Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2004 ARCA/ReMax Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2004 ARCA/ReMax Series, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 10:54, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yeel88! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 10:54, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

We need to see significant coverage of the subject in secondary sources. Wikipedia cannot be used as a source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2004 ARCA/ReMax Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2004 ARCA/ReMax Series, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:22, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ReMax Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ReMax Series, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 14:14, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Snowycats was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See prior comments.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ReMax Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ReMax Series, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Snowycats (talk) 06:21, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Clement Racing, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please use reference footnotes to indicate how the references that you included relate to the content of the page and establish notability for the team. Ost (talk) 16:14, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Austin Hill Racing, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Please use reference footnotes to indicate how the references that you included relate to the content of the page and establish notability for the team. Ost (talk) 16:25, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I really want to know how to make external links. --Yeel88 (talk) 17:28, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

In direct response to your question, WP:EL contains information about external links. You likely also should look over Help:Footnotes.

Please note that other editors are unlikely to see and respond to requests for help on your page unless you use {{help}}. The messages from other editors in the sections above also give links to various other places that you can look and ask for help. You may want to refrain from creating articles until you learn how to look up policies and procedures. —Ost (talk) 17:42, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Austin Hill Racing

Clement Racing

2004 ARCA Re/Max Series

Kimmel Racing

An article you recently created, Kimmel Racing, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Same issues as other articles: Needs references the support the content and to demonstrate notability; notability is not inherited. Ost (talk) 17:41, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How many references are supposed to be on a page? --Yeel88 (talk) 17:43, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeel88, Howdy hello! Generally the minimum number of references needed to establish notability is three. Those sources need to be reliable, independent, and give significant coverage to the subject. You also might wish to take a look at our easy guide to referencing, which covers how to add references using our software. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 17:48, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Expanding on the excellent replies by User:CaptainEek, a concern with the sources on the racing team pages is that the sources don't explicitly mention the team (c.f., the Frank Kimmel page; if this were a reliable source, it could be used to demonstrate Frank Kimmel's wins, but there are no sources to indicate that he was on Kimmel Racing at the time).

Additionally, the references indicate authors for the webpages, but I don't see those authors listed on the page; I was uncertain where the citation text for those references came from. —Ost (talk) 18:27, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please help me with... what are some reliable sources? Is Racing-reference.info one? Yeel88 (talk) 17:49, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

From a first glance, it appears to be user created content, which would make it unreliable. You might wish to ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR to get a more informed answer however, as I am not familiar with racing. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 18:04, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Amkgp were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Clement Racing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Clement Racing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~Amkgp ✉ 17:53, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft does not appear to indicate that one of the sports notability criteria is satisfied. If one of the criteria is satisfied, please revise this draft appropriately, with a reliable source, if necessary stating on the talk page which criterion is met, and resubmit. It is the responsibility of the submitter to show that a sportsperson or other subject satisfies a notability criterion.

You may ask for advice about the sports notability criteria (or other notability criteria) at the Teahouse.

In particular, see and refer to WP:NMOTOR for notability. If this team satisfies one of the criteria in the notability guideline, please identify it on the draft talk page when resubmitting.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Austin Hill Racing and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Austin Hill Racing, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:44, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NASCARfan0548 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ReMax Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ReMax Series, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NASCARfan0548 ↗ 23:06, 18 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ThorSport Racing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ben Rhodes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What are some reliable NASCAR sources? Are there any common ones I missed? I need to know if I want to publish my four articles thank you!--Yeel88 (talk) 13:28, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You can find a list of reliable NASCAR sources at Wikipedia:WikiProject_NASCAR/Standards#List_of_reliable_sources. 78.28.44.111 (talk) 15:06, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are there any articles I should focus on? Or should I make a different one?--Yeel88 (talk) 13:30, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As a general rule, it's best for both Wikipedia and you if you focus on things you want to focus on (and if there are no such things, you should just take a break); that said, there is a to-do list at Wikipedia:WikiProject_NASCAR/To-do that may give you some ideas. 78.28.44.111 (talk) 15:12, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that the NASCAR To-Do talk page mentions "For a quicker response to discussion/queries, go to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject NASCAR. Seeing as the last post on the To-Do talk page was 10 years ago, it's unlikely that you will get a response to your question there. —Ost (talk) 05:35, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NASCARfan0548 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:ReMax Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:ReMax Series, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NASCARfan0548 ↗ 03:16, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is it okay to have more than one account so I can have an extra to edit more stuff? Because I have one, User:Yeel87.

