The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to List of top-level domains. (non-admin closure) czar ♔ 04:07, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

.menu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An irrelevant domain. A merge with a list of all top level domains could be good. Staglit (talk) 00:14, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Harsh (talk) 16:29, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• I think a redirect to something like Generic_top-level_domain#New_top-level_domains or List of top-level domains would be appropriate until the article sumbitter can demonstrate it has passed the WP:GNG. Collectively the new TLDs considered together, are highly noteworthy, which is why we have two articles discussing them, linked above, Individually, they are almost all not (yet) notable. There are a huge number of these, and they are actually quite easy to register, if you've got enough money. Just because something is in ICANN's database, doesn't mean it passes WP:N. -- The Anome (talk) 19:19, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Agree with Anome for a redirect; in this case, I think a redirect to List of top-level domains would be the most appropriate. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 04:48, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.