Hello, Wise dude321, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style
• Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.

PS, sorry to hear you got vandalised so soon after starting editing. I've put you on my wp:watchlist in case the vandals return. ϢereSpielChequers 21:58, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Wise dude321. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Grsz^{11 →Review!} 19:25, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DUDE!!! THIS WAS MY TALK PAGE!!! Do you think I did that? Of course it was reverted!

I'm getting the feeling he mistargeted while leaving a vandalism warning! Don't worry about it. ~ mazca ^t|c 19:38, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ha, oops, sorry. Grsz^{11 →Review!} 19:41, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wisedude, thanks for the award, hope all is well and your enjoying your time on Wikpedia. ϢereSpielChequers 21:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

First, I wish to apoligize in advance. I don't think I should be putting this here, but I found the other link very un-user friendly, and had no idea how to navigate it. On World of Goo, you removed a link to a site which gave a "Game play dissection" or something along those lines. I can't think why you removed it, I went to the link and it seemed to be pretty competent. So, why did you?Wise dude321 (talk) 02:52, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Because it had been spammed across several wikis. If you think it meets the requirements in WP:EL, you might ask on the article's talk page whether it'd be a good link to add. I happen to disagree with you - I don't think it enhances the article.  — Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 03:53, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I think that's logical enough. It doesn't seem prominent or notable, and I'm just to tired to argue the point. You can un-watch me.Wise dude321 (talk) 05:18, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A reception table's unnecessary for the series. If they want to see the reception of a game, they can go to the game's article. There's no consensus to include series reception tables - it's completely redundant to those found in the game articles, and it uses up space. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 05:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This can be discussed in the prose, we don't need to know what it scored. - The New Age Retro Hippie used Ruler! Now, he can figure out the length of things easily. 05:36, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for engaging in an edit war at Spyro (series). Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.  Sandstein  17:31, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Responded on my talk page. Larrythefunkyferret (talk) 05:07, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Spyro the Dragon (character).JPG. You don't seem to have said where the image came from or who created it. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 01:05, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christ your a thick bot. Wise dude321 (talk) 01:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

"I hate to be using the talk page like this but one of my friends doesn't believe that we landed on the moon. His main point is "If Neil Armstrong was the first man on the moon, how did the cameras get there?" I assume that it was a pod that landed near it, but and exact truth would be appreciated."

Do you mean the TV camera showing Armstrong going down to the Moon the first time? The Apollo TV camera was attached to the side of the Lunar Module. When he was part of the way down he pulled on a cord to make it deploy. Bubba73 (talk), 03:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added this photo to the Apollo TV camera to show how it was mounted on the side of the Lunar Module. If you can't see the camera in this photo, first look at the top of Apollo TV Camera to see a close up of it. Bubba73 (talk), 03:32, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Wise dude 321,

Could I suggest that it might be helpful if you could consider toning down the sarcasm in some of your edit summaries? For instance, I agree with your deletion of some trivia in Cane (tool) but when you write in the edit summary "(Because that's totally useful and relevant information.)" -- meaning, presumably, the opposite of what you say, i.e. that the information is useless and irrelevant -- you give the impression of being exasperated and/or rude and not assuming good faith. On top of that, your purpose will not be understood in some cultures. Thanks, Alarics (talk) 07:47, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your kind reply at my page.Alarics (talk) 07:31, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wise dude: Just to let you know that mould is a perfectly acceptable (ie English) spelling of mold. They both mean either fungus or a form, the meaning of which is derived by content. Some Canadians like to differentiate between the meanings, keeping as you suggest mould for fungi and mold for form, but there is, officially, no difference. Cheers! --Kosmoshiva (talk) 14:34, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

was moved to User:Wise dude321/Philosophies (correct capitalization). Skier Dude (talk) 21:45, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:07, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Spyro the Dragon (character).JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:25, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Kongregate logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]