Multiple accounts are permitted in certain circumstance however there is virtually no reason for you to have two just to source stuff. Please see Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#LEGIT. Praxidicae (talk) 14:20, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is this the account you want to use? Please let me know because plan on blocking the rest unless you can provide a legitimate reason to create and maintain a handful of accounts.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 03:41, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me? No, a user does not need to explain why they need additional accounts (although this one has already volunteered that information above and on their user page); the onus is on the blocking admin to provide a reason for the block. The accounts simply existing isn't good enough. Also, should I assume you performed a CU check on this user? If so, on what grounds? Was there disruptive editing? Because I don't see any other than, quite frankly, from you right now, as you seem to be threatening a new user who did nothing wrong (as far as I can see) with account blocks for no apparent reason. Iaritmioawp (talk) 07:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• My question is for Yeel88. Yeel88, could you please respond to my original question, with the link to Wikipedia:Sock_puppetry#LEGIT provided by Praxidicae above in mind? Thank you, -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  A direct and specific answer to your question is already on his user page: "I have two sister accounts User:Yeel87 for editing things not on NASCAR [a]nd User:Yeel89 as a backup for editing anything." Having one account for NASCAR (his main area of editing), one for non-NASCAR stuff, and one as a backup (for editing on public PCs, etc.) sounds very reasonable to me. Unless there exist additional undisclosed accounts that you are aware of, he answered your question before you even asked it. If there are additional undisclosed accounts, I apologize for the interference and agree that they should probably be disclosed, and admit that they may possibly need to be blocked, but otherwise, I must ask that you desist your attempts to coerce this user into choosing just one out of his three properly linked, disclosed and purposefully created accounts as you have no grounds for making such a demand of him. Iaritmioawp (talk) 19:53, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have no intent in engaging with you in your self-appointed role of advocate in this situation. For a number of reasons, including details contained in oversighted edits, I have concerns regarding this new editor's ability to edit competently with a single account, let along multiple accounts created for various purposes. This is why I asked them to explain how they intend to use the accounts in a manner meeting WP:SOCK#LEGIT. The only way I can alleviate these concerns is to have them respond to my questions as opposed to you popping in to respond on their behalf. If you believe tools have been abused, feel free to make a complaint wherever you think it will gain the most traction, but I won't be responding further to you here. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:13, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ponyo, I want to have more accounts o I can keep track of my edits just like how Taritmiotop (talk) said, "I have two sister accounts User:Yeel87 for editing things not on NASCAR [a]nd User:Yeel89 as a backup for editing anything." As of my understanding, I do not see how you have a reason to ask me this question.--Yeel88 (talk) 23:13, 23 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Yeel88, I'm Ponyo. You'll likely not be pleased about this but I have removed some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thank you, and sorry for messing about with your edits! Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 16:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on In Search Of Sacha, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 23:55, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Team Penske (NASCAR), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ryan Newman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:22, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The section of your user page titled "In Search Of Sacha And The Swordbringer" sufficiently resembles an advertisement to be a violation of our user pages policy. I recommend you remove it. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Kpgjhpjm were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not resubmit unless the article is properly sourced .

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2004 ARCA Re/Max Series and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2004 ARCA Re/Max Series, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kpgjhpjm 06:53, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, 2010 NASCAR K&N Pro Series East, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 21:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NASCARfan0548 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft needs more sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2010 NASCAR K&N Pro Series East and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2010 NASCAR K&N Pro Series East, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the , on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NASCARfan0548 ↗ 23:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yeel88. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kimmel Racing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 15:52, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yeel88. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Max Series".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:58, 7 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yeel88. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Austin Hill Racing".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 00:45, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yeel88. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2010 NASCAR K&N Pro Series East".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! NASCARfan0548 ↗ 17:07, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]