Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100 101, 102, 103

This page has archives. Sections older than 20 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

Welcome to my talk page. to leave me a message .

Many thanks for your comment on the page I created. A secondary source that cites and reports about the conjecture is for instance the scholarly article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2321440121 According to Wikipedia "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (often abbreviated PNAS or PNAS USA) is a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary scientific journal. It is the official journal of the National Academy of Sciences, published since 1915, and publishes original research, scientific reviews, commentaries, and letters. According to Journal Citation Reports, the journal has a 2022 impact factor of 9.4. PNAS is the second most cited scientific journal, with more than 1.9 million cumulative citations from 2008 to 2018. " Wisdomagic (talk) 14:37, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Then please add it to the draft which curently displays a single primary source. Theroadislong (talk) 15:24, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and a happy new year! I wonder if anything else is required (I am not super familiar with Wiki procedures) Cheers Widsomagic Wisdomagic (talk) 16:33, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft Draft:The Balkans Continued Fraction is awaiting a review but as it has only two primary sources as references it is unlikely to be accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 16:38, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the feedback. I have revised the article to adopt a more neutral tone and removed subjective language. Additionally, I have reworked the "Impact" section to avoid unsupported claims and clarified the details provided with reliable sources. Please let me know if further improvements are needed. RSA-Axp (talk) 10:39, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine with those of course, I resubmitted (not being familiar with wiki procedure I don't know if there is anything else I should do). Wisdomagic (talk) 07:39, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear theroadislong, I wrote the draft: Alef (company) article as best as I could, in a more neutral language, and removed any text that might be in favor of the company. But there is a problem. When I was editing the article, I mistakenly deleted the comments and warnings from it. If possible, please forgive me and please put it on my page again. I'm really grateful. Manikingr (talk) 10:42, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher)@Manikingr: I've handled this. You could have looked in the edit history of the draft and selected a previous version to get the tags. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:35, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your attention, you are an exemplary editor Manikingr (talk) 14:55, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Women in Red | January 2025, Vol 11, Issue 1, Nos 324, 326, 327, 328, 329 Online events: New: Music (year-long initiative) | Alphabet run A & B | Internet personalities Continuing: #1day1woman (year-long initiative) | Women who died in 2024 Announcements from other communities Celebrate Wikipedia Day on Jan 15, 2025 Participate in #1Lib1Ref Jan 15 – Feb 5, 2025 Tip of the month: Celebrate WiR's 20% achievement by adding {{User:ForsythiaJo/20%Userbox}} to your user page. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 17:51, 28 December 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging[reply]

Album the album was rewritten. Can we change the page name to Kuini Album since we notice there is already a Kuini page. Sarahalohi (talk) 22:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• about the album

Sarahalohi (talk) 22:32, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That is possible when the draft is accepted but who is "we" user accounts are strictly single person use. Theroadislong (talk) 22:47, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Over 20 something independent third party reliable sources. Your bias opinion is not valid. Edward Myer (talk) 22:52, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok feel free to re-submit I will not review again. Theroadislong (talk) 23:15, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On an entirely different topic, it looks like we've upset someone. Someone who's now registered a new account and is going around vengefully PRODding articles you and I created. Any guesses? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:31, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks... I’m not too concerned I even sent Sparta Teapot Museum to WP:AFD myself once being so embarrassed by it! the result was keep Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sparta Teapot Museum. Theroadislong (talk) 08:54, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Heh! :) DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and now they are blocked as a sock of User:Edward Myer. Theroadislong (talk) 09:17, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Flabbergasted, I am. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:21, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Bob meade (talk) 16:45, 30 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

	Have a happy New Year filled with light!
	Hi Theroadislong, Best wishes that the new year brings peace, good health and happiness. Thank you for what you do for the encyclopedia and this community. I have learned so much from you over the years, and am grateful for this. Cheers! Image: New Year's Eve Foxfires at the Changing Tree, Oji, Utagawa Hiroshige, woodcut, 1857 Netherzone (talk) 15:29, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

—𝐏𝐞𝐫𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨𝐝𝐞𝐟𝐞𝐜𝐭𝐨(𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔) 04:41, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year to you too. Please can you specify what parts in the content make it sound like an advertisement? The details mentioned are not advertising 24/7DCT, but just mentioning what the company does and its achievements - what do you suggest I remove or edit? Can you give me the specific wordings so that I can understand better?

