Hello TimBentley, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I've noticed that you've reverted a lot of vandalism and fixed several minor mistakes. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You can also create your own user page, which is the page that others see when they follow the link in your signature. Your user page is User:TimBentley. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  --TantalumTelluride 22:53, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please merge the Bhatti article to this one too. Also although some sources suggest that Maharja Ranjit Singh was of Bhatti origin, the local traditions consider him of different lineage.

خرم Khurram 14:41, 28 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of those South Pacific links you're changing to Pacific Ocean ought to go to South Pacific Area. —wwoods 20:10, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your tips, and help with those re-direction of my TJMU etc. Will consult you when I have question regard this. Take care! Dr. Slk 04:45, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

You've been pretty busy since I welcomed you to Wikipedia way back on November 6. According to Interiot's tool, you have contributed more than 3600 edits, including over 3300 in the main namespace. Thanks for your hard work and dedication to Wikipedia. Your contributions are greatly appreciated. --TantalumTelluride 04:55, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, hi there. I look at my watch page, and there you are going through all my west coast articles and there's the '"You Can Help" tag to your summary. I am a bit mystified by this, do you mean for disambigs in general? As it is I am even further mystified, as I am sure there was no disambig issue in the first place ?  :) Oh well, thanks for whatever you are up to.SatuSuro 07:20, 21 January 2006 (UTC) Another even more mystifying occurence is the two entries for mount sedgwick, I had asked for an afd for the incorrectly spelt one, and thought it had happened, but you find both.... oh well again SatuSuro 07:23, 21 January 2006 (UTC) Hey you're doing a great job! The Mt Sedge is my problem anyways, no sweat!SatuSuro 22:34, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for editing a page in my user space. Unfortunately the edit was actually wrong. The article was refereing to Syracuse the italian city and not the american town. On worries. I've tried to check other changes, in case same mistake made elsewhere. --Salix alba (talk) 10:17, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please de-merge the two articles, as both of the clans are totally different. Bhattis are from the Punjab province and Bhatis are the Rajputs of Jaiselmer.

Anirudh Singh Bhati

I am not aware how to make the demerger. I am new to wikipedia. Can you please send me the tags?

Anirudh Singh Bhati

Could you please cite Sir Denzil Ibbetson's work, that you have mentioned on Talk:Bhatti. Bhati/Bhatti are different clans altogether.[1]

Even this page [2] suggests that Bhattis were Punjabi Rajputs who conquered territories in Pakistan. Bhati Rajputs are originally from Jaiselmer and they are a Chandravanshi clan. Bhattis have their origin from the Bhati clan. Bhattis are generally those who have embraced islam.

Please read [3] also, on Jatland Wiki. (A similar message has been posted on Talk:Bhatti) --Andy123(talk) 19:56, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS:(Anirudh Singh Bhati/Anirudh is Andy123(talk))

Hi TimBentley, thanks for participating in my RfA discussion. Unfortunately, my fellow Wikipedians have decided at this time that I am not suitable to take on this additional responsibility, as the RfA failed with a result of 66/27/5 (71.0% support). If you voted in support of my request, thank you! If you decided to oppose me at this time, then I hope that if I do choose to reapply in the future, the effort I will make in the meantime to improve and expand my contributions to Wikipedia may persuade you to reconsider your position. All the best, Proto t c 10:31, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work with all the redirects and other Star Wars maintenance issues :) Deckiller 06:03, 22 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your corrections on the http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Critique_of_Finno-Ugric_and_Uralic_language_Groups&oldid=41492095 page. Adam88 19:48, 27 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In the said Flattbush article there is a misspelling in the Kerrang review where Philippines is spelled wrong. Guess who spelled it wrong? You guessed right, Filipinos...lol Stabinator 23:19, 21 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

	My RfA
	Thank you for supporting/opposing/commenting on my request of adminship, sadly the result was 54/20/7 an thus only 73% support votes, resulting in that the nomination failed. As many of you commenting that I have to few main-space edits, I'll try to better my self on that part. If you have any ideas on what kind of articles I could edit, pleas send me a line. :)	→AzaToth 09:46, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Tim, I disagree with your Stack (Computing) => call stack edit on the HP3000. Like the Burroughs the 3000 is almost a pure stack machine, it has one index register, otherwise all ALU instruction reference at least one argument implicitly from the stack. This is in contrast to a machine like the VAX or x86 where register based idioms are possible and even procedure call instructions like your call_stack reference can be avoided. Please revert. If you follow the links to hpmuseum.net to look at the machine instruction manual (PDF) you'll see what I mean. RDBrown 23:05, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TimBentley. Just a quick note to thank you for your support in my RfA, which recently passed 62/13/6. I will do my very best live up to this new responsibility and to serve the community, but please let me know if I make any mistakes or if you have any feedback at all on my actions. Finally, if there is anything that I can assist you with - please don't hesitate to ask. Cheers TigerShark 03:57, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimBentley! Thank you for your support in my recent successful request for adminship. If you ever have problems that you could use my assistance with or see me doing stupid things with my new buttons, don't hesitate to contact me. Happy editing, Kusma (討論) 02:24, 8 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing disambiguation.Velimir85

