Welcome!

Hello, Urməvi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Mishae (talk) 17:55, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing the sourced information and calling it "Armenian vandalism". --Երևանցի ^talk 19:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. --Երևանցի ^talk 19:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.  Mark Arsten (talk) 17:54, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive and non-sourced edits or you will probably get blocked like you did before. You have 10 minutes to remove your edit or i will contact an admin. You have also broken the The three-revert rule like you did before and got blocked for. --HistoryofIran (talk) 18:18, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notice: Under the terms of Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2, any editor who edits articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area in an aggressive point of view manner marked by incivility may be placed under several editing restrictions, by notice on that editor's talk page. This notice is to inform you that based on your edits, you are hereby placed under the following restrictions:

1. Revert limitation (formerly known as revert parole). You are limited to one revert per page per week, excepting obvious vandalism, and are required to discuss any content reversions on the page's talk page.
2. Supervised editing (formerly known as probation). You may be banned by any administrator from editing any or all articles which relate to the region of Turkey, Armenia, Azerbaijan and Iran and the ethnic and historical issues related to that area should you fail to maintain a reasonable degree of civility in your interactions with one another concerning disputes which may arise.
3. Civility supervision (formerly known as civility parole). If you make any edits which are judged by an administrator to be uncivil, personal attacks, or assumptions of bad faith, then you may be blocked for a short time of up to one week for repeat transgressions.

Enforcement: Violations of limitations, supervision, or bans imposed by the remedies in this case may be enforced by brief blocks of up to a week in the event of repeat violations. After 5 blocks the maximum block period shall increase to one year.

Note: This notice is not effective unless given by an administrator and logged here.

Specifically, this warning is being given to you due to edit warring, as well as repeated and unnecessary focus on what you perceive the ethnicity of other editors to be. This type of behavior is not acceptable and will lead to sanctions. If you disagree with another editor, engage in a civil discussion with them and seek dispute resolution if you cannot come to an agreement. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:25, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Saib Tabrizi". Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 21:44, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Come and discuss here[1] about the Saib Tabrizi. --HistoryofIran (talk) 09:45, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Urməvi. You have new messages at Talk:Saib Tabrizi#Claims with no sources..
Message added --HistoryofIran (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)b. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

HistoryofIran (talk) 16:26, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@Urməvi: I've asked twice that you please discuss this matter. I'm going to go ahead and make the change I've described above. If you revert without responding here, then I'm going to have to file a complaint against you at ANI for disruptive editing. — HistoryofIran (talk) 12:21, 27 October 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Afshar tribe. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 20:13, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Urməvi. You have new messages at Talk:Aylar Lie#Disruptive edits by Urməvi.
Message added 19:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

HistoryofIran (talk) 19:24, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Urməvi, I note that you have been asked several times to come and discuss your edits. You have failed to do so. This is not acceptable behavior. If another editor expresses concern with an edit, it is expected that you will hold a calm discussion with them.

Areas subject to ethnic conflicts are often especially susceptible to inflamed tempers. If you continue to edit inappropriately in these areas, you will be banned from editing in these areas, or blocked from editing entirely. This is a collaborative project, and an aggressive approach, including refusal to discuss, is not acceptable. Please consider this your final warning to moderate your conduct and show willingness to discuss your edits before sanctions are imposed. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 18:42, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:16, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Urməvi, as you have continued to edit disruptively and aggressively despite several warnings and a previous block, it is clear that you are not here to build an encyclopedia, but rather to edit in an aggressive and partisan manner, without regard to our requirements of civil collaboration. Accordingly, you have been blocked from editing indefinitely. If you would like your editing privileges to be restored, you will need to commit to discussing edits you do not agree with rather than aggressively edit warring, and to doing so in a respectful and calm manner, rather than repeatedly reverting all over the place. If you cannot or will not commit to this, then this is not the right project for you and you will not be allowed to edit. You may appeal this block using the template {{unblock|your reason here}}. I also have this page on watch, and you will be able to edit this page while you are blocked provided that you do not misuse the privilege, so I will see comments you place on this page. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 17:17, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Urməvi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My account has been locked for more than a month. Please unblock, under my own responsibility no longer commit such violations.

Decline reason:

Time served isn't a valid unblock reason. If unblocked, we need to know what behaviour you will avoid, and what sort of editing you intend to do. It's not sufficient to say that you won't do it again - we need to know that you understand why you were blocked, and that you know what you need to do to avoid getting blocked again. Yunshui 雲‍水 10:34, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.