Welcome!

Hello, Vitriden, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Mushroom (Talk) 02:27, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to vote for Belgrade at the Article Improvement Drive page, here. --estavisti 21:12, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You recently updated Image:LeBron James USA.jpg, which, if truly self-taken, could be a great boon to the LeBron James article as a free photo. Wikipedia image use policy requires that you tag every image you upload to assert it's copyright status, which you did not do for this image. Not to worry, I have retagged it as {{GFDL-presumed}}, and if you have taken this image and you are willing to release it into the GFDL, you can re-tag it again to full-fleged {{GFDL-self}}. Otherwise, if it comes from a seperate source the image needs source information and a proper copyright. Thanks! Staxringold 14:56, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am relatively new here, I don't know about the way it goes. I will make the change (yes, I have taken the photo myself). Should I put the original photo, since this is just a part of one much larger picture? Yours truly Vitriden 15:06, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the quick response and fix! It's so nice to see new editors making useful contributions (non-copyrighted images of celebrities aren't easy to come by). For example this image is a cropped version of this image, and because they are both free I've uploaded both in case anyone wants to do touch-ups that require the original. I think the image is fine as is, but uploading the full version and linking to it on the cropped version never hurts. Staxringold 17:37, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, done.

Vitriden 23:10, 10 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Was I too late to have my input in the move proposal or is it still on? Balkanskiredneck (talk) 00:58, 18 May 2010 (UTC) Hvala[reply]

Hello! I invite you to join the WikiProject Serbia. All the best, --serbiana - talk 02:38, 13 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dzoni 16:26, 29 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Da li ti uopste citas ono sto napises? Eto ti objasnjenja.

Vitriden 07:00, 30 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Posted by (^'-')^ Covington 07:13, 1 May 2006 (UTC) on behalf of the the AID Maintenance Team[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs FK Budućnost Podgorica Plav Gregory Keyes Nemanja Vidić Mile Kitić Yugoslav People's Army Seka Aleksić FK Smederevo Robert Sean Leonard Gusinje Daniel C. Tsui Nikšić FK Zeta Radnički Niš Faroe Islands national football team Football Association of Yugoslavia FK Budućnost Banatski Dvor 112th United States Congress FK Voždovac

Cleanup Darko F. Ribnikar Funny Pants Shamsul Maidin Merge Third-World Feminism Chicken Little (2005 film) Lenny Leonard Add Sources ESPN The Magazine Teamgeist Kim Milton Nielsen Wikify European Broadcasting Union Immatain Golden pheasant fc Expand History of Montenegro Urano Teixeira da Matta Bacellar Laurence Janifer

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 03:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you change diacritics in the "Coaches" section of the Red Star article (removed "ć" from the surnames etc.)? There is not a single reason to that. Also, almost entire talk page is dedicated to the fact that some people think the name of the article should be "Red Star", while others support the name "Crvena Zvezda". And now you come and solve the problem immediately. That's simply the wrong way to do that. Also, your opinion is nobody's business here, so get back the info you've removed. If this is an encyclopedia, than it should be informative, whether you like the informations it gives, or not. Vitriden 12:46, 21 July 2006 (UTC)

It was a mistake, lost some diacritics when editing in notepad, fixed. Changed article it to follow conventions than every other international football club has, as well as the name that UEFA uses. Trying to be bold and improve the article that seems to need it. Why is my opinion worth less than yours? What information have I removed except the "cigani" nickname which is obviously not a commonly established nickname for the team.--Lowg 16:41, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have no reason to consider my opinion more valuable than yours. But there is one thing called consensus, which is one of the reasons Wikipedia actually exists. All the things you've changed have been talked about on the talk page, so please read it first, then say what you have and listen what others have to say on the issue, and then make the changes. This way, if only two persons have different opinions, there will be infinite reverting until the end of time. And we don't want that, do we?

BTW, you've done good job in the coaching history section, and I have the same opinion as you on most issues, but I know the others don't think the same way, so we have to compromise as much as we can. Vitriden 18:02, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so what do you suggest? Are you ok with the article is now? I'm not trying to force anything, I just felt by looking at article it was not the same level of quality and consistancy as other international football club articles. I would like to work together since it seems you might feel the same way --Lowg 20:03, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Now we're talking. I have tried to improve the article a little and we'll see if there are any complains (and there have always been some). Patience is everything. Oh, and I have moved entire Talk page from the Red Star article, since I think it belongs here. That's about that.

I think this should be OK Vitriden 11:10, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have not completely removed edit. Moved most relevent info to opening para. Clemente has only recently taken charge of Serbia and with the greatest respect bar being appointed, there is not much else to report. Most of what you wrote was speculation about future events or referred to recent events about Serbia in World Cup which had nothing at all to do with Clemente. Most recent does not necessarily mean most important. Clemente has a long history as a La Liga manager and only a short history to date with Serbia. Hopefully from your POV there will be more to write about in future. Djln--Djln 23:43, 26 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS Have posted these and your comments on Talk:Javier Clemente

Treba pomeniti da su navijaca Rada listom okoreli nacisti.

Ice Cold 20:23, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jesu. Pomeni.

