A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2014 Eurocup Mégane Trophy season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2014 Eurocup Mégane Trophy season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.. Cybervoron (talk) 14:21, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Kevin Magnussen may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• that the son of former Formula One driver [[Jan Magnussen]] would drive for McLaren in 2014.<ref>{cite news|title=McLaren decides that Magnussen will replace Perez in 2014 F1 season|url=http://www.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:44, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2014 NASCAR Nationwide Series may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |align="left"| [[Jeremy Clements Racing|#51]] [[Tony Clements (NASCAR team owner|Tony Clements]]
• |align="left"| [[TriStar Motorsports|#14]] [[Mark Smith (NASCAR team owner|Mark Smith]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:15, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 NASCAR K&N Pro Series West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Mayhew (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2014 NASCAR K&N Pro Series West, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Mayhew. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of TC3 International Series, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.tc3internationalseries.com/news/item/tc3-international-series-announced-for-2015.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 23:59, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 Fórmula Truck season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Autódromo Internacional Ayrton Senna. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2014 Blancpain GT Series season page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on the allegations made here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vettelisthebest. Tiptoety ^talk 10:35, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vettelisthebest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My brother likes to bully me so he acted like I was sockpuppeting (I do not know if I can use it as a verb), so it was not me. I am always using Vettelisthebest when editing a page, not my IP address. I am really really sorry this happened, really sorry, but my brother did not say he did it and I did not notice it. I have made the 2015 Dutch Supercar Challenge season page, the 2014 and 2015 Blancpain GT Series season pages and the 2014 and 2015 NASCAR K&N Pro Series East/West, NASCAR Whelen (Southern) Modified Tour, NASCAR Canadian Tire Series and NASCAR Toyota/Mexico Series pages and I edit them almost always as soon as possible. I am really terribly sorry this happened, but as you can see I have done a lot on Wikipedia (at least, that is how I see it) and you can see I do it very seriously. Please please unblock me, I'm really terribly sorry.

Decline reason:

Your brother seems to have quite a history of bullying you by agreeing with you and reinstating your edits that someone else removed. See WP:LITTLEBROTHER. Huon (talk) 01:21, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vettelisthebest (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My brother knows what sockpuppeting is and he wanted to get my account blocked. This is not fun for me either. I am really sorry this happened and I will do anything to make it right. As you can see I am a serious guy when it comes to editing pages. I do a lot for the lower NASCAR series on Wikipedia and the Blancpain GT and Dutch Supercar Challenge. I am really sorry, really really really sorry and I will do anything to make sure that this will never ever happen again, but I really have know idea what is expected from me now...

Decline reason:

Looks like your "brother" made unblocking this account not possible because it's now compromised. Max Semenik (talk) 06:52, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2015 NASCAR K&N Pro Series East, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Byron. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:14, 5 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm User:MC12GT1 I'd like to help you by adding last results in Team's Standings, but I don't wnat to replace your work. Maybe we could plan our next work

