Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

I will stop vandalizing, thanks for the warning anyways; that mean the administrators of Wikipedia.en are doing well.Z̬̊̊ͬ̌̅́ͅa̬̜͇͉̤̱̫̪͓ͫ̑͂̾́͋ľ͖̳͙̆ͫ̍͛̓ͩ̚g̯̯̥̗͙͈͙̹͓͋̓̃ͣ̄ͣo͍̥ͥͧ͒ͪ͛̂ͤ͑ --88.24.12.200 (talk) 09:49, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Svick!
Can you help me again xD. The bs.wiki is using -moz-border-radius in the top-menu (user page, discussion etc) and in the left menu ( main page, contents etc etc.) and in some more places, if you use firefox you will probably se it. I want to remove the moz-border-radius code, where can I find the css-file in mediawiki. --DzWiki (talk) 12:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

The code is in bs:MediaWiki:Monobook.css. Svick (talk) 15:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Svic - User:Trev_M/ThumbTid now running nicely - always simple when you know how. I picked the template up from someone who had given up on it six months ago, probably because of the issue you showed me how to fix. Ah... collaboration. Nice to see Czech representation here, too. Trev M (talk) 23:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of numerical analysis software, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of numerical analysis software. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Jwesley₇₈ 21:23, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for this fix- both the typos and the unknown syntax ("archiveurl"). tedder (talk) 18:36, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi Svick

We usually have reaction schemes on a line of its own, indented. The vast majority of reaction schemes tend to be long, and having it as a thumbnail is not usually helpful. For this particular instance, I find the output much more difficult to read. I've restored the previous version for now. --Rifleman 82 (talk) 02:13, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the ref fix--EnigmaMcmxc (talk) 22:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your message. It should not happen... but if it does than there is a bug. I will investigate the problem. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 17:37, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Followup: fixed on the same day, 2 articles affected. Thanks. -- Basilicofresco (msg) 13:28, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for helping out w/ WinDirStat article. Bondrake (talk) 20:00, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Also, if you don't mind, would you weigh in on the AfD? Bondrake (talk) 19:05, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, I should've done that before. Thanks for reminding me. Svick (talk) 19:29, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey there Svick, thank you for your contributions! I am a bot alerting you that Non-free files are not allowed in the user or talk-space. I removed some files that I found on User:Svick/Portal images. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

The deleted Template:Maine portal was invoked by reference page Wikipedia:List of U.S. state portals. Yours aye, Buaidh (talk) 16:34, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

FYI, I removed the thread you commented on as all three accounts have been blocked. The thread wasn't worth keeping on the talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:42, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Hey, a couple or few edits by you of NRHP list-articles, many but far from all of which are on my watchlist, are lighting up on my watchlist. Are you just visiting NRHP lists to insert the nbsp character? That seems unhelpful. There is no bad line-breaking happening in any of these articles' tables. If it's just that, please stop. --doncram (talk) 15:25, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm just going through my past contributions and cleaning them up using AWB. And I edited redirects to those three NRHP articles recently (AWB automatically resolved the redirects). I think that adding the  s doesn't break anything and is slightly helpful – just because you don't see any bad line breaks doesn't mean people with other resolutions or browser window sizes won't. And while I see a reason for telling me “please stop” if I was going through many of those articles (it clutters page histories and watchlists), I don't understand why would you undo my edit. Svick (talk) 16:01, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Okay, glad you understand about the issue of cluttering page histories and watchlists. In addition to those concerns, I happen to see adding nbsp's as slightly unhelpful: they add unnecessarily to page-size, which is a concern on many NRHP list-articles. The tables have been viewer-tested for a couple years now. If it's just 3 out of the thousands of NRHP list-articles, then it doesn't matter either way. Maybe it's just random that 2 were on my watchlist, and I feared u were starting on more. Thanks! All done here. --doncram (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Could you reply to what I said at my talk page? Codedon (talk) 21:12, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much for your help with Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force/ILDS-ICD! ---kilbad (talk) 17:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I fixed only one mistake, everything (including the one mistake) was done by User:Jarry1250, not me. You should be thanking to him. Svick (talk) 17:40, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

It's a big file, sometimes it is tough to find things in the preview.Naraht (talk) 16:05, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank You Very Much for fixing the Dalowali page. I am sorry, I am new to wikipedia and don't know much; actually I should say I am not really a computer person. Your help has been greatly appreciated. Thank You Very Much once again.

Haroon Sarwer —Preceding unsigned comment added by Haroon Sarwer (talk • contribs) 00:53, 8 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you very, very much for making a Template for a Random Page in a Category on Wikia. You have no idea how much this will help me ^_^ 24.41.59.83 (talk) 00:44, 11 April 2010 (UTC) (The same person who asked for the template on the discussion page)

Can you please leave it like that? I need the article to be in spanish for 3 weeks.. after that it can go back to spanish. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wiki032990 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

No, I really can't. That article isn't just for you, but for everyone who wants to read about that image in English. I don't know why you need it in Spanish, but you can either use the same article on the Spanish Wikipedia, use permanent link to your translated version, or copy the article to your userspace. Svick (talk) 18:07, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

I'm puzzled by the intervening edits - some seem to be a genuine attempt to add content, but others just seem odd. I'm not sure it was an actual vandal - maybe someone trying to do something but over their head. In any event,looks like reverting to an earlier version was the bestsolution.SPhilbrickT 17:37, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I looked at this diff and didn't see anything constructive, so I reverted it. Svick (talk) 17:42, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Dear Svick,

It looks as you have done the last edits on William Channing Woodbridge. If it is not you I should be writing to please let me know. The footnote 5 which is now missing should be a reference to the 1993 Walters article, page 44. This publication is listed above near the top of the references. I will not make the edit myself, as I do not understand how the linking system works. I would appreciate it if you or someone else could make the needed change.

