I often take material from my web site and use it here on Wikipedia. http://www.swtpc.com/mholley

Here is the permission section from my web site.

I want this information to be available to all and you can make copies of any of the files for personal use. If you want to use a few images or pages for commercial use you may do so without additional permission. If you want to publish any of my original photos or material and need a written release, I can provide that.

SWTPC6800 00:50, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swtpc6800, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Karmafist 18:07, 26 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Awarded for diligent research which resulted in finding the reference that shows the JEDEC is cited as "an industry wide standard-setting organization". Fnagaton 19:45, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

	Nice job on "Miss Ima"!
	To all of the excellent editors who were part of the Karanacs-led collaboration to bring Ima Hogg to featured status, it was a pleasure working with you on such a fine article about a great lady. Thank you so much for your contribution to this fun collaboration. Best regards, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 03:31, 30 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. I'd like to thank you for documenting the details of the TIME public domain issues (due to failure to renew copyright). You did this here. I was wondering if it would be a good idea to actually do a separate template and category for this. I noticed one of the covers is manually in Category:Fair use TIME magazine covers. Maybe a new category structure of TIME magazine covers, split into the fair use and PD (non-renewed) ones would help? Do you have a list of all the cover images around? Carcharoth (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be a great idea to have a "magazine cover in public domain, not renewed" tag. This would be for all magazines, not just for Time. There would be a link to a central page that has evidence of the failure to renew. My Time magazine details would go there. (I think Newsweek has missed even more issues.) From correspondence with the current copyright holder, I have found the Ziff-Davis Publishing and Gernsback Publications did not renew copyrights as a mater of choice. Too much bother. I also found that a side effect the leveraged buyouts of the 1980s were the new owners forgot to renew out of print magazines. See Talk:Electronics Illustrated

You can find a list of Time magazine images I have tagged at the bottom of this page. User:Swtpc6800/Sandbox#Public_domain_issues

-- SWTPC6800 (talk) 20:01, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I don't have time to follow through now, and may not remember this in a few days. Could you remind me if I forget? Carcharoth (talk) 01:52, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 14 August, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article WRNY, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Brill! Victuallers (talk) 10:30, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 1 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Electrician and Mechanic, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 09:41, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think we're ready to go; I left a note at the article talk page. Anything else you think we should do before we nominate? Mike Christie (talk) 13:42, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi -- just wanted to see if you there was anything else you think we should fix before nominating Amazing at FAC. Last time I asked you found some improvements that were needed, so I don't want to nominate without checking in. Let me know and I'll do the nom. Mike Christie (talk) 10:23, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ready -- SWTPC6800 (talk) 02:23, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I'll go ahead and nominate. Mike Christie (talk) 02:34, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done. This is the page to watchlist. I will be working about 8-6 most weekdays EST, but will have this Friday largely free and will be otherwise available to respond to any points that come up. I think you said you hadn't done a FAC nom before -- please jump in and fix anything you see raised as an issue, but also feel free to ask me about the FA criteria if you're not sure an objection is accurate. I'm not infallible but I've done it a few times so I have a reasonably good feel for what works at FAC. Later -- Mike Christie (talk) 02:50, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Space Science Fiction Magazine was too short for FAC because it was only 922 words. You won't have that problem with Amazing Stories; the word count is 9754 words with over 100 citations. Someone will complain it is too long. -- SWTPC6800 (talk) 03:28, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, readable prose size is 43Kb, per Dr pda's script (a very handy tool, if you don't already have it). This recent article says the article is big, but nowhere near the top end. So if someone complains I think they'd have to do it on the grounds of excessive detail, not because it exceeds an FA limit. Mike Christie (talk) 11:51, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It makes a nice surprise to login and get a Barnstar. :) Fnagaton 01:07, 22 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I just found a note in Erik Leif Davin's Pioneers of Wonder that you might be interested in. Davin cites Moskowitz, "Amazing Encounter", part II, in Fantasy Review 89 for his information, but makes no reference to the 1978 AMZ article critiquing Moskowitz. Then he says Gernsback's creditors "received $1.08 for every dollar they were owed" and in a footnote adds "Actually, this represents the ratio of assets to disbursements at the time of the bankruptcy. Because of administration fees, creditors would have received slightly less, about 95 percent of their claims, according to an estimate published in the New York Times, April 3, 1929." I wonder if Davin has a separate source for the "ratio of assets to disbursements", or if this is also taken from Moskowitz. Mike Christie (talk) 23:46, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just wanted to say that I'm most impressed with your commentary there, in which your professional expertise is clear. Thanks. Tony (talk) 11:05, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Can you convert your Copyleft image according to Wikipedia recommandations for image upload? I tried converting the image to monochrome and the size dropped from 52KB to less than 7KB without any further optimizations as recommended in the instructions. 24.83.176.171 (talk) 09:16, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On April Fool's, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Radio Hat, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thank you for your contribution to April Fool's Day 2009! Royalbroil 22:22, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again for your scan of the cover. Do you have any idea who was the original editor and publisher? The early history of the magazine is not well represented on the page. I don't know anything about it and I didn't take time to hunt down the necessary sources. Binksternet (talk) 03:48, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I only have the one issue. I added the table of contents page. File:Audio Oct 1963 pg01.jpg In the next week or two, I will looks for more on-line sources. Feel free to edit my changes. If you Google the newspaper story titles you can get the on-line edition -- SWTPC6800 (talk) 04:49, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the pictures I added one to the Busicom article. Would you happen to have some pictures of the inside of the machine (like the CPU board ?) Thanks again. (Ezrdr (talk) 23:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC))[reply]