Hey, MaseratiMC12 here. I'd like to create the Teams' Standings for the 2013 season. Would you like to help with your revision? I'm buildng up the top 10 to begin, in my Sandbox1. Hi! MC12GT1 (talk) 14:49, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2016 FIA World Rallycross Championship season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 FIA World Rallycross Championship season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QueenCake (talk) 21:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Corvus tristis (talk) 12:56, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vettelisthebest. You have new messages at Talk:2015 Blancpain Endurance Series season#Drivers' Standings.
Message added 03:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Corvus tristis (talk) 03:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on 2015 Blancpain Endurance Series season. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.
Okay, enough is enough. I'm giving this warning to both you and your opponent. If either editor reverts again without extensive discussion, I will seek blocks against both of you. If the other editor will not discuss, consider the recommendations made here. TransporterMan (TALK) 06:33, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2015 Blancpain GT Series season page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:2015_NASCAR_Sprint_Cup_Series#Broadcast_networks_tables. Thanks. – Nascar1996 ^{(talk • cont)} 01:53, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have seen season articles on my watchlist being moved for some time now. Perhaps if you want to expedite the process and cover other seasons that have not been moved, you should move them yourself. There are several hundred season articles that require moves, so "a week" is not sufficient time to claim that nothing is being done. I am well aware of the discussion, which is why I undid your move. The³5₉ (Talk) 04:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:QueenCake has been clearing the backlog a bit recently with some smaller past series. Your notion that "all articles should be moved immediately or none at all" will never ever happen because of the time consuming process of moving all these articles. It is not something we can do with a bot. The³5₉ (Talk) 05:06, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The speed at which the changes are being made does not allow you to suddenly undo what work has been done. It is absolutely not a legitimate reason to make the moves that you made. If you don't agree with the changes, then they should be discussed. Simply moving them because you feel it is right is not seeking consensus. The³5₉ (Talk) 05:25, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Because nobody said anything for a week, I thought everybody said what they wanted to say, so I made the decision to change it back the way it was..." This is not what you stated in your edit summary of your moves to several season articles, instead stating that you were simply moving them because not every other season had been moved. Further, the number of people stating for or against is insignificant, Wikipedia is not a WP:VOTE. The³5₉ (Talk) 18:31, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mass moving pages is a time consuming process. Since everyone here is a volunteer, and can only work when the time allows them to, the process will be done when it's done. If that takes a year so be it, the pace of progress is not a legitimate reason to go against consensus. Claiming that only one season of a series was moved, and then going on to move other seasons based on that example, as you did with the GP3 Series, appears to be remarkably bad faith. QueenCake (talk) 17:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Read the whole discussion again, and note people's opinions, not just those who added in the vote section. There were at least a dozen contributors, plus other editors like Rpo.castro and Corvus tristis that moved pages following the discussion, and it was only you and The Bushranger who were expressibly against it. Falcadore moved pages after there were no initial objections, then stopped doing so once an objection was made. After the discussion petered out for a second time, as it often does when all points have been made, and a general consensus for the change was demonstrated, myself and other editors began to move pages again. QueenCake (talk) 18:02, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion is no less valuable than mine or any other editor. Consensus is formed through strength of arguments and the views of the participating editors, and in this case there was simply no proper reasoning provided as to why the tautology introducing "season" was required. No one was objecting to the fact that "Championship/Cup/Series" is part of the name, but that did not provide an argument as to why 2016 GP2 Series is not the correct name for an article covering the 2016 GP2 Series. Following the article title policy, a good name is recognisable, natural, precise, concise and consistent. The title 2016 GP2 Series matches the first four, and will be consistent with other articles once the moves are completed. On the other hand, 2016 GP2 Series season is neither natural (due to the tautology of series season), precise (season implies all GP2 racing) or concise. QueenCake (talk) 20:57, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but this is English grammar - you cannot have an opinion on it, it is either right or wrong. "Series season" are two words that effectively mean the same thing, read up on Tautology (grammar) if you're unsure. As for effort, well that is the choice of anyone who volunteers to undertake a task. You are under no obligation to participate if you choose not to.

If you really wish to reopen the discussion, it will be more worthwhile to go to the WT:Motorsport page, rather than continuing a conversation between the two of us privately. QueenCake (talk) 22:43, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And, not for nothing - I do wish you would stop misrepresenting me. There was a consensus formed BEFORE you got involved. As is often the way editors pay scant attention to discussion pages so when things get decided while they are not paying attention is not something I should be blamed for.

Now that does not mean a consensus can not be re-evaluated because of new opinions, which you provided and the process paused at that point.

You want to make an objection, fine go ahead, but don't go around saying I've been doing stuff against consensus when I have done nothing of the kind. --Falcadore (talk) 19:31, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well you could have contributed by editing the entry list to match your idea, deleting it helps nobody.

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the 2016 24H Series page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vettelisthebest. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Robvanvee. Vettelisthebest, thanks for creating 2017 Blancpain GT Series Endurance Cup!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The article could use more references. Otherwise good job!

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Robvanvee 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is only one thing certain about this championship, which is the schedule. That means there is only one reference needed for now. The reference leads to the website of the championship. Vettelisthebest (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for any issues that have happened on the home track pages. I have simply been trying to edit it to the best of my ability and have only once edited in something not from the home tracks official page, that being Harrison Burton being confirmed by multiple other sources. Thanks for the notification though.

Yellowcat5 (talk) 00:16, 28 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the incovenience on home track pages too. I was just trying to help editing K&N East preliminary entry list for Bristol race. The entry list was updated after my edits. I will let you handle Home Tracks pages from now. Thanks for the notification and sorry to give you more work.