If there is another thing that needs work, please let me know.

Thanks for your work.

Bill

Elkmilok (talk) 23:52, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. Svick (talk) 01:24, 16 April 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for welcoming me.ya.My edits did not work. Though i am primarily registered with this wikipedia, i am basically working on mr.wikipedia since last about 10 months. I wanted to correct the KiloVolts term which is written actually as Kg volts in the article.anyway, thanks again for welcoming.

--alpamati 06:37, 16 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by V.narsikar (talk • contribs)

Hi there. You have been systematically unlinking the series title in infoboxes for Buffy the Vampire Slayer episodes (most recently here), with only "cleanup" as the explanation. However, the documentation for {{Infobox television episode}} clearly recommends that the series title be linked, which also seems to be the near-universal practice for other series, including in featured articles like Pilot (House) or Subway (Homicide: Life on the Street). Could you please either undo (the unlinking part of) your changes, or point to a discussion showing that consensus about recommended infobox usage has recently changed? Thanks, Hqb (talk) 06:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't see the documentation clearly recommending it, but the example shows the show's name linked. The reason I did it was so that Template:Television colour would work (it changes the background color of headings). I guess the best way is to add new parameter Series link to {{Infobox television episode}}, so that it can both use Template:Television colour and link to the article. And document the connection to Template:Television colour (which I'm going to do right away). Do you agree? Svick (talk) 12:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't think of the auto-coloring at all; thanks for fixing the docs. Looks like several other series' episode boxes are broken in the same way; for example, The X Files has a designated color, but episode infoboxes like The X-Files (pilot episode) don't use it. A "Series link" parameter sounds workable, if perhaps a little inelegant, and would require updating thousands of articles. A possibly less disruptive alternative would be to list both linked and unlinked variants of the series title in {{Television colour}}, much like it's already done in {{Taxobox colour}}. Maybe this whole issue merits more discussion at Template talk:Infobox television episode? Hqb (talk) 20:21, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

I guess you're right. Even thought there is one small detail I don't like about it – you can write a link in a variety of ways, e.g. [[Buffy the Vampire Slayer (TV series)|Buffy the Vampire Slayer]] or [[ Buffy the Vampire Slayer (TV series) | Buffy the Vampire Slayer ]] (notice spaces) and they are different from {{#switch}}'s point of view. I'm going to request the change to Template:Television colour probably tomorrow and then change the Buffy episode articles back. Svick (talk) 21:08, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Looks like it's working; great job, thanks! Hqb (talk) 06:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Next time you do something like this, could you do me a favor? Space the changes by an hour or so. That way my automatic march through my watchlist won't be so monotonous. ;) —Tamfang (talk) 17:52, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

I need help translating an important text of 107 words to Czech. Any chance you could help? If so, would I be able to reach you through IM, IRC or Email? TheCuriousGnome (talk) 07:18, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

You can send me an e-mail. Svick (talk) 14:56, 25 April 2010 (UTC)

It was quite urgent and I eventually managed to find someone from the Czech Republic earlier today whom helped me out. Thanks for offering help. TheCuriousGnome (talk)

What's up with User:NoNewsToday? Why is there a duplicated user page of yours? Nageh (talk) 11:08, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't know who he is and yes, his user page is a copy of an old version of my user page. I'm going to contact him and ask him to change it. Thanks for noticing it. Svick (talk) 15:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

I'll speedy delete it. It makes it look like he/she is trying to impersonate you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:09, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

What's the matter with that guy? I suggest you take another look on "his" user page, and give him a final warning for impersonation. Nageh (talk) 21:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Hahaha... erm, take a look here. Nageh (talk) 21:49, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

PS: Of course, you may have given permission, after all he didn't copy your barnstars. Nageh (talk) 21:52, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for noticing again. Svick (talk) 22:44, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

You should add a tracking category with some obfuscation that wouldn't be noticed by the casual pirate. :) There may be grounds for a sock report if the behaviour is similar. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 22:53, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

You sure do help a lot of people! Thanks for adding the </ref> tags I (somehow) forgot! You would think I would notice the big bold red text in there! VerballyInsane 01:49, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Svick, thanks for the update to Category:Canadian Music Hall of Fame. I've been doing a lot of maintenance on the Canadian music categories. I've asked for help, but...

• Wikipedia_talk:Categorization#Content of category pages/format
• Wikipedia_talk:Categorization#Content of category pages/portal links?

Argolin (talk) 22:08, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Diligence
		For working endlessly to improve the 'pedia. Cheers! —Eustress talk 14:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Love your work, especially on templates! —Eustress ^talk 14:17, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

I reverted Template:Scotland portal to oldid=357247668 to restore resizing and left justification functionality and to maintain compatibility with Template:England portal, Template:Wales portal, and Template:Northern Ireland portal. Yours aye, Buaidh (talk) 13:46, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Do you have any examples where is that functionality actually used and useful? And what do you mean by compatibility? Svick (talk) 16:10, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

These templates are part of a series that features standard box height with resizing and left justification options. Please see Wikipedia:List of U.S. state portals. Yours aye, Buaidh (talk) 18:01, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

I replied on the village pump, and sent you an e-mail. ---kilbad (talk) 22:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)

I sent you another e-mail. Also, perhaps on the top of the following page you could put a small, well written description of how you generated that data?:: Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force/Articles created. Thank you so much for your help! ---kilbad (talk) 00:19, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi Svick. I was wondering if you could help me to form the following two lists:

• Pages that transclude {{for}} more than once.
• Pages that transclude {{About}} more than once.
• Page that transclude {{Redirect}} more than once.