Template:Timeline of Russo-Turkish Wars has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. John Reid 10:29, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tim--can you take a look at the Tim Pat Coogan page. Certain Irish censors/apologists (Demiurge, Djegan) are deleting my edits claiming as boilerplate excuse their claim that I am a "sockpuppet". If you read my sourced and cited edit, you will see that this is blatant censorship. And maybe you'll wonder why not only is Demiurge censoring my edits to the wikipage, he is also deleting my notes on the Discussion Page.

Demiurge has a long history of attempted censorship and Catholic apologetics on Wikipedia, where NEITHER of those things belongs. He has gotten away with it because he is backed up by his fellow Irish Wikipedians. He only stops (as he did regarding the Ante Pavelic and pre-Code movies pages) when he is caught red-handed by other third-party Wikipedians.

One day (probably soon) he is going to want to be an administrator. Do you think a censor and Catholic apologist belongs on Wikipedia at all, much less as an administrator??

Just review his edits or his attempted edits, particularly regarding the following pages:

• Eamon de Valera
• pre-Code (re ironically movie censorship in the USA by the Catholic church)
• Ante Pavelic
• Tim Pat Coogan
• List of Catholic American actors (or whatever they call it these days)

70.19.67.28 23:57, 19 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dear TimBentley,

Thanks for voting on my RFA! I appreciate your faith in me, and was overwhelmed by the positive response to my RFA; for it shows that at least I'm doing something right. :) I've started working to improve myself already, and I hope that next time, things run better, and maybe, just maybe, one day we can bask on the shores of Admintopia together. Thanks and cheers, _-M o P-_ 21:53, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your work on my articles. :) Kedi the tramp (talk • contribs • count) (repond to me on my Talk.) 18:31, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up in and around the 4x article. I did a lot of work on the categorical stuff. I prefer to work anonymously, to mask my wide variety of interests and keep them seperate. But wanted to step out to thank you with the nitty gritty. (~ Anonymous)

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar For what seems to be your neverending efforts to disambiguate pages. Keep it up! :) —Khoikhoi 03:14, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I commend you for completing unfinished RFD nominations. There seems to be only a few of us that do it regularly so they sometimes fall through the cracks for awhile. When you run into a bunch of them by the same person (like most of the ones you added today), you may want to consider pushing back on that person to do it. Here's an example of what I've done in the past. This ensures the person adding the RFD tag learns to do it right. I don't mind correcting a few, but when it's a bunch, I tend to think they should clean up after themselves. Anyhow, good job either way! -- JLaTondre 22:19, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, someone had told them, but they didn't do anything about it. TimBentley (talk) 22:41, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, I would have reverted the nominations that I didn't agree should be deleted with an edit summary of something like "incomplete nomination which nominator has not completed despite request". A nomination is only valid if listed and if they don't want to take the time to list it then there is no need for the rest of us to take the time to process it. But that's only my opinion and if you don't mind listing them, there is nothing wrong with that. Thanks! -- JLaTondre 11:49, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for participating in my RFA, which closed successfully today with a result of (62/18/3). I will go very carefully at first, trying to make sure I don't mess up too badly using the tools, and will begin by re-reading all the high-quality feedback I received during the process, not least from those who opposed me. Any further advice/guidance will be gratefully accepted. I hope I will live up to your trust! Guinnog 14:33, 30 August 2006 (UTC)}[reply]

Hey!! There are alot of supermodel stubs here at wikipedia. The only non stubs seem to be the VS Angels. I was wondering if you could please help add more/edit articles of supermodels such as Doutzen Kroes, Jessica Stam, Gemma Ward, and Bianca Balti. Thanks. Lil Flip246 16:32, 31 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

thanks... even though i've been on here for about 3 years, i still have problems figuring out computer code. Kennethtennyson 20:03, 7 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim,

I'm really hoping the link checking can be automated, so you won't have to update it. The two main goals of the page, as I see it, are:

1. A quick-look page for people who already have adopted pages, so they can see the (automated)link count update.
2. A place where pages can be listed for adoption so people can come claim some.

