Archives

1, 2, 3, 4

Great job 38.143.188.36 (talk) 01:43, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:TheNewFrontier.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 7 November 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Babadook, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the titular monster from 2014 horror film The Babadook was later adopted as a gay icon in internet memes after being listed as an "LGBT film" by Netflix? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Babadook. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Babadook), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 12:02, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Blue Shell of Death and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 8#Blue Shell of Death until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 13:51, 8 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Steve Watch Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Ataru Moroboshi.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WohLogo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Rogers (film editor), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:06, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect You just got Luigi'd has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 April 10 § You just got Luigi'd until a consensus is reached. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:58, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for getting back to you a bit late. I had not checked the earliest provenance of the quote (maybe that's something that should be asked to the wider wiki community), but almost every source I checked - that was at least RS - attributed the quote to Marley. The best source I found just now, with the accompanying text as follows:

"Don’t be deceived by the war rhetoric — Marley was a peacemaker. He nearly gave his life for it in 1976. Political tensions between Jamaican PM Michael Manley and opposition leader, Edward Seaga, were thick. A peace-building concert was organised and Marley was scheduled to play. Two days to the concert, gunmen attacked his home, seriously injuring his wife and manager. Marley got away with minor injuries and defiantly went ahead to play at the concert without the terrified Wailers. “The people who are trying to make this world worse aren’t taking a day off. How can I?” he said thereafter, before going on self-exile in the UK till 1978."

- Jack Sebastian (talk) 17:40, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jack Sebastian: The article was posted in 2021; the quote was posted back in January 2009 by a retired Wikipedia user. If you can find one source that predates January 2009, then I can keep the quote. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 19:12, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain your reasoning for needing an earlier source for the quote? My understanding that the litmus for inclusion of verification, not truth. I think it fulfills both, as the quote, in every appearance, is attributed to Marley. Even the National Geographic considers it to be a quote by him 1. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 14:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

UTC)

Just because it was posted by a reliable source doesn’t mean it’s the correct information. Least we forget about the Brazilian Aardvark debacle from 2008-2014? The New Yorker covered it. It’s a great example of circular reporting. THAT’S why I need an article before January 2009. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 15:17, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, I would suggest that you both re-read my previous post and understand that - in comparison to other situations - OSE. I get what you are saying about circular reporting, but that isn't up to us. Your opinion on truth of the quote doesn't matter, and that is not meant to hurt your feelings, but instead to remind your that, in Wikipedia, THE LITMUS FOR INCLUSION IS VERIFIABILITY, NOT TRUTH.

If you are as deeply concerned about the verifiability of the quote, do more research yourself. I have provided several RS sources; you are completely free to research further, as in actually reading one or more of the books written about him. The quote is widely enough known that it might have turned up in some form there. I think it bears mentioning that in the article, one of the references are Issue 230 of Rolling Stone magazine, published 13 January, 1977. That seems pretty solid to me - and well before the Millennium, but the Help Desk might be able to check the magazine itself for the quote if you are concerned with the veracity of the quote.

If you want, you can suggest an RfC, A 3O, or jump on up to an admin board for their opinion on the matter. I have no dog in this fight, but removing fairly well-documented and reliably-sourced information does present a problem for me. Seeing as we are apparently in disagreement, widening the circle on the issue

@Jack Sebastian: I will let the admins know about it. Also, I read through the cited Rolling Stone Article that you mentioned. The purported quote is nowhere to be found. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 05:05, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I had requested access to the issue and article from my local library, but I hadn't heard back just yet. Could you be so kind as to link me to your source for the magazine and article?

I've also emailed you about the admin stuff as well as reached out to some higher ups at Wiki-En about it, so I'm not going to talk about it here. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 14:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Jack Sebastian: Thanks for reaching out to me and the admins. As for the Rolling Stones source, I used a website that copied and pasted the original article. I couldn’t find the quotation here.

In my discussion on the Bob Marley page, one user found a pre-2009 source. The Will Smith movie I Am Legend - found in this clip. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 15:04, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link. You're right; it doesn't seem to be there. And thanks for the link to I Am Legend clip.

I would ask that you strike the inference in the article discussion page that suggests that the quote was fabricated by a Wikipedia user or added disingenuously; it muddies the waters of the discussion, seems snarky, and isn't germane to the discussion, as well as for other reasons which I outlined in the email to you. I will confine my comments about Marley to the article discussion there. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 15:17, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I removed all mentions of any Wikipedia users in my side of the Bob Marley talk page. And thanks for understanding my point of view on the subject. I completely apologize for coming off as antagonistic. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 15:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your actions on the matter and hope we can continue to edit collaboratively. I think Oversight will handle the rest. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 16:12, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PrincessPeachShowtime.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect UGA vs TCU has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 4 § UGA vs TCU until a consensus is reached. funplussmart (talk) 12:49, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cole Bennett, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Drake.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I be working on the box office section on Concert film and wondering if you could help Finnish it off P+T

Fan Of Lion King 🦁 (talk) 17:32, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you read WP:REDYES. Schwede66 06:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I know this sounds very dumb but thanks for creating the Lynja Article I have been thinking of creating one for a while but haven’t known when or how to start Thanks have a good day!