Vitriden 00:51, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

See this section in the history of Atheletic Bilbao, it seems that from 1941 to ?1970? the team changed it's name to Atlético Bilbao... Not certain of this myself since the article is a little vague of the exact date, but I'm fine with your version though just to keep the article consistent. Just don't want to think I was still being sloppy, there was some thought put into this one ;) --Lowg 21:53, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't know that, not that I'm watching you or anything:). Keep on the good work. Vitriden 21:58, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vratio sam tvoje izmene kod Sente i Sonte jer se "dablink" stavlja kad su imena potpuno ista, a ne kad se razlikuju za jedno slovo. PANONIAN (talk) 14:31, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Članak "Ryan Adams" je radije izuzetak nego pravilo. Smatram da je stvarno loše da ako članak piše o jednoj temi, na njegovom početku "reklamiramo" druge članke koji sa njim nemaju nikakve veze osim sličnog imena, pogotovo što upravo to može uticati da neko ove pojmove pomeša. Pogledaj ovo: Svetozar Miletić. Postoji i selo koje se zove Svetozar Miletić, ali nisam u taj članak stavio link do članka o selu, nego link do "disambiguation" stranice, na kojoj se pominju i osoba i selo sa ovim imenom. U slučaju Sente i Sonte, "disambiguation" stranicu čak nije moguće napraviti, jer pojmovi nisu isti. Znači ponavljam: ako je članak o Senti, onda zaista nema potrebe da na njegovom početku "reklamiramo" članak o Sonti, jer oni nemaju baš nikakve veze, a ni imena im nisu ista. Sledeće, ako hoćeš da budeš dosledan onda bi valjda trebao da napišeš da Sentu ne treba pomešati ni sa ovim člancima: Sent, Santa, Sinti, itd, itd... Međutim, sve je to nepotrebno i suvišno ukoliko imena nisu ista. "Disambiguation" stranice postoje zbog istih reči sa različitim značenjem, ne zbog različitih reči koje nekom izgledaju slično. PANONIAN (talk) 22:56, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

E da, i što se tiče tvoje tvrdnje da je veza tih mesta što su oba u Vojvodini, po čemu je Vojvodina okvirni geografski pojam po kome se treba ravnati da bi se utvrdila veza između dva mesta? Možemo takođe reći da su mesta Senta i Sent u Evropi (umesto u Vojvodini) i eto veze između njih, zar ne? :)) PANONIAN (talk) 23:01, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dobro, ne zanima me, ja smatram da je korisno, ti ne smatras, nemam nameru da se ubedjujem oko toga. Radi kako ti volja.

Pozdrav,

Vitriden 23:05, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know you have been editing the Crvena Zvezda article for a while now, so I thought you might be interested in the outcome of this. To warn you it is a silly dispute going on now and I'm frustrated that have spent so much time on it already. If you have some free time, I am curious what your thoughts are in the issue. UEFA CL talk page --Lowg 20:33, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted a recent edit you made to the article Iggy Pop. You did not provide an edit summary, and I could not determine whether the edit was vandalism or a constructive contribution. In the future, please use edit summaries. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Rsm99833 15:53, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ni ja nisam siguran. Mislim da ima dvojno državljanstvo. Igra jako dugo u ČSK. Stavio sam da je Albanac zato što je to najlogičnije zbog njegovog imena i prezimena. Izvini što odgovaram posle nedelju dana. Krečim kuću pa nisam imao vremena za Wikipediju. Stefanmg 21:43, 12 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You mind leaving a response here? Cheers, --Palffy 14:56, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Seems Castillo was not signed but is on loan for 6 months. I too was sceptical at first since I didn't see it in the news, but just found an article that confirms it on JadranSport.// Lowg ^.talk. 01:09, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't care what will happen to the page, as long as there is a consensus (or something close to it). Okay, if you have the info that there are other domains considered for Montenegro, that's fine by me, but as far as I can see on CcTLD#ccTLDs not in ISO 3166-1, there is not a single example of the use of a domain other than the one listed as alpha-2 code for the country. It is a rule, as far as I can see. And since SP and ME are new codes for Serbia and Montenegro, respectively, the rule will be applied to them as well. I really can't see how can there be some discussion on the issue in Montenegro, when the rule is clear. Best of luck, --Vitriden 12:55, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello i see you are right gegic changed nationality in 1979 my mistake im sorry

Greetings. I went through this page and added diacritics, but since I don't know Serbian, much of what I did was really an educated guess. Would you mind checking and correcting my work? Thank you very much. Biruitorul 20:28, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you – much appreciated. Biruitorul 22:48, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's OK to cite a published source eve if it's not available on the web. You can use the {{cite news}} template.

By the way, I don't know what Partizan were thinking when buying that guy, he's never been a star player of any kind in Bulgaria and he was totally forgotten when he went to play in Azerbaijan :) Ješić must have had an absolutely distorted notion of his abilities... it's no surprise Nikolov is disappointing.

But that's just a personal opinion anyway :) Todor→Bozhinov 18:41, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see about the paper — providing a web link would've been great, but printed is still OK (if you can remember the issue and the title of the article :))

As I looks, Nikolov is really disappointing, but I have to say I wasn't expecting anything else when Partizan bought him. I was actually thinking "What the hell are these guys doing" :) Dunno about Blago, I've never been a great fan of his and I haven't seen him in many matches, but I tend to believe he's had at least some decent performances with Slavia.

As for Bulgarian players in Serbia, it's only a recent trend and Serbian managers should watch Bulgarian footballers more closely before buying: many players here are downright overestimated or rest on their laurels. There's a number of footballers in leading teams of our championship who'd be glad to wear the jersey of Zvezda or Partizan.

Players from all over the Balkans (excluding Greece and Turkey) are traditionally well represented in terms of quantity in Bulgaria and there's a lot of Serbs too, which is good, because you have great football academies and a lot of talented players.