Lukscheese (talk) 16:35, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since you're handling PWC stuff, I was wondering when you were going to tabulate the points from both rounds?Gaeaman787 (talk) 03:47, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that the flags were an interesting addition because the 2016 season did have a lot more nationalities than usual in NASCAR. — Preceding unsigned comment added by JoeyofthePriuses (talk • contribs) 21:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article 2016 Sepang 12 Hours has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources to prove that this particular race was any more notable than the other 16 for which there is just 1 other page which is as poor in secondary sources as this one

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Domdeparis (talk) 16:02, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please report them to an administrative noticeboard if they continue vandalising/making bold edits and edit warring to keep them. The user warning system will help you to show that warnings have been given and once you have given them four, report them to WP:AIV. jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:55, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this user reverting your restoration of their user talk page; please note that users are permitted to remove posts from their own user talk page; doing so is considered an acknowledgement of the message. 331dot (talk) 20:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No its not hard to do the PWC stuff, but this weekend is Round 9 for everone...Gaeaman787 (talk) 01:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disregard, I completely forgot that Road America didn't count as a round *facepalmGaeaman787 (talk) 01:04, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As I had stated in the edit, Kenny Murillo, not Ken Murillo, won in TCA at COTA, hence why I eliminated the link to Ken Murillo.Gaeaman787 (talk) 00:00, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still unsure as to why you're reverting the page back to Ken Murillo's page when he never raced at COTA. His son, Kenny Murillo, drove the No. 33 Mazda. http://www.racer.com/mazda-motorsports/item/143073-murillo-racing-joins-pwc-with-mx-5. Also is there something factualy wrong with my edits for Sonoma? If so, just tell me. Gaeaman787 (talk) 00:15, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! In Wikipedia we have a consensus not to use all capital letters when it is not an abbreviation, even if it is used in the entry list by the championship promoters. Please read MOS:ALLCAPS which is part of the WP:MOSCAPS more carefully. Cheers. Corvus tristis (talk) 18:28, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you call my edits "vandalistic", why did you put those "ineligible" teams in the official points standings in the first place? You never told me they were ineligible teams, and you never listed them as ineligible. Also, everything else I put in the table was correct information, so why are you getting rid of ALL of it only to put it back with just a few changes? And why are you blaming the mistakes on me when clearly you are the one who falsified the standings and misled me. Johannes275 (talk) 13:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, don't call me wrong, when it is YOU who updated all of the teams' championships after Spa incorrectly. You only just put all the "ineligible" teams in, and you angrily undid my edits as if I didn't know that. Well clearly you didn't know that because YOU never mentioned anything about teams being ineligible to score points in the edit in which you updated the teams championships. In shorter words, you put falsified information into the page to begin with, and got angry at me for adding information according to that edit, when it is YOU who left the correct information out and didn't tell me. You should've put the "teams ineligible to score points" in a month ago when you updated all of the teams championship's results. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johannes275 (talk • contribs) 13:49, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK fine, I am an idiot.

The reason I left it incomplete is because I wanted you to help me complete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johannes275 (talk • contribs) 11:24, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware that I make mistakes, but I assure you I will be working on it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johannes275 (talk • contribs) 13:32, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Johannes here, and it has just come to my attention that the 2017 IGTC Driver's championship table hasn't been updated at all. As you are the person best qualified to handle complex edits like that, could you do that please after the California 8 Hours is over? - Johannes275

Vettelisthebest, Im Sorry, I'm trying not to Vandalise, I know in the past up til now I was a bit out of control and made many mistakes which I'm trying to fix. I always feel ashamed with myself every time I vandalise. But I'm now learning from my mistakes and hope I can be a better editor in the future.

Again, Im Sorry. From 86.178.75.65

Please be advised that some of the points are incorrect. Drivers taking part in the 2017 GT4 European Series Northern Cup for the first time after round 4 were not eligible to score points, yet you have attributed some to them (e.g. Willem Meijer and Caitlin Wood in Silver Cup).

I apologize for my sloppiness, Vettelisthebest. As I've told you before, I am working on it. - Johannes275 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johannes275 (talk • contribs) 12:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Vettelisthebest. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

At this point in time, the only AKKA ASP car to have a confirmed lineup is the #88. The reader will wonder what "No. 87, 89 and 90" are referring to because none of those numbers have a lineup yet, and none of them are listed on the AKKA ASP Team.