-- Magioladitis (talk) 11:20, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Sure, do you mean with or without their redirects? Svick (talk) 13:38, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

With would be better. -- Magioladitis (talk) 18:06, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Here you go: for.txt, about.txt and redirect.txt. The dump is from 12 March, so it's quite outdated (there isn't any newer dump). Svick (talk) 22:24, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Cheers! -- Magioladitis (talk) 07:40, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your speedy assistance this evening! Basket of Puppies 03:14, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi,
do you still get the error you noted in WT:Twinkle/Bugs#351, or was that a temporary fluke? I was never able to reproduce it, and even with the changed default skin nobody else seems to have that problem. I'd just blame the Usability Initiative. :)
Cheers, Amalthea 17:12, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm unable to enable the navigable TOC regardless of Twinkle now, so I think you can mark it as resolved for now. If I have more information, I'll file it again. Thanks for the effort. Svick (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Ah, navigable TOC “hasn't launched yet”, which seems to mean that it was disabled for now. Svick (talk) 17:38, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Small wonder I got no complaints. :)
It's been disabled on http://usability.wikimedia.org as well so I can't investigate it at the moment. I'll try to stay on top of it.
Thanks, Amalthea 18:21, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Would it be possible to have the following data automatically regenerated/updated on a monthly basis?:: Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force/Articles created ---kilbad (talk) 16:15, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I think it would. Should I update the list of unassessed redirects every month too? Svick (talk) 22:50, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Do you mind adding an intro to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine/Dermatology task force/Articles created page discussing how the data is generated, and how often it is updated? Thanks again SO much for your help with all this!! ---kilbad (talk) 02:21, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

Can you help with the pubmed bot? I think it might be broken? Basket of Puppies 16:49, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Hi, yeah, it seems it's broken. I notified the author of the bot and fixed the article. Svick (talk) 17:18, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for the late reply. I've implemented the change, can you try now? And are you sure this isn't going to break the Firefox users? –xeno^talk 17:35, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

It works now for me now both in IE and Firefox. Thanks. Svick (talk) 19:11, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the fix, and testing it. –xeno^talk 19:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

te.wikipedia.org is using old ad template which does not seem to cycle through more than 2 ads. Can you help port the latest template/guide me? example location of ad on my telugu talk page te:వాడుకరి:/Arjunaraoc
Arjunaraoc (talk) 08:27, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

It seems to be working to me. The template uses total number of edits on a wiki to determine which ad to show. This way, what ad is shown is quite random on a wiki as large as English Wikipedia, but it seems Telugu Wikipedia isn't edited often enough. This means that the “show another” link may not work, if it is used too often (i.e. when no edit was made since the last time it was used), but other than that, it should work fine. Svick (talk) 22:56, 30 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the clarification. How about making the next ad display based on the time rather than edit count, so that it can be used across wikiprojects. Arjunaraoc (talk) 05:06, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Please help to fix the wiki advertisements navigation display. I have removed the old page to display the list of images assuming it is generated dynamically with the new template. Can you look at http://te.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%B0%AE%E0%B1%82%E0%B0%B8:%E0%B0%B5%E0%B0%BF%E0%B0%95%E0%B1%80%E0%B0%AA%E0%B1%80%E0%B0%A1%E0%B0%BF%E0%B0%AF%E0%B0%BE_%E0%B0%AA%E0%B1%8D%E0%B0%B0%E0%B0%95%E0%B0%9F%E0%B0%A8%E0%B0%B2%E0%B1%81 and fix the same. Thanks Arjunaraoc (talk) 07:24, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

I tried to fix it, but did not succeed, it is only showing three ads in overview. Help will be appreciated. Arjunaraoc (talk) 08:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Yes, the overview is generated dynamically and it should show the ads, that can be actually displayed, so if some ad isn't there, the template won't display it at all. I fixed the issue by changing the numbers. I also changed the template to use time, instead of number of edits, like you wanted. And finally, I discovered that ad #4 isn't displayed correctly in the overview, because it links to a category (it adds the page that displays the overview to that category instead of showing link) and I don't know how to fix that error. Maybe you can create a redirect to that category that isn't in the category namespace (like CAT:ఆంధ్ర ప్రదేశ్ జిల్లాలు, or with the Telugu abbreviation of “category” instead of CAT) and use it. Svick (talk) 14:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your help. I have updated the problem link to the article page. Thanks also for changing to time as the input for updating the next ad. Arjunaraoc (talk) 03:56, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing Athletic Conference template TheBigJagielka (talk) 23:10, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello, I hope you are doing fine and I sincerely apologize for this intrusion. I have just read your profile and you seem a learned person and you also like my favorite shows so maybe I am not bothering you and you will help us... and that might help saving the cheerleader in return... I'm part of an association "Amical de la Viquipèdia" which is trying to get some recognition as a Catalan Chapter but this has not been approved up to this moment because it does not belong to one state. We think there shouldn't be barriers between human people and knowledge but at the same time we also want to preserve our culture and language as the others which are a part of biodiversity. We (doctor House included even though he wouldn't daresay it...) would appreciate your support, visible if you stick this on your first page: {{Wikimedia CAT}}. Thanks again, wishing you a great summer, take care! Capsot (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

I think that any activity of this kind is beneficial, but I don't have anything in common with Catalan, so I don't see why should I specifically support Catalan chapter. Svick (talk) 20:04, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi Svick, thanks for your revert over at the STiki page. A curious form of damage that IP inflicted -- but damaging nonetheless. Thanks again, West.andrew.g (talk) 04:03, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I saw you reverted my change to {{Pending changes trial}}. I am guessing you know more about this than me. If that is the case, can you clarify the situation at Wikipedia talk:Pending changes#Unclear who gets to see the draft version of articles.? Yaris678 (talk) 23:48, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