The stars of our national team play in leading European clubs and domestic teams often have to compensate with foreigners. Though I'm happy to say they've began to rely more on the academies in recent years and this has had a good effect. Todor→Bozhinov 12:51, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:SCG - USA - Trening USA.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Nv8200p talk 13:22, 12 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Long time no chat :)

Have you heard anything about the deal between Црвена звезда and Real Madrid? I've recently read an article about it on JadranSport, perhaps we should add this into both articles? Just not sure where it would fit.

Also, would you happen to know anything about Talk:KFK Radnički Kragujevac? // Laughing Man 05:26, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding that list, I saw your comments on the talk page but just recently remembered to respond! I figured just to go ahead and make the changes, glad you think it's ok. Interesting regarding the Zvezda news, maybe best to wait and see about the news to see really the significance to the deal, I was thinking maybe you might have read something in the Serbian press/news about it which is why I asked before adding it. :)

I also went ahead and moved the article to FK Radnički Kragujevac as it did seem to make more sense (found some mentions on UEFA.com with this version of the name), but unfortunately the user who created the article was banned by an overzealous admin and I don't think he's returned since then. // Laughing Man 22:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#The_return_of_User:Panairjdde.2FUser:Kwame_Nkrumah_etc. if you wish to comment. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:53, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What origin is the Divac surname? According to your comment on Serbian surnames you said he wasn't Serb.

God Speed Jagoda 1 02:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What is Cincarsko? You would think Divac is a Serbian last names as it's probably only found in Serbia today.

It woulkd be a good guess that it is Serbian. Any proof??

The name doesn't sound Slavic, but i could be wrong. For all i know it could some very old Serbian name dating back a thousand years.

Jagoda 1 21:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Volunteers are being sought to help enforce the community ban on Panairjdde. I know that he's frequently crossed your path while editing, so I thought you might be interested. Drop by the page. Thanks! --Palffy 02:30, 26 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I was just wondering if the Svetlana Ražnatović article was still on your watchlist. I am attempting to make edits that ensure the article complies with the requirements of Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and there has also been some vandalism of the article by a frustrated editor. Any assistance you could give me would be greatly appreciated. Thank you, Satori Son 11:18, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vitriden,

Sometimes, you are too polite ;) Actually, I respect you for that, if everyone acted as you did, Wikipedia would be a much better place. So far, it seems you are the really the only current active knowledgeable editor of the Crvena zvezda article, so I think you should simply make changes as you think is best, and mention on article talk page. If these recent anons who are editing really wish to improve the article, and not just make some sort of point, they will join the discussion you started on the talk page, otherwise, I will try to help maintain the consensus version from discussion. // laughing man 14:02, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You posted to Matthead's discussion page on the subject of his changing all known references to West Germany to read Germany, as of the unified variety. You then said you do not understand him.

Have you heard of re-invention of history by those who would wish that the past had never happened in the way it did? I would suggest that this is the area of the editor's psyche you might need to examine, if only it were possible to do so. He's making a lot of work for those who are clear on the past and how it shaped up, by requiring reversions of his misguided edits for a large number of football articles.

There must be a more constructive and enjoyable way of editing, I would have thought. Best wishes. Ref ^(chew)(do) 21:25, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I did it because of the Wikipedia style guideline which suggests cleanup of articles where the list format is used instead of prose text. Simple as that. If we ever get separate articles on his advisors then a list of child articles links with only short explanation in the first article (Boris Tadic article) would be possible but for now this is the best option. --Avala 23:27, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Milan Biševac Goran Gavrančić Bora Milutinović East Germany national football team Three-finger salute (Serbian) Radio Television of Serbia Slobodan Rajković Paris Basket Racing Nenad Krstić Andorra national football team Football Association of Yugoslavia Bosansko Grahovo Dejan Milovanović Patrik Andersson Bosanski Brod Moldova national football team Bob Veith Nenad Jestrović Obrenovac

Cleanup Nikola Žigić Prijezda I Elevator Action Merge Geosynchronous satellite Blazer National Day Add Sources Squad rotation system Predrag Mijatović Proxy war Wikify Giorgio Armani Bogotazo Crime Story (TV series) Expand List of women's national football teams Jules Rimet Jeff Agoos

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 20:53, 2 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

On November 23, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dimitrije T. Leko, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 05:26, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

...but that's indeed how it's spelled on the list. ;) --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 12:58, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is "SERBIAN STRENGTH Movement-Bogoljub Karić". --PaxEquilibrium (talk) 17:13, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fsj-logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a spoksman of the United Nations. I tried to be diplomatic by writing "Serbian breakaway province of Kosovo" - and not even that is accepted by you Serbians..! --Camptown (talk) 17:30, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, "bordering Albania via the breakaway province of Kosovo" is at least much better than just ignoring what is currently going on in Kosovo because the UN Security Council is unable to reach unanimity. --Camptown (talk) 09:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have fixed everything you suggested on the map's talk page. Have a great day! - Thanks, Hoshie 22:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vitriden I have seen that you have reverted my edit. There is a difference between notable players and notable former players. Burzanović, Castillo and Gueye are alredy notable players in the squad. I didn't put there Barcos or Bronowicki (although he is a member of Poland national football team) and also Jestrović (notable at Anderleht) or Koroman. Making differencies between players from Serbia and Yugoslavia isn't so practical, but I didn't have beter idea how to do that (maybe you have). In this case I think that your revert wasn't right.Zrenjanin (talk) 10:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah Milovanovic an Basta are also notable players, not former but notable.Zrenjanin (talk) 10:44, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, we can agree to add just former players (notable) on the list. But also we must put flags beside players name or to write down country above player names. It is unusual that Mao Molina is in the middle of the list among all Serbian/Yugoslav footballers. Someone would think (not watching article about him) that he is born Serbian of etc. spanish descent :). Zrenjanin (talk) 17:38, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I hope that we will have a good cooperation on Red Star article. Cheers. Zrenjanin (talk) 17:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, WP:FLAGS says also flags should not be used in case of ambiguity, not used as simple decoration, and not overused. This is definitely Zeman's case, he was born in Prague, he is a Czech citizen who obtained Italian citizenship after getting married to a Sicilian woman, and he is widely recognized in Italy as a Czech with Italian citizenship. Two flags for a single name should be avoided where possible, so I think it's better to either use only the Czech flag or not to use any flag at all. Luiz Felipe Scolari owns Italian citizenship as well, but nobody has ever considered to use two flags to indicate his nationality. --Angelo (talk) 15:19, 17 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