and great license. Thanks. emijrp (talk) 22:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

So while I was spending far too much time on Binary prefixes and far too little on paying work, I was thinking about computers that use decimal addressing, and I went to the IBM 1401 article. Hmm, I thought, that's a nice pic of the 1401's front panel.

Looking at the full sized picture, and the picture credits... a working 1401 front panel, taken with a modern digital camera in 2007. And it's credited to you!

Are you on the team that's restoring that IBM 1401 in the Si valley? If so, my hat (if I had one) is off to you, sir. The 1401 at my first college was my first assembly language machine. We had Autocoder (of course) and Fortran IV running from disk - we had three 1311's and the usual 1402 and 1403... no tape drives. What a grand design, and so accessible to teach to beginners. I wish I'd kept some of the work I'd done on it. (But if I had kept everything I've wished later I'd kept I'd need a storage unit larger than my living quarters. Sadly I did not predict that I'd one day be able to store millions of full boxes of punch cards on a hard drive that cost less than a week's groceries.) Jeh (talk) 09:28, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I only took a tour of the 1401 at the Computer History Museum and took a few photos. The oldest computer I have used was an IBM 360 for a FORTRAN class in 1975. We had to submit our programs on punch cards. -- SWTPC6800 (talk) 05:42, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah... great picture anyway, even the glows of all the lamps came through well. Thanks again. Jeh (talk) 09:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I read with interest the "The IEC note was added to JESD100B by Fred Mann..." paragraph. Please, just write a book containing all your gems like this and get it published. It seems like you have a large historical database stored in your brain. :) Fnagaton 09:41, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The grammar problems in the Ed Roberts (computer engineer) article were rather minor, more in the nature of typos; I've seen far worse in Wikipedia. Some passages I've encountered were virtually unintelligible, requiring complete rewrites or outright deletion.
Since you obviously checked my user page, you saw that I speak three languages. Grammar and syntax are different in all of them. Perhaps that has made me more mindful of grammar and helped hone my skills in this area.—Quicksilver^{T @} 19:32, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could You please tell me how to find out the number of views any given Wikipedia site has? Thanks. Kdammers (talk) 02:04, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the desired page then select the history tab. At the top of the page you will see an External tools line. Press Page view statistics -- SWTPC6800 (talk) 02:19, 11 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External tools: Revision history statistics · Revision history search · Number of watchers · Page view statistics

I've given this a B rating from the Computing project, and I suggest you put it forward for GA review, it looks good from my brief look. The only weakness is that the lead could do with being 3 paragraphs. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 19:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 13:52, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Editor's Barnstar
		Congratulations for getting Micro Instrumentation and Telemetry Systems to GA status :) -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 22:05, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Swtpc6800, your username came up due to an edit you did to an article on my watchlist and "Swtpc6800" looked familiar, but I couldn't remember why, so I looked you up (on your user page). Having done so, I know the answer: the South West Technical Products Co 6800!! I used one at work (but did not built it myself) possibly as far back as 1979 (or there abouts), soon upgraded with a pair of Shugart (? spelling) 8" floppy drives; and later found use as an "interface" between an HP-IB instrument and a teletype (110 baud serial interface I/O terminal). It was eventually replaced with a Hewlett Packard HP-85 which had a built in HP-IB interface and used Basic language. Thanks for bringing back some happy memories. Pyrotec (talk) 21:06, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Five and One Hundred Dollar Confederate notes. Very nice scan. Jujutacular ^talk 17:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

