Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 19:11, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Calvin harris songs, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Calvin harris songs has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Calvin harris songs, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 04:00, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. 156.34.220.210 22:51, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Y HALO THERE TITAN!

~Jeremy from drshnaps.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.122.6.54 (talk) 07:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC) GOOD WORK THAR —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.102.158.96 (talk) 08:32, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I MISS YOU BABY! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.122.6.54 (talk) 07:30, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

http://forums.drshnaps.com/chat.php? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.122.6.54 (talk) 07:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is weird. I've set my account to "remember me", but whenever I go on the Oasis page, it logs me out so I can't edit anything. Whe I go on another page, I'm logged in again. What is this and how do I prevent it? Titan50 (talk) 11:04, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Refresh your cache? Ctrl+F5 Scarian^{Call me Pat} 20:19, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing infobox genres, as you did on Fall Out Boy and Panic at the Disco. You changed them against consensus and did not source any. You may not just change information to your liking without even discussing it or adding citations. Please remember this in your editing from now on. Timmeh! 14:27, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Placebo (band), is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Several of your proposed genres have been contested in the past by knowledgeable editors; significant chances such as these to an article should first be discussed on the article's talk page in an attempt to reach consensus. Thank you. ^_^ Rachel Summers (talk) 19:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Westlife. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Lying from You‎, you will be blocked from editing. Cahk (talk) 21:01, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It might be a reasonable change since you would know the band better than I do. However, based on your pattern of editing and the fact you've vandalized other pages, I had to assume it is another vandals made by you. --Cahk (talk) 21:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's not 'vandalised pages in the past', you have vandalized another page less than 20 minutes ago, Westlife. You are welcome to change it back, but take this as a warning that if you keep vandalizing pages on Wiki, you will be blocked.--Cahk (talk) 21:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The main reason I reverted your edit was because the infomation is outdated. If you look at the blog part of the link you can see the last post (which talks about Ready Set Go and Scream) was posted 267 days ago, which is roughly nine months ago making the post from July 2007 which was a month before the release of RSG and nearly two months before the original date of Scream. But RSG didn't do to well when it was released and that pushed back the album date in the UK. That bebo site, however, hasn't been updated since. I have seen other Bebo/MySpace Tokio Hotel sites claiming to be official like this and that's why you can't know for sure if the official bebo is actually reliable(connected to the band) or just run by fans unless the band say it themselves what their official bebo is. I'm sure if it was official like their official MySpace and Buzznet accounts, it wouldn't seem completely abandoned like it looks currently. I have also seen a few "official" bebo and others claiming the album would be released in January 2008 in the UK but January came and went and the album goes unreleased(officially) in the UK. Although Scream is available to order through UK music sites like HMV and Amazon through import, the album has yet to get it's official release like the album has gotten in Canada and soon the US. Also their official website, even has the Scream (UK version) date set for "coming soon" in the 2008 releases section. And then if you look at their links section and click the link where is says "official bebo" you are brought to this which looks like it hasn't been created yet. So I hope that clears that up. Cheers AngelOfSadness talk 14:34, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you think Lostprophets is a nu metal band vote for it on the Talk:Lostprophets page. --Freedom (song) (talk) 18:25, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This wording of the lead to The Beatles has achieved consensus after lengthy debate on the talk page; if you think it needs changing, please start a fresh debate there. --Rodhullandemu 18:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC) This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.[reply]
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Authority Zero‎ and others]], you will be blocked from editing. --Rodhullandemu 18:53, 30 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as the one you made to Shyla Stylez.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Vinh1313 (talk) 19:34, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at Foo Fighters, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 19:50, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please make sure you understand what makes a reliable source according to policy. To quote "Articles should rely on reliable, third-party published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy". --neon white talk 04:02, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, such as the edit you made to Foo Fighters. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - eo (talk) 14:14, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you have a question that needs an answer, discuss it on the Talk Page instead of removing verifiable sources. - eo (talk) 14:33, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Category:Grey Daze ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. -- roundhouse0 (talk) 13:56, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I highly recommend you seek guidance on this as you seem to add many sources that are consider unreliable. Reading Wikipedia:Reliable sources would be a good start. The Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard can be used to check sources if you are unsure. --neon white talk 01:48, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for a period of 24 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 14:39, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Tim010987 (talk) 00:47, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't make changes like that. There is a strong consensus against having any other genres and commas are the norm; not line breaks. If you require any assistance please do not hesitate to contact me. Scarian^{Call me Pat!} 04:21, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you have changed or added genres on several Smashing Pumpkins pages. Please don't do this without providing a reliable source to back up your changes. Perhaps if you feel strongly about a certain change, bring it up on the talk page and it can be discussed. hbent (talk) 15:28, 23 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing the genres without discussing it first. Oli Filth^{(talk|contribs)} 15:51, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop changing genres based on your opinion. The genres listed in any given article are based upon the overall sources, not Wikipedia editors. (Ibaranoff24 (talk) 22:54, 30 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Please refrain from changing music genres without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Continued genre changes to suit your own point of view may result in a block. Thank you. Please be aware that sites such as rateyourmusic.com, which rely on user-submitted content, are not considered reliable sources. Please refrain from attempting to use such references to substantiate your own POV. Thank you. DKqwerty (talk) 12:21, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club Band. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Doniago (talk) 15:22, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Radiopathy •talk• 20:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've been warned repeatedly not to change the genres of music without discussing the matter. I see, however, that you have done so on Minutes to Midnight (album) and elsewhere. You need to get consensus for such a change before making it. Continuing to unilaterally change music genres could be viewed as disruptive, and - if it continues - You may be Blocked from editing. Thank you. UltraExactZZ ^Said ~ Did 20:01, 23 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Enth E Nd is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enth E Nd until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Calabe1992 16:19, 9 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]