U pravu si. Marina Tucaković je napisala deo teksta pesme "Valentino iz restorana". Međutim, nije radila na tekstu pesme "On i njegov BMW". Moja greška.

You were right. Marina Tucaković wrote part of "Valentino iz restorana" lyrics. She, however, did not work on "On i njegov BMW lyrics". My mistake.

Ostalocutanje —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ostalocutanje (talk • contribs) 10:23, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Fsj-logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:05, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I saw that you had edited by user page. I haven't given my self any barnstar, I just stored them there so I know where I can find them next time I want to award someone. Who knows, it may be you one day --NOAH (talk) 19:30, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uklonio sam (OPET!) Zorana Predina sa liste povezanih umetnika (associated acts) u članku o Bori Đorđeviću. To što se Bora 1989. godine pojavio kao gost na zajedničkom albumu Zorana Predina i Arsena Dedića Svjedoci priče (pevao sa njima u pesmi "Domovina") ne čini Zorana Predina "associated actom". Sa Aresnom Dedićem je, sa druge strane Bora imao jedan unplugged nastup u Sava Centru. Bootleg snimak tog nastupa pod nazivom Arsen & Bora Čorba unplugged '87 je široko rasprostranjen (mislim da je čak i objavljen od strane nekoliko diskografskih kuća, za Hi Fi Centar sam siguran) i često se smatra oficijalnim Borinim solo albumom, a o njemu postoje podaci (sa sve omotom) i na zvaničnom sajtu Riblje Čorbe... Eto odgovora na tvoje nedoumice ("sorry, but what links him to Dedic that doesn't link him to Predin? They were all together on one tour in 1987 and that's all. Either keep them both or remove them both, don't be inconsistent"). Ostalocutanje

Izvini što kasnim sa odgovorom... Ex YU Rock enciklopediju imam (doduše, samo izdanje koje obuhvata period 1960 - 2000), i ona mi je poslužila kao glavni izvor za većinu članaka koje sam napisao... Knjigu odlično poznajem. U članku o Lačni Franzu Bora se pominje triput:

1. 1986. godine se pojavio kao gost na njihovom koncertu u SKC-u, svirao je usnu harmoniku u pesmi "Nasviđenje na plaži".

2. 1989. godine se pojavio kao gost na zajedničkom albumu Zorana Predina i Arsena Dedića Svjedoci priče, gde je pevao u pesmi "Domovina".

3. Povodom izdavanja tog albuma organizovan je niz kabaretskih večeri na kojima su sva trojica nastupali.

1. Bora se pojavio kao gost-muzičar na JEDNOM koncertu benda.

2. Po ovom kriterijumu (tj. kada bi ovo uzeli kao kriterijum) među associated actsima u članku o Bori bi mogli da se nađu Bijelo Dugme, Balkan, Kerber, Rambo Amadeus, Bilja Krstić, Dejan Cukić, Vlada i Bajka, Zabranjeno Pušenje, Baja Mali Knindža, Braća sa Dinare, Minđušari, Bajone, Legende, Vožd, Delča, Aca Seltik, PS Baby Face... Ne moram da ti skrećem pažnju na to da bi neki od ovih bendova i muzičara (npr. Minđušari ili Bilja Krstić) imali mnogo više prava da se nađu na toj listi nego Zoran Predin.

3. Hm... Evo jednog prostog primera: 1986. godine na velikoj turneji koja je ponela ime Metal Rulz Tour našli su se zajedno Ozzy Osbourne, Lita Ford, Motley Crue, Iron Maiden, Poison i Judas Priest... Da li su svi oni jedni drugima associated acts?

U članku o Zoranu Predinu Bora se ne pominje ni jednom... E sad, kao što sam već rekao, ja imam samo drugo izdanje koje obuhvata period 1960 - 2000. Ne znam da li je Bora u periodu 2000 - 2006 sarađivao sa Predinom, ali u to ne verujem, jer su, koliko ja znam, u svađi (moguće zbog "Bečkih konjušara"). Znam da je Predin pre nekoliko godina "pružio Bori Đorđeviću ruku pomirenja", ali ne znam da li ju je Bora prihvatio... A čak i da jeste, sumnjam da je to dovelo do neke saradnje. U ostalom, da jeste, uveren sam da bih znao za to.