An image created by you has been promoted to featured picture status Your image, File:Confederate 5 and 100 Dollars.jpg, was nominated on Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates, gained a consensus of support, and has been promoted. If you would like to nominate an image, please do so at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates. Thank you for your contribution! Makeemlighter (talk) 00:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for all the contributions to the classic computing articles I use. Nokorola (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Hands On Electronics Cover Nov 1988.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:26, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michael,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:Confederate 5 and 100 Dollars.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on December 26, 2012. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2012-12-26. —howcheng {chat} 19:51, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I miss those days! Hand assembling thousands of lines of 6800 and 6809 code. One I thought you might be interested in. I built an interface card for the SS-30 bus following the Electronic Industrial Engineer's design ideas as a high-speed bi-directional interface. After some design problems and a few wiring errors I had it working. Ready for it?

An E.I.E. I/O card! ;-)

Just wanted to say "Hi". All the best! 174.118.142.187 (talk) 04:36, 25 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Michael,

Just to let you know that the Featured Picture File:US Postal Currency 5 cent 1862 1863.jpg is due to make an appearance as Picture of the Day on June 17, 2013. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2013-06-17. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:52, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Lost Moon.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Technical Systems Consultants may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• '''Technical Systems Consultants''' (TSC) was a [[United States]] [[software company<ref name = "PS Feb 1978">{{cite journal | last = Hawkens | first = William| title =

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:42, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Very well put [1]. EEng (talk) 16:19, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swtpc6800. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:11, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Indian Space Shuttle Programme. Requesting you to add your opinion. Regards Thanks. M.srihari (talk) 07:29, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Srihari[reply]

There is an RfC that you may be interested in at Template talk:Infobox country#RfC: Religion in infoboxes of nations. Please join us and help us to determine consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 14:27, 17 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You recently mentioned something about undue weight of something related to the JEDEC standards in an article? Where is it? It sounds like it needs fixing. Fnagaton 23:01, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is an RfC at Template talk:Infobox#RfC: Religion in infoboxes concerning what should be allowed in the religion entry in infoboxes. Please join the discussion and help us to arrive at a consensus on this issue. --Guy Macon (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swtpc6800. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that an attempt is being made to overturn an RfC that you voted on (2 RfCs, actually, one less than six months ago and another a year ago). The new RfC is at:

Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#RfC: Allow private schools to be characterized as non-affiliated as well as religious, in infobox?

Specifically, it asks that "religion = none" be allowed in the infobox.

The first RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

• 15 June 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion infobox entries for individuals that have no religion.

The result of that RfC was "unambiguously in favour of omitting the parameter altogether for 'none' " and despite the RfC title, additionally found that "There's no obvious reason why this would not apply to historical or fictional characters, institutions etc.", and that nonreligions listed in the religion entry should be removed when found "in any article".

The second RfC that this new RfC is trying to overturn is:

• 31 December 2015 RfC: RfC: Religion in infoboxes.

The result of that RfC was that the "in all Wikipedia articles, without exception, nonreligions should not be listed in the Religion= parameter of the infobox.".

Note: I am informing everyone who commented on the above RfCs, whether they supported or opposed the final consensus. --Guy Macon (talk) 03:17, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Swtpc6800. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is to let you know that the Amazing Stories article has been scheduled as today's featured article for October 13, 2018. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 13, 2018, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:36, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Michael, thanks for uploading your 1981 photo of a Nascom computer.

You describe this as a Nascom 2, please have a read of the Nascom history: https://nascom.wordpress.com/history/ In early 1981 Nascom company collapsed and Lucas Nascom was formed in August. The computer in your photo has a Lucas badge, and was later called the Nascom 3. Please can you update your description of the photo if you agree?

Also in the photo the sign on top of the computer says 'Produit agree' - this is French for 'Approved Product', so are you sure the photo was taken in London? John a s (talk) 12:33, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]