Thanks! --Ling.Nut 20:46, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason to delete the update? Michael 23:29, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you edited the link. Michael 23:47, 11 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That's okay. Michael 03:31, 12 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You beat me to reverting the vandalism on Orlando Bloom's page! haha -FateSmiled&DestinyLaughed 14:22, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help, Tim! Though I *do* read instructions from time to time, I obviously like the trial and error method best! Thank you for setting up the redirection for me. You may also want to do that for Anastasia M. Ashman who was facing a similar issue. Best, Jen

I thought something strange was there, thanks for solving it. —Argentino (talk/cont.) 21:17, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you changed a reference to British to Kingdom of Great Britain. The problem is that British, although marked as a "disambiguation page", is actually a small article that points one to other articles such as to British Isles (terminology) that are also on point. I think in this instance, it is better to leave the "disambiguation" link in place, and I have reverted accordingly. I am even considering removing the dab tag from the article itself. In the meantime, please consider removing the article from your list. Thanks. Robert A.West (Talk) 04:35, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gone :) Soo 18:06, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good job working on the list, thanks. Could you make sure you move them from "To do" to "Done" when you finish? TimBentley (talk) 18:43, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the compliment, but I'd honestly rather let a more experienced disambiguator make the call on whether an entry is done or not, at least for now. -- Gwern (contribs) 19:54, 23 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim,

Thanks for your help!

If what you say about CorHomo is correct, then I'm not surprised. It does what it does, and does it fairly well. Did you see my posting about putting links within comments on dab pages, so CorHomo would pick them up? This bug is actually a feature; it's useful.

About the 'shroom page: Dude, crash on the couch, raid the fridge, rearrange the furniture.

I just submitted an article to a linguistics journal. Cross your fingers for me! --Ling.Nut 04:54, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a form message being sent to all WikiProject Disambiguation participants. I recently left a proposed banner idea on the WikiProject Disambiguation talk page and I would appreciate any input you could provide. Before it can be approved or denied, I would prefer a lot of feedback from multiple participants in the project. So if you have the time please join in the discussion to help improve the WikiProject. Keep up the good work in link repair and thanks for your time. Nehrams2020 21:44, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I thought I forgot something :) Thank you. CanbekEsen 11:11, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you delete the page? It wasn't listed for deletion ... I was trying to move it to Camp Tuckahoe. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/delete&page=York-Adams_Area_Council

--evrik 03:15, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• I think it is getting sorted out. Now if I could get Camp Tuckahoe deleted so that York-Adams Area Council can be moved inot its place. Thanks for your help. --evrik 09:06, 20 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For kicking 'shroom butt. Ling.Nut 06:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tim - first off, thanks for fixing the Ottoman Empire link. I didn't catch that one...nor did I think anyone actually read that article :)

I was wondering if, you have any time, you could work on the disambiguation for the Battle of Saint Gotthard. For some reason, when you search "Battle of St. Gotthard" nothing comes up. I'd like "Battle of Saint Gotthard", "Battle of St. Gotthard" and "Battle of Szentgotthard" to all go directly to my page. I'd do it myself but I don't know the first thing about disambiguation. If you don't have time though, don't worry about it. Thanks.

FightingFalcon 00:45, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the redirect page Tim. I appreciate it.

FightingFalcon 01:04, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've now changed all the (instrument)-(level) templates to the correct -ist name from the nomination, and created all the new categories. So please implement this coding change right away, and we'll see what moves and what doesn't.--Mike Selinker 20:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim,

Your thoughts would be appreciated here. You're the man. :-)

Later --Ling.Nut 20:57, 30 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tim. It is Barry Miles. I forgot to disambig. Thanks for the note. -- Szvest 11:28, 31 October 2006 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up ®}[reply]

FYI, your recent edit to fix a problem accidently removed several warnings to the user. --ArmadilloFromHell 05:18, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Could you change Category:AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD to Category:Wikipedians in the AWWDMBJAWGCAWAIFDSPBATDMTD? TimBentley (talk) 20:52, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks for the note. -- Szvest 13:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up ®}[reply]