User:LiberalFascist got it right – the distinction is logged-in vs. anonymous users. Also, logged-in users can change their settings to see the last accepted version on default. Svick (talk) 00:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Yeah. I see now that I misread what RobLa had written. Glad it is all sorted now. Yaris678 (talk) 11:56, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

"Anyone who does not float in this inundation is most condemned. Such a person cannot be delivered for millions of kalpas. PURPORT The kalpa is explained in the Bhagavad-gītā (8.17): sahasra-yuga-paryantam ahar yad brahmaṇo viduḥ. One day of Brahmā is called a kalpa. A yuga, or mahā-yuga, consists of 4,320,000 years, and one thousand such mahā-yugas constitute one kalpa. The author of Śrī Caitanya-caritāmṛta says that if one does not take advantage of the Kṛṣṇa consciousness movement of Śrī Caitanya Mahāprabhu, he cannot be delivered for millions of such kalpas." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.133.31.7 (talk) 11:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Eh? Svick (talk) 11:34, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Hello again Svick, I was just having a nosey at your page. It seems we have a few things in common, including our taste in TV shows. If you haven't already seen it, may I recommend Breaking Bad. As far as I'm concerned it's TV's best kept secret. Here in the UK it aired on FX, and hardly anyone I know has seen it. In the US it's an award winning show, which has just finished airing season 3. If you are like me, and you haven't heard of Breaking Bad, DON'T READ ABOUT IT FIRST! It's full of surprizes. All I'll say is it's a very dark black comedy. Těší mě! Kind regards, Nagualdesign (talk) 20:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the recommendation. The series looks interesting and other people say good things about it too, so I added it to my (already pretty long) list of TV series to watch. Svick (talk) 20:35, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

I really appreciate it, and I'm sure many others will too. --Eastlaw ^talk ⁄ _contribs 07:06, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

I'm glad I could help. Svick (talk) 09:26, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Tift County Schools requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Tamer of hope (talk) 17:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

This is not an article, but a redirect, so CSD A3 does not apply. In any case, I think this redirect is useful, so I removed the deletion template and fixed it. If you still think it should be deleted, you can send it to WP:RfD. Svick (talk) 18:50, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I wasn't sure how to classify a redirect deletion. But all of the pages that once pointed towards that page are linked to the right page. So that redirect page is just sitting there in limbo. Tamer of hope (talk) 23:53, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

I guess you are right, I tagged it as CSD G7, but now that I read what exactly that means, I'm not sure that applies either. Svick (talk) 00:28, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing my error. I can't believe that I made such a silly mistake. Nyttend (talk) 01:49, 1 July 2010 (UTC)

I've reverted two more edits by User:Flow in motion on Richard Clapton see [[1]]. I noted that a final warning was placed on the user's talkpage by you—I'll let you decide what needs to be done next.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:58, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

I now realize that the final warning was probably premature, so I warned him again. Svick (talk) 10:03, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

Moved to Talk:Ambiguous grammar#Microhunt. Svick (talk) 20:00, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Hello,

I am looking to revise Raphael's Wikipedia page per his manager and agent, Michael Lange. As previous editor to his page, are you willing to make the adjustments we seek? If not, I will do it on my end.

Please contact me as soon as you can.

frank spadafora 212/741/6606 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.125.27.74 (talk) 21:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I can help you. What kind of changes are you looking for?

If you want to make the changes yourself, you can, but you should read about coflict of interest on Wikipedia, use preview before you save your edit and consider creating an account. Svick (talk) 22:07, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Could you generate a listing of all the links in the list of cutaneous conditions that are redirects? ---kilbad (talk) 17:25, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

I have posted them at User:Svick/Cutaneous redirects. Svick (talk) 22:17, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your help at the pump! ENeville (talk) 02:41, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

''''''Microhunt'''''' http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Ambiguous_grammar&oldid=374642315 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Microhunt (talk • contribs) 16:12, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

...my new best metallic friend, Svickbot. Svick is also my new best warm-bodied friend. --Let Us Update Wikipedia: Dusty Articles 04:52, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi there. Thanks for fixing the url to your tool on my userpage. I doubt I would have spotted that for a very long while. Regards Wotnow (talk) 22:26, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I get a runtime error when I go to the Category Watchlist. Don't know whether that is a transient error or not, but thought I should let you know. (Great tool, thanks!). --Crusio (talk) 08:08, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, sorry about that. The hosting I use was supposed to shut down and I screwed up when trying to back it up. But since it seems it didn't shut down yet, I'll try to bring it back and look for a more permanent solution. Svick (talk) 11:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Okay, it should work for now, but I'm not sure how long will it last. Svick (talk) 12:19, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

• Looks like it's down again... Have you been able to find another solution? I use this tool daily and miss it greatly... --Crusio (talk) 00:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

  It's finally up. The address is http://svick.org/CatWatch.aspx. I restored a backup from 6 July there, so you will have to redo any changes in your list since then (if any) and all category changes since then will be listed today. Svick (talk) 16:22, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

• Wonderful!! Many thanks! --Crusio (talk) 16:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

The times displayed in the "last updated" column probably need to be fixed, as the timestamp currently says "6 Aug 2010 00:10:00" when the last check was at 09:10 CEST (at list "LeaguesAndCups" for the category "2009–10 domestic association football leagues" just in case it is relevant). I would naively assume that the time zone of the server is incorrectly put at PDT or something like that, so could you please check that? ^^" In any case, thank you very much for this useful tool!!! :-) Cheers, Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 07:41, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I know about that. When I switched to the new domain, the server's timezone changed too. What's wrong with PDT? And why is it better than CEST? I'll look into how to make this better. Svick (talk) 18:04, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

It is a little confusing for unsuspecting users when times are not displayed in their actual time zone.^^ Hm, how about just adding a note at the top of the lists declaring that "all times are listed in UTC−07:00" or something similar? That would probably be the easiest¹ solution. --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 18:15, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

¹Again, I don't know your code - such a note might as well be more difficult to implement than I assume...