As for the resources, they are independent publications mentioning 24/7DCT, so I am a bit confused about your feedback. Kindly help me out here. DigitalCounseling (talk) 16:18, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

“just mentioning what the company does and its achievements” is pretty much the definition of advertising on Wikipedia. I declined your draft Draft:24/7 DCT because of this and the lack of evidence of passing WP:NORG. The ‘Playful Minds Therapy” and “services” section are entirely un sourced and promotional, do you have a conflict of interest by any chance? Theroadislong (talk) 16:25, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for removing the education part of Carlisle, Massachusetts, i was gonna remove to to bring back the old school page, although, the source is from the old carlisle public school page, i was planning to move it, but i changed my mind. happy new year! Theawezomefriend12 (talk) 19:50, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• GVovl (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Bhikitia ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, I think that It is a notable wiki, please, visit this wiki's two active editions. It is the first Bangladeshi open (user editable) wiki based encyclopedia. However, It is notable I think, please, accept Draft:Bhikitia. GVovl (talk) 11:11, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Resing (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Oston ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Thanks for your review and feedback.

Could you help me understand if any of the references meet all the criteria? For example, The Park Record is a long established newspaper with significant coverage of Oston.Resing (talk) 23:55, 5 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The Park Record is good, spotify.com, IMDb and interviews are NOT reliable sources, Oston needs to pass the criteria at WP:NSINGER. Theroadislong (talk) 08:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I believe the two articles from The Park Record meet criteria 1.

"Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable, not self-published, and are independent of the musician or ensemble itself" Resing (talk) 14:21, 6 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"just blatant advertising totally inappropriate." - I live in the town, and am not linked to the company so I am hardly advertising, what else is wrong with my article. I have added cites as needed. GreatYarmouthAnonymous (talk) 21:56, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Whether you are an artist looking to showcase your work, a local resident eager to participate, or a visitor seeking an enriching cultural experience, the Great Yarmouth Arts Festival promises a memorable and inspiring event" is clearly just advertising whoever you are. Theroadislong (talk) 22:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Wikieditorken (talk · contribs)
  • User:Wikieditorken/sandbox ( | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Dear Reviewer, I am new in Wiki.Just submit my first article and it was not accepted. I think I forgot to add the topic of the article. Would like to know how could I add it back. Thanks a lot, Ken

Wikieditorken (talk) 12:42, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I have moved it to here Draft:ChoyChoy. You need to explain what Choychoy is. Theroadislong (talk) 13:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Theroadislong

See you're very active here in afc, which is much appreciated. I hoped you might be able to please assist in review and/or approval for my first draft submission: Draft:Gerry Cardinale It's been two months waiting, I don't think it's being seen by any reviewers. Appreciate your help or any direction to another option. Thank you very much! Yachtahead (talk) 21:21, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There are no independent, reliable sources here and that is what we base articles on : Ok, but I have a ISNI number and another wikipedia page in french ? Isn't that enough ? Please help me to know what sources might be more reliable than another wikipedia page or ISNI number please ? Raoni86 (talk) 11:52, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia cannot be used as a source it is user edited so not reliable, having an ISNI number is irrelevant. See WP:RS. Theroadislong (talk) 11:55, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

What others sources as movies, tv, records, books can i provide ? Only thing i see is God himself ?!! Raoni86 (talk) 13:30, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

God is not a reliable source. Sources need to be published and independent with significant coverage of the topic, you have dived into Wikipedia and immediately attempted the most difficult task here, namely writing an article about someone you are related to. Theroadislong (talk) 13:37, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mildred_Peel this article you started tell me how it's source are more valid that the one i provided, if I pay a journalist to write "the most iconic belgian artist" will it be accepted lol ? Raoni86 (talk) 13:41, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Be very careful, about suggesting that you pay for an article, you are 100% likely to be targeted by scammer. If you think the article I wrote on Mildred Peel is not notable you are free to send it to WP:AFD. Theroadislong (talk) 13:51, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

	The Civility Barnstar
	Thank you for keeping things cool in the recent situation. qcne (talk) 20:38, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

so far there is only one article in wikipedia. would be great to see one in english too. what can i do? https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_de_P%C3%A1jaro thanks for help ren Ren Zec (talk) 20:43, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It is irreleavnt that they have an article on the French Wikipedia, they are two entirely separate projects with different notability requirements. Just find more reliable independent sources. Theroadislong (talk) 21:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, following your suggestions I've made some major edits to this article. Have I done enough now, or is there more I should look at? Thanks for your help Jjarchivist (talk) 11:15, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]