Još jednom: Bora sa Arsenom ima snimljen jedan poluzvaničan album - Arsen & Bora Čorba Unplugged '87. Ono što se na zapadu zove album artist bio bi (i jeste) Arsen Dedić & Bora Đorđević. Kao Jimmy Page & Robert Plant, Coverdale & Page... Ne znam... Laza Ristovski & Ipe Ivandić itd.--Ostalocutanje (talk) 18:31, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Videh tvoj članak Dimitrije T. Leko pa ako hoćeš bilo bi lepo da ga prevedeš za sr: Vikipediju. Ja sam napisao članak Marko T. Leko na srpskom i to dosta davno, a oni su vidim braća. Puno pozdrava. --Djordjes (talk) 20:54, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I finally found a source about him playing for Macedonian national basketball team. I just removed the fact because it was controversial. Sergiogr (talk) 19:17, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the message you recently left to 89.243.181.79 at Talk:Kent/Arsenal_Youth_Team_FC. Please remember: do not bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. Thank you. Booglamay (talk) - 21:35, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on my talk. Booglamay (talk) - 21:53, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Radio Television of Serbia Chuck Swirsky Momčilo Bajagić Football Federation of Macedonia Tight junction Galata Tower Milan Biševac Football Association of Albania Igor Matić Vedea River Dejan Milovanović Naruto Football Association of Slovenia Association of Football Federations of Azerbaijan Olympic Sports Centre Belgian Football Association Pionir Hall Faroe Islands Football Association Football Association of Yugoslavia

Cleanup Sport governing body 'Allo 'Allo! Julien Absalon Merge Military of Hungary Zahumlje Harvard National Model United Nations Add Sources Joaquín Malgosa Fevzi Elmas Kabaddi Wikify Serbian-American volunteers (1917) Pick and roll Catenaccio Expand Portuguese Football Federation Serbian Despotate Yandro Miguel Quintana

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- ForteTuba (talk) 11:51, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I used the information from the "List of indoor arenas" article thinking it was in order but if it isn't you can delete the list or make a new one on the "Belgrade Arena" article.

Template:Zvezdine zvezde has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. King of the North East 01:50, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Crvena Zveda U sekciji "Notable players" sam uklonio neke igrace koji ni pod kojim uslovima tu ne bi trebali da se nadju. Potom mi je stigla ova poruka od tebe: April 2009

The recent edit you made to Red Star Belgrade constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. --Vitriden (talk) 00:01, 21 April 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.93.231.198 (talk)

Zdravo, treba mi tvoja pomoc. Posto sam shvatio da si zvezdas, hteo sam da znam dali znas za nekog Williams brazilca koji je nabrajan kao zvezdin igrac koji je igrao na vecitim derbijima. Pretpostavljam da se pise Williams, jer ga je na srpskom neko napisao kao "brazilac Vilijams". Jel znas mozda kojih je godina igrao u Zvezdi. Hvala. FkpCascais (talk) 21:31, 17 June 2009 (UTC) Izgleda da je bio i neki Zivaldo ili Živaldo? Tako bar pise na nekom starom forumu... FkpCascais (talk) 13:49, 18 June 2009 (UTC) Ma setio sam ga se jer sam pravio one liste stranih igraca kod nas, pa te neke igrace moram bukvalno da iskopavam. Na netu nema bas skoro nista o nasim ligama iz 90ih a posto zivim u portugalu, ovde bas nemam nikakve informaciije o nasim ligama tih godina. FkpCascais (talk) 23:02, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Serbian surnames. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Serbian surnames. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:23, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2006–07 UEFA Champions League has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. – PeeJay 10:02, 3 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Swimming at the 2009 World Aquatics Championships – Women's 200m breaststroke at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 13:44, 5 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What about "This template is for articles which involve an article about an evolving current sports-related event which is either changing rapidly or about which understanding is rapidly evolving", "As an advisory to editors, it may also be used in those occasions that many editors (perhaps a hundred or more) edit an article on the same day" and "It is not intended to be used to mark an article that merely has recent news articles about the topic"? The article is mostly edited by you and a couple of other editors, and the editing isn't nearly enough to warrant a warning to our readers. --Conti|✉ 09:54, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are misunderstanding the purpose of the template. It is not supposed to be used on all articles that are about something currently ongoing, as confusing as it may sound. Basically, Template:Current (and its sister templates) was created to be put on articles that are changing rapidly and are being edited massively due to being a current event. 2009 Hudson River mid-air collision would be a recent example: New information gets public quickly, a lot of people edit the article, and the ensuing chaos is something that warrants a warning to our readers. The article might be unreliable, might contain false information or even vandalism. That's true for all our articles, of course, but in this case it is especially hard to keep the article free of such things. That something is merely ongoing does not make it a current event by our standards, because usually there is no such rapid editing going on. As for EuroBasket 2009 qualification, information is simply not changing rapidly in that sense. We know exactly when the games are being played, and there is no need to warn our readers that information will change while the games are being played, it's common sense to assume this. We should always think why we use these templates, and in this case there is no reason to warn anyone of anything. --Conti|✉ 12:10, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

To be honest, I never read the guidelines that way, but I can see now where you're coming from. I agree that the guidelines should be made a bit more clear in that regard. They were mostly copied over from Template:Current, and should probably be more specific towards sporting events (All sporting events change "rapidly", but that doesn't mean they all need a template, for instance). --Conti|✉ 16:01, 10 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Politika Front Page October 6 2000.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Damiens.rf 19:31, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ja sam fotografije sa događaja u Beogradskoj Areni postavio u galeriju ispod tabele održanih događaja, smatrao sam da je tako lepše i preglednije - mislim da pet fotografija poređanih jedna ispod druge sa tabelom ispod njih nije dovoljno pregledno i "lepo za oko", mada mislim da to i nije toliko bitno, ali me ipak zanima šta misliš o tome?