It should show your local time, if you have JavaScript on, and time in UTC and a note about it otherwise. Could you check that it works for you? Thanks. Svick (talk) 23:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for the late response, I was (and still am) pretty busy over the weekend. As for the timestamp, it works like a charm now. Thanks a lot! --Soccer-holic^{I hear voices in my head...} 10:00, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, maybe you could help me with the following:

• All talk pages that have more than one instance of {{WikiProjectBannerShell}} or one of its redirects including {{WikiProjectBanners}} and its redirects.
• Articles that have [[en: in their body. AWB fails to fix these cases at the moment.

Thanks, Magioladitis (talk) 07:11, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Hi, the latest dump I have is pages-articles from June. It is probably corrupted (that's why it's not available anymore), but I think that's better than using the January dump. Because of that, I can't scan talk pages, so to scan for the WPBS I would have to get all the 140,000 pages from the API. But I think that's not that bad, and I could do that if you want. Or I could wait until the current dump is finished (that should be few days, I guess).

Do you want to include articles that have the [[en: inside a comment (like SSB)?

Svick (talk) 19:02, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

List of articles with [[en: from the June dump is at [2]. Svick (talk) 21:38, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the list. For the WPBS one I can wait no problem. -- Magioladitis (talk) 09:41, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Here are the results of the WPBS scan: [3]. Svick (talk) 09:47, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm writing to you because you seem to be a category expert.

I'm interested in looking at an example of an article about an economics book that is an FA or GA.

I can easily find Category:Economics books, and Category:Featured articles, so obviously, I simply need to find the intersection. I suspect this is easy, but I don't know how to do it.--SPhilbrickT 13:59, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

You can use CatScan to find that there are no articles that match your criteria. Svick (talk) 14:21, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks - I tried "good" article, and can find some examples that meet my needs.--SPhilbrickT 14:51, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I'm just using the examples to search for stuff. I don't know where else to do this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzzdrone (talk • contribs) 15:18, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

In that case, you should use the tool that actually chooses the page directly: random article from erwin85 and not edit the documentation. Svick (talk) 15:22, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

I have no idea what to put in the 'project' box. It gives me errors when I try to use that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuzzdrone (talk • contribs) 15:32, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Enter en in the first box (that's the code for English) and keep the second as it is (so that it says .wikipedia.org). Svick (talk) 15:36, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I notice you have written a few tools so though you would be a good person to ask. Is there a page where I can request a tool to be written?

I require a tool to go through pages in a category and summaries the templates used in those pages. I need is a list of how often each template is used in Category:Wikipedia requested photographs of people (and later others), so that I can then add the most common to User:People-photo-bot and move those pages to a subcategory.--Traveler100 (talk) 11:54, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

I think the best page to request that is Wikipedia talk:Database reports.

This seems simple enough, I could do that. What exactly do you want to know? Counts of all templates on pages in that category? Or just WikiProject banners? Svick (talk) 20:02, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Just WikiProject banners. For example, how many articles have {{WikiProject Baseball}} on it and so on. What I am looking for is which templates to addressed first that will make the most impact. --Traveler100 (talk) 20:43, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Here you go: [4]. Svick (talk) 00:27, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks you for the very quick response. --Traveler100 (talk) 04:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm talking about you at Wikipedia:Village_pump_(idea_lab)#Bumpbot, so thought I should tell you.--SPhilbrickT 21:33, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

One last problem, between Ottoman Dynasty-Occupation and Occupation-Republic there's a black line, but this line is not seen between "Vassals of Seljuks"-"under the Mongols" and "Saruhan"-"Ottoman dynasty". These lines seperate different periods of history of Turkey, so it's critical. Can you add only these 2 lines? Kavas (talk) 19:01, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Like this? Svick (talk) 19:10, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you, it's just what I want. Kavas (talk) 19:12, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm bothering you. When I choose "hide", the 2nd line (which is between "Saruhan"-"Ottoman Dynasty") is erased, but I want it to go between "Anatolian Beyliks"-"Ottoman Dynasty". When "show" is chosen the line should be between "Saruhan"-"Ottoman Dynasty" and when "hide" is chosen it should be between "Anatolian Beyliks"-"Ottoman Dynasty". Kavas (talk) 19:20, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Fixed. And you're not bothering me, I'm glad I could help. Svick (talk) 19:25, 18 August 2010 (UTC)

Thank you so much for creating that page. It automatically updates perfectly! Also, I wanted to know, can you design it so there is a third column that indicates either "Article" or "Redirect"? ---kilbad (talk) 18:44, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, no problem. Done. Svick (talk) 00:10, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Awesome! Thank you. Also, would it be possible to have automatically updated graphs of article and redirect creation overtime at the top of the page? ---kilbad (talk) 00:16, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I think I could do that, but it would take me quite some time. And I should concentrate on other things. Svick (talk) 00:21, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

Do you know any other editors that might be able to help me out? ---kilbad (talk) 00:32, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm not sure. You could try asking at WP:VPT. Svick (talk) 00:35, 21 August 2010 (UTC)

I just wanted to make you aware of an informal thread I started regarding a possible DermBOT. Perhaps you could share you thoughts on the matter? Thanks again for all your help in the past! ---kilbad (talk) 01:16, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi there, Could you please have a look at this post in the Help Desk for a second? User:Sphilbrick suggested you might be able to help in this category-related question. Thanks in advance, 93.173.28.155 (talk) 18:37, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Do you know the purpose of Index of climate change articles? There is a category Category:Climate change, and a lot of overlap, not surprisingly, but not complete overlap. I can also ask some of those editing the index list, but thought you might know the history or rationale.--SPhilbrickT 15:34, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Have a look at Wikipedia:Categories, lists, and navigation templates. Personally, I don't think lists as the one you linked are useful. Svick (talk) 18:11, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks alot for your help (from the Help Desk) man!