Sincerely, SupersaurYT SupersaurYT (talk) 01:28, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@SupersaurYT: You are very welcome. I think it was the right time to create an article, considering that much of her earlier life was not reported before she died. After knowing about her life, I was able to find some articles from Newspapers.com to fill the gaps. I have followed her since around 2021 when I stumbled on her channel on YouTube shorts. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 01:30, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 January 2024, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Lynja, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 15:53, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Note: This notification was triggered due to your recent edits to Sweet Baby Inc.

⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 06:58, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on File:PhilSaviano.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a non-free file from a commercial source (e.g. Associated Press, Getty Images), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary. If you can explain why the file can be used under the non-free content guidelines, please add the appropriate non-free use tag and rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 20:04, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MikeHillEditor.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ⟲ Three Sixty! ^Talk? _Work. 15:58, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ConradNervig.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ⟲ Three Sixty! ^Talk? _Work. 19:35, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bryan Hearne, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

ANU^writes 08:21, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of American Cinema Editors at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 02:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 16:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Nineteen Ninety-Four guy: Thank you so much! I'm excited to hear your thoughts on the article. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 16:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Nineteen Ninety-Four guy -- Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 16:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there at your earliest convenience. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SnowFire (talk) 04:39, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Cupcakes are tasty and sweet like citations I give as a gift this to you Yoshiman6464. LlV2 (talk) 21:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for properly fixing the bolding of my keep on the AFD. I had forgotten how to get the apostrophe on an iPhone. Now I’ve got it. Keep up the good work! Edison (talk) 00:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The redirect Plumbus has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 21 § Plumbus until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 30 April 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the 2004 documentary The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing contains interviews from dozens of film editors, including women under-represented in the field? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Cutting Edge: The Magic of Movie Editing), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Great work on a fascinating subject! Viriditas (talk) 19:40, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Viriditas: Thank you so much. I found a lot of interesting insight regarding the documentary with the power of 5x expansion. Although the page failed to get the Good Article nomination - especially with the messy reception section - several users helped clean up the article. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 20:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Did you get a chance to hear this interview in March? The transcript is not as good as listening to it, but that link has both. Viriditas (talk) 19:37, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yoshiman6464, just following up on Talk:Dazed and Confused (film)/GA1 which you opened a month ago. Are you still planning to proceed with this review? CMD (talk) 15:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Chipmunkdavis: Of course. My apologies; I got a bit busy this past month. I’ll release my review this weekend. The article looks good so far. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 15:45, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, thanks for taking on the review. CMD (talk) 16:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Right Side Broadcasting.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HelloFresh.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:26, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ulterior Motives (The Lost Album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ulterior Motives (The Lost Album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Skyshiftertalk 00:39, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Video games based on Rick and Morty has been nominated for splitting. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 21:39, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:GottaCatchEmAll.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:20, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Basket of deplorables you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 19:21, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Basket of deplorables you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Basket of deplorables and Talk:Basket of deplorables/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 16:26, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article R/The Donald you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 06:16, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Basket of deplorables you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Basket of deplorables for comments about the article, and Talk:Basket of deplorables/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Riley1012 -- Riley1012 (talk) 23:44, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Riley1012: Thank you so much! Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 00:23, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article R/The Donald you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:R/The Donald and Talk:R/The Donald/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 21:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@IntentionallyDense: I will check the comments at the end of the weekend. I am currently on vacation with my family. Most likely on Monday, I'll address the comments and work on the article. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 21:53, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article R/The Donald you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:R/The Donald for comments about the article, and Talk:R/The Donald/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of IntentionallyDense -- IntentionallyDense (talk) 08:44, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Electronic Musician.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Vulcan❯❯❯Sphere! 01:53, 29 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Forgot to put an edit note - I don't particularly care whether he's in the list, I don't know the policy well enough, but he should not be referred to as an "assassin" nor should his name be linked as he doesn't hjave his own article. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 17:53, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Darth Stabro: In my edit note, I highlighted this, per WP:PEOPLELIST - "If the person is famous for a specific event, the notability requirement need not be met. If a person in a list does not have a Wikipedia article about them, a citation (or link to another article) must be provided to: a) establish their membership in the list's group; and b) establish their notability on either BLP1E or BIO1E". When I submitted Luigi's name - I linked the article he was heavily featured in. Since you mainly have an issue with him being described as an "assassin", I think it's better to add him back as a "suspect". Luigi in question was also charged with second-degree murder in a Brooklyn court. I'll add Luigi back unless you want to discuss it further. Yoshiman6464 ^♫🥚 19:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and re-add him - my main thing is about properly linking and phrasing. ~Darth Stabro^{Talk • Contribs} 19:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you are receiving this message, it means that you were a participant of the Donald Trump WikiProject at one point. The Trump WikiProject was deleted earlier this year, but it has been re-established as a task force under WikiProject United States Presidents. If you would like to participate in the Trump task force, please leave a comment to this message. elijahpepe@wikipedia (he/him) 03:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WickedForGood.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Trailblazer101 (talk) 22:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Reagan (2024 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Variety.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]