You have been blocked indefinitely for abusive sockpuppetry. During my CheckUser investigation, I determined that you created a number of throwaway accounts, made small articles with them, and then used this account to tag the article for deletion and/or report the user to AIV. This sort of disruptive behavior violates our sockpuppetry policy, and as such, is a blockable offense. Nishkid64 _{(Make articles, not wikidrama)} 21:14, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Moldavien. Since you had some involvement with the Moldavien redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. TheChampionMan1234 11:24, 7 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Turtle Wax is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Turtle Wax until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 00:08, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Moldavien. Since you had some involvement with the Moldavien redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 01:16, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Konstantin Sokolenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Konstantin Sokolenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 20:27, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sfazù requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. ZH8000 (talk) 12:34, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sfazù. Since you had some involvement with the Sfazù redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. ZH8000 (talk) 12:45, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Courts (village) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apparent hoax - I can't find any indication this place exists. GeoNET produces no results, nothing on Google Maps, nothing on any other wiki, no coordinates to check, and no results on a Google search. Obviously the name makes it difficult to search by, but still - usually you get some kind of trivial result, and here I've got nothing.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:17, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anatoliy Karpenko is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anatoliy Karpenko until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ravenswing 11:17, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Vitryssland and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 10#Vitryssland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:34, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]