Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:27, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the above article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 2 August 2022. Please check that the article needs no amendments. Feel free to amend the draft blurb, which can be found at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/August 2, 2022, or to make comments on other matters concerning the scheduling of this article at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/August 2022. I suggest that you watchlist Wikipedia:Main Page/Errors from the day before this appears on Main Page. Thanks and congratulations on your work. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:04, 10 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

TFA date changed to 16 August. Gog the Mild (talk) 12:03, 30 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In the image that you uploaded (File:Asymmetricwave2.png), you have the description "The 3D graph show the wavefunction for the 2-particle fermionic first excited state for the one dimensional infinite square well", whereas the image would seem to give (the real part of?) an amplitude function in a two-dimensional (square) box. What is correct? This appears to be causing confusion in its caption at Electron. —Quondum 20:14, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not to worry. I have managed to get the bottom of this, and have adjusted the caption at Electron for clarity. —Quondum 14:45, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting in visualization of good science in search of the deposited empirical data information set in physics, ["(File:Assymmetricwave2(dot)png)"], looks like an equilibrium at extremely infinitesimal distances;-

Thereby, the immense energies contained by huge quantity of force(s) to not *escape in velocities at those infinitesimal distances,- in the deposit of physics *defined information, nothing can be created nor destroyed, right? Is there frequency datum sets of charts, of infinitesimal, personal nomenclature( quantified quantity of substance(s), no pun, honestly intended), of relating to drawings such is, ["(File:Assymmetricwave2(dot)png)"], in order to better understand this drawing?

In regard to only a novice, I, Joschtony (Joseph, curator, surname Cimino), only have from college, even before, the science supplements to the circa 1970s, Encyclopedia Britannica, regarding quarks and quark theory.

In this regard, no one does someone else's research of fact checking, in thankful communication here a 'wiki' adding to this talking point of a drawing, I think requires expert physicist status, right?

thank you for your time, good today of days. just peace impartially needed. Joschtony (talk) 15:24, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Had there be use to correlate, just something I did a search engine fact checking,

that could be of interest,

here it is, kind of simplistic, but could be related to, (File:Asymmetricwave2.png) in that expert graduate physicist could find that as had been part of the deposited physic knowledge base, so only related to the drawing, ok?

In my, goodness sake personal communications, I like to end frequently by, just peace beyond the human condtion.

source of could be related article, related to my posted "the immense energies .. to *not escape velociites" by only novice input, however here is an expert simple physics article, at least to expert physicists, simplistic, *note, a presentation, not a 'chart' of frequencies, ie, the search engine, one phrae included "The spectrum of the radiation emitted by a hot body is continuous because there are many different kind of oscillators in any real lump of matter, so that in practice radiation exists at all frequencies."

yet, here is the source of that, not to add a drawing by mself to this "User_talk:TimothyRias" page on wiki, source link, https://www.miniphysics.com/electromagnetic-spectrum_25.html , in hopes that your, Timothy Rias, had this been received in your estimation of a novice contribution, of the posted (File:Asymmetricwave2.png) drawing, here on the wiki system.

Thank you for your time. Joschtony (talk) 15:56, 29 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please be informed,

thankfully your qualifications in physics far excels mine,

and thank you for your excellent contributions.

Re: a plausible theory of harmonics in quatum theory of the elements, of a dichotomy of harmonious equilibrium as opposed to disharmonious equilibrium, as sub-atomic particles exist in nature.

Its based on relating standard Newtonian physics to the extremely intensely high energies in velocities at extremely infinitesimal distances of the sub-atomic level. Sounds highly unlikely, I suppose, however, symmetry at the infinitesimal *distances over extremely short time frames* - need containment forces, thus this theory proposed in some of my files, has opposed forces of "centripetal" and by discreet particles qualities - non escapable velocities in "centrifugal" results of an *event horizon" of event horizons at the sub-atom elements and naturally occurring, ie H2 or He2 interactions of the protons and neutrons interacting with the energy levels of the electron shell event horizons, ie the pi electron shell, has zero probability to be at the nucleus,

"The sp3 hybrid orbitals, like the p orbitals of which they are partially composed, are oblong in shape, and have two lobes of opposite sign. Unlike the p orbitals, however, the two lobes are of very different size. The larger lobes of the sp3 hybrids are directed towards the four corners of a tetrahedron, meaning that the angle between any two orbitals is 109.5o." - source, ( 12.3: Hybridization of Atomic Orbitals - Chemistry LibreTexts of in another case observed in ammonia at 107.3 degrees.

Yes, atomic numbers & quantified quantities of infinitesimal substances of an atomic element can explain this, however, can't the *dynamics* in the natural state in nature have a needed harmonious state of being, including *not disharmonious static, however, can some "entanglement" at the sub-atomic level have *disharmonious static, - thereby, at the holistic elements forming molecules, there are healthy in life sciences interactions at the molecular level, and unhealthy interactions at the molecular level.

Isn't it a good proposal to experimental physics to form a project to quantify a theory of "fields" of forces, that have intrinsic healthy frequencies, as opposed in life sciences to unhealthy frequencies?

Thereby, can't these *vectored frequencies in substances times velocities be mapped to a harmonious music notes known today?

If you think this is idiotic, then I take your response at your word.

Besides, I'm not qualified to undertake such an immmense project to map out a, average, mean, mode, chi-squares, standard deviations, & other statistical design scientific graphed mapping, such are scatter grams and regression to progression, that could be done.

I suppose using Calculus, and by geometric trigonometric functions,

and other forms like matrix algebraic tallies, thus charted possibilities according to current understanding of physics at the elements level, and the sub atomic levels.

Thank you for your time, have a good today of days, in the human need of justly peaceful state of being.

P.S.

Finally, I have a wikiversity global user page, - however, the need of rules, it can not be cross referenced in this note to you.

Personally it is a learning curve to use 'wiki' - and I do have a scholarly background, again, please in that, I think 3.7 GPA of achieved 75 credits, - including A's in Calculus 1 & 2, a B in Physics 1, A in Managerial Statistics, - originally majored in Chem,

however, the chemical smells in the Chem lab had been too great an hardship for my studies to continue.

Other courses include top of the class in Sociology, and Prof Needleman then, an excellent instructor showed the first exam results, the grades had been skewed by the other students toward the grade of D, with very few in the A or B, due to my lifelong from childhood interest in humanities in history. Joschtony (talk) 10:40, 25 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TimothyRias! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:23, 11 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]