Currently blocked
TG-article has been blocked from Wikipedia without an expiry.

TG-article (talk page)

— Wikipedian ♂ —
Pronouns	he/him
Country	United States
Account statistics
Joined	November 19, 2024
Autoconfirmed	Yes
Extended confirmed	Yes

Hello, this is the talk page. Please make sure to follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Please remember to sign your post with ~~~~ at the end of your post. Thank you. ThisGuy (talk • contributions) 15:57, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked due to your continued disruptive editing, which at this point seems to be deliberate. You are ignoring everything everyone is saying to you, continuing edit wars, don't know how to use the definite article and continue with edits against the MOS and disruptive short description edits. I'm not sure if you don't understand what is being said to you, or if you're deliberately ignoring what is being said to you, but at this point it doesn't matter as you're wasting the time of other editors. If you continue this when you return from your block, the next block will be indefinite. And you still have to fix your signature.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Canterbury Tail talk 02:24, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The last time this user was blocked, the first thing they did was place a notice at the top of this talk page stating the length of their block. So they obviously understand how to use talk pages, but refuse to engage on it… pretty egregious case of refusing to communicate. Danners430 (talk) 03:19, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I've noticed that too. Adding to this, this has been a billionth time that someone has explained to this User about the problems regarding his signature. Instead of fixing it, he re-configures it using the same yellow color. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 03:27, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

It seems to me that they are very well aware of what's going judging from this edit done on the top of their talk page stating that they're currently blocked. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 13:21, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@TG-article I can’t state for certain, but I’m willing to guess that this will likely be your last chance. Communication is required - it’s not optional. You’re obviously ignoring discussions instead of engaging with them, and I’m willing to bet that will count against you when administrators review your block. You’re invited to join the discussion and respond. Danners430 (talk) 14:08, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

They know how to use talk pages, but don't. I indicated above that the next block will be indefinite if they continue their current editing pattern. The fact that it could be interpreted that they're taking the block as a badge of honour instead of trying to correct their behaviour and collaborate with the community is tempting me to change the block to indefinite now. Indefinite does not necessarily mean permanent, but I think the lack of respect for the community and general behaviour at this point is leaning towards requiring responses and assurances to the community and acknowledgement of their actions in order to re-obtain editing rights. There is no evidence they're interested in change, and I think we'll be back here in a week. Canterbury Tail talk 15:45, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I know this isn’t the venue, but I’d support this course of action - at least until they show willingness to engage. Danners430 (talk) 17:29, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail: I'm not sure whether I'm allowed to do this here and whether or not this is the right venue to discuss this but would you mind looking over at the account UDEXTG (talk · contribs)? The nature of their edits suspiciously resemble each other with the account appearing to be an alt-account now used to evade this block. Aviationwikiflight (talk) 15:14, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes you are permitted, and I think it's quite clearly a WP:DUCK sock. I'm blocking both accounts indefinitely. If you see any more, feel free to reach out to me. I have a strong feeling this isn't the first account of this user either. Canterbury Tail talk 15:18, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am still quite surprised that this User still hasn't replied to any one of us nor to other editors in other discussions before it being archived. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 23:15, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Now I have been indefinitely blocked. ThisGuy (talk • contributions) 23:23, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the world of user talk pages! You wouldn't have been blocked if you had engaged from the very beginning......... Danners430 (talk) 23:49, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Are you actually socking with User:UDEXTG? Because I can't quite believe that instead of discussing with us, you chose to run away and continue your disruptive edits with a sock account. Hacked (Talk|Contribs) 23:55, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]