Što se tiče imena bendova, kada je o stranim bendova reč sve reči u imenu benda (osim veznika i članova) pišu se velikim slovima; tako je donekle i u Srbiji: imena bendovima se na omotima albuma (znači da bendovi sami sebi daju takva imena!), u literaturi (knjigama, časopisima) i sajtovima vezanim za rok scenu pišu sa velikim slovima. Te tradicije se ne pridržavaju najčešće mediji koji nisu strogo vezani za rock muziku, jer su se imena bendova, istina, tokom 60-ih, 70-ih i 80-ih pisala sa velikim slovom samo prve reči u nazivu, ali se u poslednje dve decenije, kad je o tome reč, okrećemo svetskim tredovima. Kada je O Wikipediji reč, mi koji radimo na člancima o domaćoj rock muzici uglavnom se držimo stranih kriterijuma:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Serbian_rock_music_groups

Dakle, ako je u samom članku o Čorbi "Č" veliko, i ako je tako u desetinama drugih članaka u kojima se pominje Riblja Čorba, mislim da ovaj članak ne bi trebalo da bude izuzetak.

Što se tiče koncerta Galije, evo samo prva dva izvora koja su se pojavila na Guglu:

http://www.mtsmondo.com/entertainment/gossip/text.php?vest=148171 http://www.smedia.rs/kultura/detalji.php?id=4361&naslov_vesti=Koncert%20grupe%20%22Galija%22%2017.%20decembra%20u%20Beogradskoj%20areni&linkurl=kultura&sekcija=Muzika

Ostalocutanje (talk) 00:30, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Što se tiče Galijinog koncerta, da budem iskren, izvore na Internetu, kada sam to postavio, nisam ni tražio - video sam reklamu na RTS-u.

• Kada je reč o imenima bendova: svestan sam pravila koje propisuje naš pravopis (to mi je struka, tj. biće), i iako nisam čitao nov pravopis, gotovo sam siguran da u njemu ne postoji deo koji se odnosi na imena rock grupa. :) Smatram da tu treba uzeti u obzir stav samog benda, tj. kako oni pišu svoje ime na svojim izdanjima, sajtovima itd. (što opet može biti problem ako su u logou benda sva slova mala - riblja čorba ili bijelo dugme - ili velika - samo mi AZRA i KERBER trenutno padaju na pamet - što je često slučaj). Poslednjih godina mladi bendovi svoja imena pišu, u skladu sa engleskim, recimo "običajima" - iako moje znanje engleskog nije na najnižem nivou, nisam siguran da pravopis dozvoljava pisanje imenica, glagola, prideva, zamenica i brojeva u imenima bendova, njihovih albuma i pesama velikim slovom - sa velikim slovima - što i nije čudno, budući da su imena dobrog dela njih na engleskom. Međutim, bednovi su to radli i pre prodiranja ovakvog "trenda" - trenutno mi na pamet pada samo Rok Mašina. Po nekoj analogiji bi se i imena starijih bendova pisala tako (i, kao što več rekoh, pišu se u literaturi i na sajtovima čija je primarna tema muzika). Još jednom - mislim da, ako smo već rešilli - kada kažem "mi" mislim na nas koji radimo pretežno na člancima o jugoslovenskoj rock muzici, što ne znaći da mi na te članke imamo monopol - da se toga drržimo, trebalo bi da tako bude na svim stranicama.

• Kad je reč o rasporedu fotografija, već sam rekao: mislim da je ovako nepregledno, i nedovoljno "lepo za oko". Meni smetaju članci na kojima nije usklađen raspored fotografija sa tekstom - istina: primarna funkcija članka je davanje informacija i estetika nije najvažnija, ali zašto se ne pozabaviti i njome. Često, bar meni, članci sa neskladnim rasporedom slika deluju pomalo neozbiljno, ali kao što sasm već rekao, to mi ne smeta previše i smatram da nije najbitnije. Ostalocutanje (talk) 14:13, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice it before, it was put by some pan-Serb a few days before. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 18:11, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK vidim da razumiješ srpskohrvatski :) Stvar je u tome da je besmisleno naturati Andrićevo srpstvo tijekom cijeloga života ("always"), kad se je dotični u barem nekoliko navrata deklarirao kao Hrvat.. Uostalom, cijela njegova etnička pozadina je podosta elaborirana u članku, pa ni nema previše mjesta za tako lakonski zbunjujuće tvrdnje iznsene u zagradama (kao onako, "usput"). --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 18:15, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Miljenko Mihić at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! (Note: I always leave approvals to others.) Art LaPella (talk) 01:35, 22 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've added some comments at T:TDYK. Sorry for late reviews. Materialscientist (talk) 05:38, 28 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vitriden! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Milorad Mišković - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Nevenka Tadić - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:20, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You made some kind of a mistake I am not an editor on Wikipedia I just look at pages. This is probably cuz of my country's IP changes... --93.86.164.39 (talk) 14:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caos, izvini sto te cimam, al moram da te pitam, sta mislis, dal ce ta tekma da se racuna kao zvanicna za podatke i statistiku ili ne? Ja mislim da ne, ali nisam siguran... To je bila prijateljska (tipa exhibition match), igrali samo igraci iz nase lige a nije ni Anta trenirao. Znas nesto o tome kako je tretirati, i dali upisivati igracima tekmu kao "A international appereance"? FkpCascais (talk) 20:15, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ma jeste to od pomoci, a i upravo si uporedio sa slicnom (da ne kazem, identicnom) situacijom na Millenium kupu. Bas zato se ovoga i pitam, jer je recimo sajt Reprezentacija.rs ignorisao na spisku reprezentativaca igrace koji su samo igrali na tom turniru (Jovan Tanasijević, Dragoljub Jeremić, Dejan Osmanović, Miloš Kruščić, Milan Belić, Vladan Kostić, Ivan Ilić i Vojin Prole su igrali za repku samo na tom turniru, i nema ih na spisku reprezentativaca) a drugi koji su igrali i na turniru a i na drugim reprezentativnim, nisu im se upisale utakmice sa turnira: primer, Žarko Lučić je bio golman na 4 od 5 utakmica na Millenium kupu primer , a u licnoj statistici ovde, ima upisanu samo 1 utakmicu za reprezentaciju Lucic&period=20002000 ovde, jednu prijateljsku utakmicu protiv Rumunije. I tako svim ostalima, znači, na tom sajtu (saznao sam da sajt nije zvanican) ne racunaju utakmice sa Millenium kupa. Ali sa ove utakmice su uracunate u pojedinacne statistike igraca, pa ja cu im upisati i dodati "Category:Serbia international footballers" pa ako bude trebalo posle cu izbrisati... FkpCascais (talk) 02:58, 10 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BACK OFF. You have come to my talk page and have vandalized it, calling me a mental idiot. This is not the serbian wikipedia, so stick to english, and stop your verbal abuse. (LAz17 (talk) 13:14, 12 May 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

