.