Really!!! "If I see you vandalising a page that I'm working on again, I'll let administrators know." DO WHAT YOU HAVE TO DO ;) Mario Silvas

Hello, Johannes275 here. I just got one question. Why do you remove ALL edits that multiple people who have less skill than you (including yours truly) have spent a lot of time on to be correct? A) you do realize you could just "revert" to the version you want, and B) these edits are factually correct, I don't see what good removing them is gonna do if all you want to do instead is do EXACTLY what they did before you, only cleaner. Just a few things I wanted to point out.

Thanks

Can you stop being an asshole and just try to accept the fact that, MAYBE, there are people out there who aren't as skilled at editing as you, and that maybe they shouldn't be blamed for it, which you seem to do to LITERALLY EVERYBODY. Wikipedia is supposed to be a civilized, fun place where anyone can contribute, and you seem to be taking the "fun" out of that. Look, I KNOW I am not that good at editing. But who are you to get mad at me for that?

If something annoys you, maybe spend less time getting mad at the person who did it and spend more time getting to work on creating the version YOU want to see.

P.S, you say you're "reverting all the edits"... that's not what I mean. If there are a lot of edits to a page you don't like, don't waste your time undoing every single one of them. I hope you know that the easiest thing to do is literally revisit the version of the page you want, click the edit bar, and then click "save changes." That way the CURRENT page automatically reverts to the version you want, without showing a thousand undone edits in the edit log, which you've been doing literally all the time you see edits you don't like.

Response to what you just said in my talk page: OK Maybe I was a bit ticked off there. But all I'm saying is....people make mistakes! They shouldn't be blamed all the time for it. I make mistakes a lot, but that doesn't change the fact that through these mistakes I'm still trying to put in the correct information for an encyclopedia. You don't need to spend time saying to everyone who does things edit-by-edit rather than all in one edit that they are "creating vandalism" because, some of them aren't trying to do that at all.

P.S. I never get a message telling me that one of my edits is undone.

Hello, Johannes275 here. Sorry to bother you, but I'd just like to notify you that the driver's championships for the 2018 WeatherTech Championship page have not been updated since Belle Isle, almost two months ago. I'm notifying you specifically because you update the driver's standings in a way that isn't done by anybody else, and only you know how to do it properly. For this reason I respectfully request, when you have the time, that you please update the driver's championships. Thank you for your understanding.

- Johannes275

Hello, Vettelisthebest. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings from Earth, So turns out that SROA did designate the non-Am cars into the "Pro" category, but they never bothered putting it on the initial entry list...So the Sprint Categories will be Pro and Am, not Pro-Am/Am. Also Shane Lewis is being moved into Pro. Gaeaman787 (talk) 19:59, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The Generation AMR SuperRacing Aston is not a guest entry in Pro-Am ineligible to score points, but officially "invite class" as per official entry list. Car is therefore also not shown on the official class results of any session, just overall. SpeedRacer88 (talk) 21:52, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would like an explanation as to why you removed my edit from 2019 NASCAR K&N Pro Series East. Keeping with standards with other NASACR series pages inside the United States, and because the page is presumably viewed by primarily an American audience, I added the mdy template. All other information that was changed and/or added is easily sourced back to the NASACR Home Tracks website. I have undone your removal for now, as it is my understanding that edits that are not blatantly vandalism should be allowed to stand and a discussion of said content should take place, gaining consensus before it is removed. Since you did not leave an edit summary explaining the removal of content, I have no guesses as to what you deemed bad about them besides the fact that they're someone else's contributions and not your own. A reply would be much appreciated to help me gain a deeper understanding of the situation. Willsome429 (say hey or see my edits!) 00:49, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, just wanted to let you know that I did a little bit of editing for Riverhead's race this past weekend. I'll let you take care of the rest (full finishing order and points), but I thought I'd jump in since I didn't see it updated after Saturday night. If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to me on my talk page. Have a good night! Mandoli (talk) 04:48, 11 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on 2016 Global RallyCross Championship, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Lightbluerain (talk) 15:11, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The SD tag has been removed. David notMD (talk) 18:52, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm SimplyLouis27. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. SimplyLouis27 (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]