I told you once to stop writing Serbocroatian on my talk page. Why do you continue? (LAz17 (talk) 14:08, 12 May 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Nadam se da je seronja zadovoljan - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Red_Star_Belgrade#Requested_move Totalno bekoristno odlaganje. Ako je pravilo da se sece ruka ti ces da seces ruku. Usko vidjenje, ko policajcki, vecina koji su i onako sa pola mozga. (LAz17 (talk) 15:12, 12 May 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Ko je reko da su svi glupi? Ako nema nijedan realan razlog protiv toga, onda nema razlog da se kontrira. Nikom nije smetalo. Samo si ti odlucio da zapnes oko te gluposti. (LAz17 (talk) 15:46, 12 May 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

I did not tell you to follow any rule. I do not think that everyone else is an idiot. It seems to me that most people want it to be FK Crvena Zvezda, which makes the most sense. The main argument of the people who want it as "Red Star Belgrade" are misguided people who came to believe that that is the official name in english - when in fact the official english website of the club calls it "FK Crvena Zvezda". Granted that their main argument is a red herring, there really is no need for any other discussion. Plus, on the basis that there are many Red Star Belgrade sport clubs, I see no reason to move that page to go directly to the soccer page, when it can potentially redirect to dozens of pages. (LAz17 (talk) 14:27, 12 May 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Now, all of that makes perfect sense to me. You should have said it that way the first time and none of this would have happened. I just want everyone to follow the procedure, because that way everyone has a chance to say their opinion. I think it's the most important goal of wikipedia - to hear out everyone's opinion and then extract, out of those opinions, something that looks like the truth. If all the people just say they are right, there is no place for compromise and wikipedia can not work that way. There were four move proposals in the last three years. Dozens of people said their pros and cons, and you can't be that disrespectful to them to say you know the best. Nobody can, me neither. It would be good if we had someone who has an absolute knowledge on any subject, but in that case we wouldn't need wikipedia, we would just ask him/her/you. This way, we have to stick to what we have, until we think of something better.

By the way, I've never called you an idiot. Read more carefully. I've said you could be considered an idiot by someone looking at what you do, without listening to what I had to say. You must respect other people if you want other people to respect you. Simple as that. Now that we talk like normal people, I want to apologize if I've offended you. Bye.--Vitriden (talk) 16:31, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Caos, vidi, razmisljao sam i ja puno o tome, ali sam dosao do zakljucka da kod karijera igraca (narucito u infoboxovima ili drugim spiskovima) ime "Red Star Belgrade" je mnogo upadljivije, a iskreno da ti kazem , mislim da "Crvena Zvezda" ce se izgubiti u moru cudnih imena manjih klubova u "njima" cudnim ligama i zemljama... A ima jos jedan plus: mogu da se kladim da sama cinjenica da ima rec "Belgrade" ce vec dosta da kaze odakle je Zvezda, jer mogu da se kladim da vise od 50% posetioca wiki nema pojma da je Zvezda iz Srbije, pa "Belgrade" tu pomaze... Cak sam za to da i "FK Partizan" se pise "Partizan Belgrade"... Veruj mi, razmisljam iskljucivo o sto efikasnijem imidzu i da bude sto lakse laicima da shvate odmah odakle je klub (da je nas!). Poz! :) FkpCascais (talk) 23:16, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 in wiki wars is about to start. Kidding, lol. [1], we could at least move it to FC Red Star Belgrade. (LAz17 (talk) 21:20, 21 May 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Aww come on bro. Please?

Pretty please? (LAz17 (talk) 05:03, 22 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Pretty pretty please? (LAz17 (talk) 05:04, 22 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Pretty pretty please with chocolate on top? (LAz17 (talk) 05:05, 22 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Pretty pretty pretty please with chocolate and a cherry on top? (LAz17 (talk) 05:06, 22 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Pretty pretty pretty please with chocolate, a cherry, and sprinkles? (LAz17 (talk) 05:07, 22 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Pretty, pretty, pre... (LAz17 (talk) 05:08, 22 May 2010 (UTC))[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there,

This has now been protected as you requested for 1 month - feel free to request further protection when it expires if there is more vandalism, or if you believe the page should be protected for longer, feel free to send me a message.

