Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lightspeed Venture Partners, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Lightspeed Venture Partners, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL" error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 15:41, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:7368570-mars-cars-apple-ii-title-screen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message here. Will make the necessary changes now. Cheers ~ WorldPeace888 (talk) 09:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello WorldPeace888. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Primavera Capital Group‎, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:WorldPeace888. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=WorldPeace888|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Amigao (talk) 18:31, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Amigao I am not receiving any payment from any firms to edit Wiki.

The information edited is based on relevant sources. WorldPeace888 (talk) 15:35, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Addtionally, if there is any issue with my logic, please state it on the 'talk' page of the topic. I am open to learning. However, I am NOT getting any payments.

I just did an edit which is referenced from 'Financial Times' to make the page more balanced. Making a page balanced does NOT mean I am getting paid!!! WorldPeace888 (talk) 15:37, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at HSBC, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Please stop adding news reports to the article and to Royal Bank of Canada (and others). Read WP:5P1. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia of established, sourced facts, not a newspaper or a blog for financial updates. Zefr (talk) 14:45, 1 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]