Feel free to . --Yodin

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Volksmärchen der Deutschen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Charles Bennett. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yodin! Yes, I'm from Zaragoza although living now in Germany (I didn't update the Photographers table for years :-S). Anyway, I usually travel to Zaragoza three or four times a year, next time will be probably at the end of May/beginning of June. If waiting is not a problem for you, I can for sure go then to the museum and take some photos of the tapestry, it shouldn't be any problem :-) Regards! --Willtron (?) 07:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Willtron: Yep, that would be great thanks! And yeah, no rush! ‑‑Yodin^T 21:55, 2 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yodin! As promised I was yesterday in the museum taking some photos of the tapestry. I tried to take some general views and also some details of the three main characters. You can find them all here. Enjoy them and best regards! :-) --Willtron (?) 08:53, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much Willtron, hugely appreciate it! Will add them to the articles now 👍👍👍 ‑‑Yodin^T 12:34, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1812 short story collections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:1823 short story collections indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yodin. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cadoc of Cornwall, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 25 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yodin. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cadoc of Cornwall".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:05, 25 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. I'd never heard of this book before, and I'm intrigued. You need not have read it, of course, but if you have should I be reading it as well? Does it bear comparison with Carlyle's German Romance for example? --Antiquary (talk) 09:02, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The translations are very hit and miss, definitely not as good as Carlyle, but there are some interesting stories in there. I haven't read all of them yet (I'm slowly working my way through adding them on Wikisource), but though some of these translations seem to have been quite influential (e.g. for Stevenson's "Bottle Imp", Poe's "Ligeia", and for including the first Nibelungenlied story to be translated into English), I think the works they inspired tend to be much better. I was drawn to the book as it had a complete translation of one of the Fantasmagoriana stories (the same one as Carlyle's German Romance; I find it interesting that he chose to translate three others from Popular Tales too), but finally decided to start the article when I came across some quite obscure sources that give some of the possible translators (De Quincey seemed to be the only one identified in recent academic mentions of the book). The article's very much still in progress though – I think there's a bound to be a better way to write the Translators section, there are more contemporary reviews, which all need to be summarised more concisely than the ones there now, and there is some academic coverage of De Quincey's involvement with the book too (he worked closely with the publisher Bohte, who probably deserves his own article too). Would also be great to find a reliable source that identifies the original version of "The Magic Dollar" (the only theory I can find is ISFDB claiming the author is la Motte Fouqué, probably assuming it's just a variant of "The Bottle-Imp"). Looking through the articles you've written, any advice on improving the article that occurs to you would be much appreciated! ‑‑Yodin^T 17:10, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I suppose it always was going to be unlikely that they were up to the Carlyle standard, but my curiosity remains. I'll try them. I wouldn't, by the way, read too much into Carlyle's having chosen four stories from Fantasmagoriana: his letters make it clear that he was having a hard job finding much German fiction up there in 1820s Scotland, so he wouldn't have had much scope for rejecting stories. I find it difficult to give anyone advice on the composition of their WP articles since my own method is just to write up every data point I can find and then heap them together in such order as might give the illusion there was some sort of reasoned thought at work. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't. I tend to concentrate on the literary-biographical and bibliographical aspects of my subject and often fight shy of summarising modern criticism, since I'm not sure that opinion, even expert opinion, really has a place here. But I may be wrong. "The Magic Dollar" is ascribed to La Motte Fouqué by the Ashley and Contento Supernatural Index, which is perhaps ISFDb's source, but is either of them reliable enough to use? I suppose you've tried feeding sample phrases from each of the stories into Google Books to see if they turn up in some collection by De Quincey or whoever else? In some ways GB allows you to be a better bibliographer than the greatest experts in the 20th century were. --Antiquary (talk) 18:28, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! And I couldn't agree more about Google Books etc. making so much possible that would have taken a lifetime or more to find otherwise – will try as you suggest. ‑‑Yodin^T 19:27, 27 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yodin. Thank you for your work on Pandrasus. User:Onel5969, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Very nice job on the article, keep up the good work.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Onel5969}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:37, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: thank you very much! 😁 ‑‑Yodin^T 19:29, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hafren, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Camber.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Popular Tales and Romances of the Northern Nations, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:57, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ten years ago, you were found precious. That's what you are, always. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:38, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yodin - great to see your work on this lady - my 3rd g-grandmother. My wife and i visited All Saints Church Aldwinckle last year and were surprised to find that her remains are under the altar in that place. I'll try to edit the entry (my first time at doing so!) to update IBW54 (talk) 23:43, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@IBW54: Thanks for the edit, and welcome to Wikipedia :) I've added the standard welcome template to your talk page (though it looks like you've already worked out how to edit, and add links, etc.), and have looked over the Mary Rolls article again. I started the article when I was researching The Literary Magnet, which had published some of her poems, and thought I would make an article for her at the same time, so it's currently just a brief outline of her life; please add to the article if you'd like! And let me know if I can help or you have any questions. --Yodin^T 07:17, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - my wife and I travelled from Brisbane to the UK last year to dig up some dead relatives so I have a little bit on her and her more famous brother Sir William - who founded the Royal National Lifeboat Institution. Over the years I've found a lot of her poems in the Magnet and its like - including one published on the front page of a Sydney newspaper in 1840 - "The Deluge". The British Library has published some of her works in the last decade or so. Once I can figure out how to navigate the maze of copyright stuff I'll try to attach the photo of her plaque which I expect was paid for by brother William as he gives himself billing too! John Dryden was also born in the All Saints Rectory. 27.99.27.14 (talk) 02:10, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you've contributed a lot to Rubezahl, would you be interested in a taskforce on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 16:45, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm interested in folklore, but don't really know enough to contribute, or time at the moment unfortunately! Glad to see you've got a lot of excellent editors so far, and hope to contribute in the future! --Yodin^T 19:02, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, no worries, your time is valuable. There’s a section with some sources for people interested but unfamiliar if that might be useful? Kowal2701 (talk) 19:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, regarding these edits: the reply tool definitely does work for a post where {{subst:undated}} was used to add a timestamp, see this edit which I made using the reply tool when logged out.. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 14:14, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks very much for checking this; I wasn't looking forward to trying to fix it if it was broken! --Yodin^T 15:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]