Hope this helps,

The Helpful One 12:11, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reverted version doesn't make sense. Bulgaria's goal average is not what shown in the table, and it's inferior to that of France, so the latter should have qualified instead of Bulgaria.--Nitsansh (talk) 22:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bulgaria's points were miscalculated, but it's still inferior to France.--Nitsansh (talk) 22:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Were Hungary's totals included? –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 03:20, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did my own calculations and BUL was higher than FRA. I also recalculated ISR and it was off by .0001 (probably a rounding error). –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 03:43, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So eventually the results against Hungary do count... otherwise it wouldn't make sense...--Nitsansh (talk) 15:11, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I think UEFA's precedent of not counting the last-placed team in World Cup qualifying must've confused the people. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 18:11, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What UEFA and FIFA World Cup has to do with FIBA and EuroBasket? Different sports, different governing bodies, different rules.--Nitsansh (talk) 21:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The logic? Since more games = more points so they can't use points to compare teams that played different number of games. So they used winning percentage instead. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 05:29, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Vitriden, I noteced you fixed Mile Kos at OFK Beograd coache section. Recently, another editor asked me if I could find the name of D.Milić who coached OFKa just a bit later. Duško? Stubbornly all sources I could find name him only as D.Milic, any idea? Best regards! FkpCascais (talk) 18:58, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ohoho, pa Mile Kos je bio golman Jugoslavije, Zvezde, Metalca (OFK-e) i Proletera. Super clanak, narocito je interesantan deo koji govori o odnosu klubova pre i posle drugog svetskog rata. Kaze "okupacione vlasti su zabranile Jugoslaviju, pa smo igrali kao SK 1913". Znao sam za tu promenu imena, ali nisam znao razlog. Bas sam sad u skorasnje vreme gledao da sto vise poboljsam clanke o tom predratnom periodu. Pomogla mi je knjiga Zivka Bojanica "BSK - Jugoslavija, secanja na prvi Beogradski Veciti Derbi" a i sklopio sam nekako clanak Sándor Nemesa, vaznog nama jer je pod imenom Antal Nemes kao trener osvojio grdne titule sa BSK-om. Pokusao sam sto bolje, za pocetak, da stvorim neke clanke predratnih prvoligaskih klubova kao SK Jedinstvo Beograd, NAK Novi Sad, SAND Subotica, ŽAK Subotica... Prevescu uskoro i sa nase viki clanak o manje bitnoj Jugoslaviji iz Jabuke koji je igrao u 1940-41 Serbian League, a probacu nesto da uradim i sa drugim nasim prvoligaskim klubovima bez clanka. Trebali bi sto vise da poboljsamo Jugoslaviju i BASK (predratni period, Soko), a u OFKinom clanku nedostaje BSK-ov predratni period, i morali bi da ga unesemo. Generalno, trudicu se da sto vise nadjem podataka iz tog perioda koji je bio potpuno zanemaren. Ako imas ideje kako bi ovo najbolje izveli, kazi i dodaj gde god vidis da nesto fali. Mislim, nije nista hitno... Ako mozes da mi posaljes monografiju vrlo bi je rado primio. Moze preko viki mejla? FkpCascais (talk) 03:27, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vitriden. I am a little confused by BOTH versions contained in this caption[2], the not vs now issue. What happened was, I had edited the article to give it your original choice, then amended one word. What I was thinking of precisely baffles me now. When in English we say would go on to do something it implies a future time, so now could be correct. Would not recognise means that recognition would never come. I wasn't thinking along that line of logic, I was amending POV language from a previous edit and I wanted to say that Slobodan Milošević would not recognise the results of the election IMMEDIATELY. By saying "now", it implies just that and the man is dead! To say "would not originally acknowledge but was forced to after the revolt" is equally long. I think the best thing to say he, "which he would LATER acknowledge". That in itself surmises everything, that he didn't originally and that he did eventually. What's your thought? Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 15:51, 6 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OSK Igalo squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Kosm1fent 09:45, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, in effect in second round Serbia beat Belarus, and if France beat belarus (i hope) France first Serbia second and belarus third. TKS. I change on WP:fr. Bserin (talk) 14:49, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Marina Maljković at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Prioryman (talk) 23:02, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, these type of information are required only in the first paragraph of 'Tournament Article' (like 2013 Wimbledon Championships), not in 'Event Article' (like 2013 Wimbledon Championships – Men's Singles). TheLightBlue (talk) 08:54, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Brilliant Idea Barnstar
	For a great way to solve a dispute. Bravo! :) WhiteWriterspeaks 22:57, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Marina Maljković at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! BlueMoonset (talk) 16:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's been over a week with no action. Please respond soon. It would be a shame for this not to be promoted to the main page due to a couple of missing source citations. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:40, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you've started editing again. Some sort of response needs to be made the next time you edit, or the nomination will, regretfully, be closed. I very much hope we hear from you. BlueMoonset (talk) 06:15, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vitriden, I'm contacting you because we need some Serbian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on sr.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Serbian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 22:45, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of events held in Kombank Arena is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of events held in Kombank Arena until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. P 1 9 9  ✉ 16:47, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm trying to avoid another edit war with a certain editor and would like to properly get content restored to an article. Could you comment on whether it'd be appropriate to do so at this discussion? Dan56 (talk) 00:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Praška filmska škola at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 23:09, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

— Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Red Star Belgrade in European football, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Champions League (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Zdravo Vitriden, I wanted to ask you if you could contribute to Cinema of Serbia? One fellow editor and myself have worked a bit on the page and we would love if you could join us and add some information and references (Praška filmska škola and what not). thank you kindly, Sadkσ (talk is cheap) 19:51, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since List of deaths due to COVID-19 has been questionably nominated for deletion, your opinion on the discussion page would be useful. --Pesqara (talk) 23:06, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article European Arenas Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There is no actual claim of notability here, and nothing but directory/database hits to verify the information. No secondary sources; no notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Drmies (talk) 15:20, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]