That category which couldn't be counted into the list is "Incomplete articles" - I'm thinking it's probably been set to behave this way on purpose, to not be included in certain queries.

I'd like to be so daring as to ask you for the code you use to run such queries;

I would like to use it to run more queries, such as getting the first 2000 categories (since most of the top categories are of Stub-topics and other "beaurocratic" matters), as well as a list of categories by total/average article size (kilobytes), etc. etc.

I promise to give credit if I ever publish any of the results anywhere, or also, publish them here on wiki somewhere.

Would that be ok? 85.250.35.206 (talk) 18:51, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

I could send you the code if you really wanted (it's in C#), but I think it would be better if you read about the API (that's how you access Wikipedia programmatically) and probably used one of the available libraries (that page talks about bots, but it applies to other programs too).

Also, I have updated the list of largest categories on hewiki, so that it now lists 2000 of them.

Svick (talk) 17:50, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

I'll get to researching, Thanks alot for all the help!!! 89.139.9.23 (talk) 10:12, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Svick, I am new to writing Wikipedia articles and I don't understand the purpose of your recent edits. Could you please explain them to me? RockMagnetist (talk) 02:18, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

You mean why I added ref = harv to {{cite book}}s in that article? It's so that the references created using {{harvnb}} linked correctly to the corresponding line in References. If you click on one of the references (e.g. “Pedlosky 1987”), the page will be moved to the correct line in references (although that's not very visible in this article) and that line will be highlighted. See also the explanation of the ref parameter at Template:Cite book#Description. Svick (talk) 17:49, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

OK, thanks. I copied the style of reference from somewhere, and I didn't even know why the Harvnb was there. RockMagnetist (talk) 22:05, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

I noticed your interest in Al-Andalus. Are you aware of the misuse of sources problem regarding Jagged 85? Please see WP:Jagged 85 cleanup for an overview. The Al-Andalus entry is at the bottom of Cleanup1b. If you have some knowledge in that area, it would be great if you were to carefully check the claims and sources added by the user to that article, then update Cleanup1b. If you have any comments, I will see a reply here. Johnuniq (talk) 23:09, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I have no knowledge in that area, so I can't help you with this one. Svick (talk) 05:22, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry for being a dick via my edit summary (on the stack overflow page). I was angry with the guy you were arguing with and assumed he'd made the mistake. TdwrighT 10:59, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi. As you recently commented in the straw poll regarding the ongoing usage and trial of Pending changes, this is to notify you that there is an interim straw poll with regard to keeping the tool switched on or switching it off while improvements are worked on and due for release on November 9, 2010. This new poll is only in regard to this issue and sets no precedent for any future usage. Your input on this issue is greatly appreciated. Off2riorob (talk) 23:50, 20 September 2010 (UTC)

I'm curious why you used a mathematical approach to {{Devanagari}}. Wouldn't a series of 10 replace statements (e.g. {{#replace:{{#replace:{{{1}}}|0|०}}|1|१}}) have been simpler and more flexible? Or is there more to Devanagari than straight digit substitution? —RobinHood70 ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:12, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Because AFAIK, there is no {{#replace}}. Generally, string manipulation in wikicode is very limited and, if it works at all, it's quite expensive (see e.g. {{str rep}}, that kind of does what your {{#replace}} does, except only for the first occurrence). I think the code is relatively understandable and simple (of course what it does is simple too). If you think there is a better way to do it, feel free to edit the template. Svick (talk) 22:48, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, you're right. (Didn't even notice I forgot to <nowiki> that, making it obvious that it doesn't work here.) It's normally part of the ParserFunctions/StringFunctions extension (see here), but it would appear at a glance that they've disabled the StringFunctions portion of it here. It's enabled at all of the other wikis I use, so I just took it for granted that it was here as well and never thought to look. Looking around, it looks like at some point, it either was or was intended to be enabled here, but clearly it's not now. Thanks for the reply and education. :) —RobinHood70 ^{(talk • contribs)} 23:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

		The da Vinci Barnstar
		For fixing the disaster that we call templates :) ΔT The only constant 18:46, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Svick (talk) 18:50, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

can i bother you to take a look at {{Infobox road}} see Newfoundland and Labrador Route 1 for one example. ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 12:21, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't notice this message before. I have fixed it for Newfoundland and Labrador routes, does this problem happen for other regions too? Svick (talk) 09:45, 19 September 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, see New Brunswick Route 915 and there are others too. ΔT _{^{The only constant}} 12:00, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

I have found a small, cosmetic issue with the DropDownToTabs.js script, when used in conjunction with Gadget-purgetab.js; In Internet Explorer, "Purge" is shown smaller then the other tabs, and misaligned as well. Checking the HTML source, I see the IE wraps the "Purge" list item in an extra, duplicate <span>, causing the span's style to be applied twice. I do not see it in Chrome. — Edokter • Talk • 15:54, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the report. It should be fixed now (after you bypass your cache). Svick (talk) 21:12, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

