This article on a diploma mill, which was once upon a time long, accurate, and neutral, but unreferenced, was stubbed by you in October last year in response to an OTRS complaint. It was rebuilt into a very brief but referenced article. It is now being converted into an advertisement for the latest manifestation of the place, which is apparently "known for its academic excellence, and recognized, across the world, as one of the leading institutions of higher education in Pakistan." I intend to revert this biased garbage, and to oppose the introduction of any unreferenced information into the article.

This message is just a heads-up; I'm not asking you to do anything. I am telling you this because if another OTRS complaint comes in, I wouldn't like you to think that your actions in response to the first had been disregarded.

Hesperian 01:57, 3 October 2007 (UTC) [reply]

A template has been created that seems to have substantially changed the wording and the extent of the remedy you voted for at [[1]]. I am currently discussing this at [[2]] and I would welcome you input. I have posted this same message on the talk pages of the other 5 arbritrators who voted for remedy 2. Meowy 16:43, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]