Since it has been decided that the redirect should be kept, should someone remove the tag? I'm not sure I'm allowed to, since I was the one who put the tag up. -WarthogDemon 01:23, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. 2 things: if you edit my user page, please keep it down to as few edits as possible. Use the preview button. Also, please link to the relevant discussion. You say "per CFDU", however I cannot find the relevant discussion there. Thanks and happy editing! --Storkk 14:20, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the tip with Jenny Morris (singer). I've made several recently actually. I'll through and blank them instead of keeping needless rfd tags on 'em. Thanks again. -WarthogDemon 05:49, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am attempting to generate traffic to the WP Chicago page. Is there a precedent on whether and how Wikipedia:WikiProject Cities can solicit participation on City pages? Please reply at my talk page. TonyTheTiger 20:40, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I posted queries at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Cities and Wikipedia:Village_pump. TonyTheTiger 22:24, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TimBentley, thank you for your support in my RfA which passed on 13th December 2006 with a tally of 49/10/5. I am delighted by the result and a little daunted by the scope of the additional tools; I shall be cautious in my use of them. I am well aware that becoming an Admin is not just about a successful nomination, but a continuing process of gaining further experience; for this I shall welcome your feedback. Again, many thanks for supporting my RfA, feel free to contact me if you need any assistance. :-) David Ruben 01:29, 17 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I had hoped for some feedback here. TonyTheTiger 21:45, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Because of your edit history, I thought you might be interested in contributing to this deletion discussion. Thanks. Mermaid from the Baltic Sea 03:36, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Menemen massacre, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Menemen massacre. Thank you. Xenovatis (talk) 13:37, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is what is happening here what I think is happening here? 198.163.53.11 (talk) 20:53, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's IP canvassing spam from a City of Winnipeg network. Make what you will of that. . dave souza, talk 12:50, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Orange list (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Cnilep (talk) 21:18, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your interests in the history of the Middle East. But the "Seljuk Empire" ("Great Seljuq Empire" (current title in English Wikipedia) continued between 1038 – 1157. All of rulers of the Seljuk Empire, the Seljuk Sultanate of Rum, Seljuks of Kerman, Seljuks of Syria etc were Seljuk Turks. See you. Takabeg (talk) 04:14, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Tim. When you create new disambiguation pages, like Ainapur and Akkur, please remember to WP:FIXDABLINKS by checking Special:Whatlinkshere after you create the pages. Especially check for templates and redirects, which usually account for most of the links. Thanks. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 12:23, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, those were probably redirect pages when they were deleted. I'll get to work on the other 27 or so too. TimBentley (talk) 14:02, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Aziza (African mythology), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Smoking pipe (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This edit is actually wrong. There are two different Kalev's (one is just Tallinna Kalev), and it isn't logical that there's a team in a league twice. Pelmeen10 (talk) 13:40, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Disambiguator's Barnstar
		The Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who are prolific disambiguators. For helping keep the 'pedia in tiptop shape. Cheers! —Eustress talk 19:03, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing disambiguation on the HIV prevention article. Blue Rasberry (talk) 23:27, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi TimBentley,

I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We have created a tool, called wikiFeed, that allows you to specify Twitter and/or RSS feeds from news sources that are interesting to you. wikiFeed then helps you make connections between those feeds and Wikipedia articles. We believe that using this tool may be a lot of fun, and may help you come up with some ideas on how to contribute to Wikipedia in ways that interest you. Please participate! To do so, complete this survey and follow this link to our website. Once you're there, click the "create an account" link to get started.

For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at wikifeedcc@gmail.com. We appreciate your time and hope you enjoy playing with wikiFeed!

Thanks! RachulAdmas (talk) 20:10, 24 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the November 2013 monthly disambiguation contest, on Saturday, November 23 (UTC). I will personally give a $20 Amazon.com gift card to the disambiguator who fixes the most links on that server-day (see the project page for details on scoring points). Since we are not geared up to do an automated count for that day, at 00:00, 23 November 2013 (UTC) (which is 7:00 PM on November 22, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the project page leaderboard. I will presume that anyone who is not already listed on the leaderboard has precisely nine edits. At 01:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC) (8:00 PM on November 23, EST), I'll take a screenshot of the leaderboard at that time (the extra hour is to give the board time to update), and I will determine from that who our winner is. I will credit links fixed by turning a WP:DABCONCEPT page into an article, but you'll have to let me know me that you did so. Here's to a fun contest. Note that according to the Daily Disambig, we currently have under 256,000 disambiguation links to be fixed. If everyone in the disambiguation link fixers category were to fix 500 links, we would have them all done - so aim high! Cheers! bd2412 T 02:06, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Dharmapuri, Andhra Pradesh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vin09 (talk) 08:44, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimBentley. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimBentley. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I saw that you edited the article Black Mirror and thought maybe you would be interested in this new user category I created?-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 05:36, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TimBentley. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello TimBentley! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:23, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Paternity (Disambiguation) and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 August 24#Paternity (Disambiguation) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Steel1943 (talk) 16:39, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]