It is fixed. Thank you. — Edokter • Talk • 21:34, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Do you know if there is an enwiki category dump (I just need article titles in categories, not the actual content of articles)? I can't find a categorylinks enwiki dump at http://download.wikimedia.org/backup-index.html .Smallman12q (talk) 16:01, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

It's there, the last one is enwiki-20101011-categorylinks.sql.gz from the 11 October dump. Although the dump only contains page ids, so you are probably going to need page.sql.gz too. Svick (talk) 16:08, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the link. Do you happen to know how large they'll be uncompressed? (more or less than 50GB?)Smallman12q (talk) 16:25, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

My guess is that they should be less than that, but it's just a guess. Alternatively, you don't have to import them in a databse, but use my Wikipedia SQL dump parser (if you can program in .NET). Svick (talk) 16:40, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

I've written a php script at User:Smallman12q/CleanupListing.php that would create a cleanup table similar to the one at Wikipedia:Wine/Reports/Cleanup by article for Sep 2010(0). I don't have a toolserver account, and am not terribly comfortable with MySQL. I wanted to know if you'd be willing to look over the script and give it a go/debug it. It's only about 150 lines...its pretty much several nested foreach statements with a few SQL commands. It would be much appreciated.Smallman12q (talk) 23:33, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

I see you played around with the script a bit...did you get it to work on the toolserver in creating a working mysql table? Printing the output is fairly trivial...building the table is the hardest part.Smallman12q (talk) 22:15, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Getting a toolserver account is quite easy (I got mine very recently), so you might want to get one for yourself. Anyway, I fixed some issues with the script (you can't do cross-table update, when you don't have update right on both tables; WikiProject categories contain talk pages; and other smaller) and it seems to work now. The list of pages with catnumber > 0 is at [5]. Also, I noticed that some categories in the list (like the first one – Category:Articles with invalid date parameter in template) don't have monthly subcategories. Svick (talk) 23:27, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

- I'd get an account if they didn't require rl-authentication. Anyhow, you got the script to work...(you'll get a barnstar for that =D). As for the categories without the monthly subs, I took them from Category:Wikipedia maintenance categories sorted by month with a C# script...so those without subs should be removed from the php script and from that category.

Would you be willing to run this script nightly/weekly for relevant wikiprojects (once the variables are in, you could simply set a cron job for it). How should the tables be "shown"...should they be converted to wikicode and posted here...or should we show them with html/javascript? How would the info be archived(perhaps dumped into some directory as .sql.gz) Lastly...could you create a table similar to Wikipedia:Wine/Reports/Cleanup by category for Sep 2010(0)...it would essentially copy the article table, add a date column, update both tables, and at the end of cat remove rows where date column is null. Also it seems some of the article titles aren't displaying right...is that simply from printing the dump? Your thoughts and support are appreciated! Let me know what I can do to help. Smallman12q (talk) 00:49, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, running it periodically is no problem for me.

Showing the tables directly on toolserver would be the easier, so I'd probably go with that.

As for the archives, that depends on why you want them and what you want to do with them. But I think adding another column to the generated database would be best – that way, you can easily compute statistics or show old versions of the table.

That another report – that's exactly why I thought that having one column with the list of categories is a bad idea. Another table with a foreign key is much better.

As for the display problem – I think it's just that. My Firefox seems to show the names correctly (including e.g. Blóðughófi). Try setting it to show as UTF8.

As for your help, I would welcome it if you did anything of the stuff we're discussing, I'm probably going to work on in tomorrow.

Svick (talk) 18:36, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

You're right...works under UTF8. I don't have time to work on it today...but I should have time tmrw/friday. I'd propose the following folder structure:

root/cleanuplisting/project index.txt
root/cleanuplisting/project/archives...
root/cleanuplisting/project/report.txt
root/cleanuplisting/project/static pages with tables
root/cleanuplisting/project/html table w/js & css

in archives
root/cleanuplisting/project/archives/index.txt
root/cleanuplisting/project/archives/project-date.sql.gz

The tables would be archived at the end of run and dropped at each new run(or at end of run...depends on table sorter). Foreign keys would be good...though I'm not familiar enough with sql to know how to make it work with a list of categories. Once we get this worked out, I'd like to fix up the taskforce category(basically scan the parent WikiProject category for "task force/taskforce"), add another column for pageviews, and add the other relevant cats from Category:Wikipedia maintenance. I'll also write up the code for displaying and sorting the tables (table sorter). Thanks for helping me with this project=DSmallman12q (talk) 23:19, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

I have worked on it a bit and you can see the results at [6] and [7]. The code is at [8]. I still don't understand why do you want to have archives in separate files (when you can keep them in the database forever, if you mark them with a timestamp) and I ignored the rest of your proposed folder structure too (at least for now). Svick (talk) 01:52, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Look's good. Don't worry about the directory layout...I'd just like to have a snapshot dump archived somewhere at the end of each run...(would make it easier to generate stats in the future). Also, there doesn't really seem to be a need to have a dynamically generated file...you could simply create static .html files at the end of the run rather than "CleanupListingByCat.php?project=Equine". Add a few more columns (# of categories, pageviews, task force), a table sorter, and a csv output and we're done. Great job thus far...will try to improve tmrw.Smallman12q (talk) 02:35, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

I think most of it is done now. Notes:

1. The URLs changed a bit, there is a new index at [9].
2. I think dynamic pages are better, because they are easier to write and things like sorting work well there.
3. I don't know how to get pageviews in a reasonable way (parsing [10] seems like too much work for little benefit).
4. I don't know how to get taskforces, because there doesn't seems to be any standard way to get taskforces of certain WikiProject.
5. Dumping each run into a file would make it harder to create statistics than in the current system. E.g. to get the counts of categories for certain article for all past runs, you can simply use a query like this:

   mysql> select time, (select count(*) from categories where categories.article_id = articles.id) as count from runs join articles on runs.id = articles.run_id where article = 'Donkey';
   +---------------------+-------+
   | time                | count |
   +---------------------+-------+
   | 2010-10-31 17:03:38 |    10 |
   | 2010-10-31 18:14:54 |    10 |
   +---------------------+-------+
   2 rows in set (0.01 sec)
   

   But in your system, you would have to parse several files.

Svick (talk) 18:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

You've done a fine job at bringing this project to life. I made a small commit (I haven't used git style forking/pushing/pulling before). For the csv, couldn't you use mysql OUTFILE? Otherwise, it looks fine to me. We should start a sub page of where to list participating wikiprojects, and report bugs/feature requests. Thanks a lot Svick!Smallman12q (talk) 22:10, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Regarding git, you should set your username and email (see e.g. [11]), so that you can see from the commit who made it. The email doesn't have to be an actual e-mail address, but it can be something like smallman12q@enwiki, if you prefer.

I have created the subpage, but I think listing the WikiProjects is better left for toolserver (so that there is no additional work with keeping the list up to date).

I don't know how OUTFILE works, so maybe it could be used. But I don't see the point of doing that, when CSV already works.

Svick (talk) 23:31, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

I set up my git settings. The program looks good to go...except for one thing:At CleanupListing.php, it doesn't seem that the line

$sql = "SELECT id FROM projects WHERE name = $project"; is right. Did you mean $project_name? Also please be sure to use mysql_real_escape_string() to prevent mysql injections. OUTFILE is relatively simple (and significantly faster), though it's not for dynamic pages. If you want a simple example see this stackoverflow question.

Please put a note at the village pump asking people to sign up their wikiproject (or sign them up manually...or I'll put a note=P). Thanks again for making this a reality=DSmallman12q (talk) 23:28, 2 November 2010 (UTC)

You could start by including the wikiprojects listed at Category:WolterBot cleanup listing subscriptions.Smallman12q (talk) 00:12, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Good catch about that bug. It should be fixed now and I have (hopefully) fixed the SQL injections too. I'll do the rest later (probably tomorrow). Svick (talk) 00:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

I see you started making some reports for some of the WikiProjects...are you entering these in by hand (its an odd selection atm). Why is sociology not showing class/importance? Also, I filed a bug report for firefox for not rendering the table correctly. Have you set up a cron job for the program to run every day or week?Smallman12q (talk) 00:56, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

I have added all the WikiProjects from the WolterBot's category, but not all projects follow the same naming scheme for their categories, so not all of them show in the table for now. Svick (talk) 18:26, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Just curious...how long does it take to generate the cleanup table for the wikiproject? Offline, I was able to do mine in about 3-4 seconds with a Hashset. Is there anything else that needs work for this script...or does it just need a few more logic statements to handle non-conforming projects?Smallman12q (talk) 02:12, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

The varies greatly, depending on the size of the project. Until now, for huge project like WikiProject Ships it took 20 minutes. I have optimized it now, so it should take only about 4 minutes. And I have to now run it completely without encountering an error and then fix the non-conforming projects. Svick (talk) 16:39, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

A LIKE is certainly faster than a loop=PSmallman12q (talk) 17:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

Everything should be working, except some projects don't have classes now, but for most of them they will be added on the next run. I have set it up so that the listing for every project is updated once a week. I'm going to start the spamming of all WikiProjects I have added and some wider talk pages. Svick (talk) 17:45, 7 November 2010 (UTC)

Did you add support for non-month categories? If so, you could add some more cats from Category:Wikipedia maintenance. Also, as the cleanup by cat doesn't have sorting...should we add a javascript table sorter? (Nice TOC btw...could do some simple stats in the future). Looks good thus far!Smallman12q (talk) 00:11, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Also, if the program is done, should we write something for the Wikipedia Signpost?Smallman12q (talk) 00:31, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Kind of, I have added support for categories that have only year, not month (see e.g. [12]). Having categories completely without dating would require some more work. I have just added sorting to listing by category too, although not by month (because of the way I get it from the database). Regarding Signpost, I have no idea. Svick (talk) 00:40, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

I could write a short blurb for signpost. No reason your work shouldn't be recognized=P.

Svick has created a WikiProject cleanup listing for wikiprojects at the toolserver. The program written in PHP and MYSQL will run weekly and provide list all articles that are currently tagged for cleanup/maintenance. The list which is available by wikiproject, category, by category month, by article name, article quality, and article importance is also available in CSV. The program will act as a replacement for WolterBot and supersede CleanupLisitngBot. The original PHP/MYSQL prototype was coded by Smallman12q who will help maintain the code. The source is available at github. To add your WikiProject, please leave a note here.

If the above is fine, I'll submit it to Signpost for the Technology Report section. Smallman12q (talk) 01:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

At CleanupListingByCat, should it be GROUP BY as opposed to "ORDER BY year, month"?Smallman12q (talk) 14:12, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

No, ORDER BY is correct. It's so that the month column is the oldest month for that category, if there are more. Svick (talk) 22:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, the text looks fine. One thing though, is CleanupListingBot worth mentioning? It seems you just made few tests with it. If people know about it (and are expecting it), then it seems like a useful information, but I think not otherwise. Svick (talk) 22:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

Well it was fully working...but as it only made a handful of test listings...I agree that there's no need to mislead. I've made the posting at Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/Newsroom/Suggestions#November_1.E2.80.93. Cheers!Smallman12q (talk) 01:00, 10 November 2010 (UTC)