Welcome!

Hello, Stronach, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies (talk) 00:25, 28 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

		The Exceptional Newcomer Award
		That's some fantastic work on Stiff Leadbetter! Hopefully there are many more great articles to come. the wub "?!" 23:13, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 8 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Stiff Leadbetter, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 04:09, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there. Footnotes are really nice when you get the hang of them, and you're well on your way to knowing how to use them. I see that you found Template:Cite web and used it well. That works fine, although for some of the in-line cites in your article I would have used Template:Cite news as they were news stories of one kind or another. But that not very important.

I went back and had a look at that red lettering for you and the only mistake you made was to forget the "s. You wrote <ref name=Daily Mail> when it should have been <ref name="Daily Mail">. The bot caught that and that's why the red disappeared. I added an Info box for you. Nice article, by the way. Manxruler (talk) 22:55, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sleddale Hall, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 03:06, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ashcombe cover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 09:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC) --J Milburn (talk) 09:53, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've just realised that the image should be on IFD, not PUI. I'm moving it now, then we can continue the discussion there. J Milburn (talk) 10:26, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion is now here, I'm moving your comment over as we speak, and will then reply. J Milburn (talk) 10:27, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 2 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ferne House, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 18:51, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Papillifera papillaris is done! I think you should thank to User:Invertzoo who made the main part of the article. Have a nice day. --Snek01 (talk) 18:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi to you Stronach. Snek and I work fast, it is true, even though he is a snail (snek means snail as you might already know). Actually I was glad to get this article done, as I recently put together an article List of non-marine molluscs of Great Britain as well as the same thing for Ireland, and doing the Papillifera papillaris article meant there would be one less red link on the GB list. Also, it is always nice to get requests, because it shows that someone else is interested in snails! Invertzoo (talk) 21:06, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well you just proved to me that you know more about them than the average person does! Good for you. I hope the nearby Roman snails do well and avoid ending up in the saucepan! Are you in Bucks? I live near Central Park and despite acidic soil, we even have one or two grove snails there. So, if you ever want to request another mollusk article, or have a mollusk-related question, please feel free to ask. Invertzoo (talk) 21:46, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

On 5 November, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Punch bowl, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 19:47, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry can't help right now (interviewing for next 3 hours). If its not sorted I'll look tonight but suggest Wikipedia:Requests for administrator attention.— Rod ^talk 12:44, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Lytes Cary at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! CarpetCrawler^{message me} 23:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC) CarpetCrawler^{message me} 23:52, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On September 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Holy Trinity Church, Trowbridge, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Wikiproject: Did you know? 11:21, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up about my photo of Trinity Church on the DYK section of the main page, glad you liked the photo. Unfortunately I just got your message today so I wasn't able to catch it while it was on the main page. I saw it in the archive though. Much appreciated! --Greg (talk) 20:16, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Made the move from 'beating' as per various discussions on the talk page, in which you took part in favour of the move. -- Ishel99 (talk) 02:11, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On December 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Christina Broom, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 19:42, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On December 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Punch Bowl (Mayfair), which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 19:42, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The proper place to make your request is at Wikipedia talk:Did you know. I am not sure how likely you are to succeed however. --Allen3 ^talk 15:26, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On April 21, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Embrace Life, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 06:03, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin so I can't do this either. Best to put a request on Wikipedia:Requested moves, but it looks as if it will take a few days for anyone to get round to it.— Rod ^talk 17:14, 18 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stronach, I have re-written the main article of Leviathan melvillei and will continue to improve it in the future. If you have any queries or comments, please convey them to me.-LeGenD (talk) 18:04, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stronach. You have new messages at Grim23's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

John Angus Lushington Moore Hamilton died on 13 June 1913 and that is less than 100 year ago. http://www.angloboerwar.com/Other/war_correspondents.htm --Egel _Reaction? 18:19, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Some kind soul has changed it to the more-appropriate UK licence, which is only 70 years, so problem solved. Stronach (talk) 18:41, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK project (nominate) 06:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Farms for City Children, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.farmsforcitychildren.org.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 14:15, 4 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

{{admin help}}

(Copied from something I put on the COI noticeboard page yesterday; no reply there as yet and I think the matter is quite pressing):

Not sure if I am in the right place. A new editor, User:Tim Ellis RIBA, has been removing cited material from the article on Sleddale Hall. On his talk page he says he is the Tim Ellis who now owns Sleddale Hall (and I have no proof he is, but then again no reason to doubt him). The material he has been removing is about the Hall being boarded up, as he wishes to discourage people from breaking in. It is a historic fact that the Hall has been boarded up for years and a Guardian article reflected this in its reporting; I am somewhat loathe to remove this reference as it is part of the 'story' of Sleddale Hall. But I am no expert on COI editing or what would be prudent in this situation: does what he want take precedence over objective reporting of facts? How much can we 'bend' to help him, if at all? Can anyone step in and advise please? And what's the position on his COI editing? (I assume I haven't outed him, given his editing name ...) Stronach (talk) 21:38, 15 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I should add the conversation between us so far has taken place on his talk page User talk:Tim Ellis RIBA rather than the Sleddalle Hall page. Stronach (talk) 08:04, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see that having the information in the article is important, and so I don't see that removing it does any harm. Since there are genuine grounds for concern about publicising the information, it seems to me it may as well be removed. This seems to me to be a case where, despite conflict of interest, the user's editing is reasonable. However, I will suggest to him that requesting an edit might sometimes be better. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:48, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, please place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page.

I am watching the War Horse (film) page (which I have put a lot of work into), and it is starting to attract vandalism. When I last checked my watchlist, there were three separate vandalism edits. I have undone them one by one but please, how do I undo them all in one go and restore to the previous good edit by me? I sometimes see in an edit summary something like 'restored to previous good version by So-and-so' - how do I do this? (and also, have I undone the three edits correctly?) Thanks in advance. Stronach (talk) 21:26, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Try using WP:TWINKLE and (after the "installation", see the manual at the page there) you can choose the edit you want and restore the page to an edit you want. Alternatively: If there is too much vandalism, propose WP:semi protection for that page. mabdul 21:49, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you Mabdul. Twinkle looks just the job. Stronach (talk) 07:04, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The windmill looks like it's CGI, not a real mill. Mjroots (talk) 15:00, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just because Spielberg said it don't necessarily mean that it's true. It may be identifiable once more becomes available. Mjroots (talk) 15:14, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flicked through a copy of "War Horse, the making of the motion picture" yesterday and it's clear from the photographs that it is "real", in the sense of being a full-sized 3-dimensional physical object, albeit a set for the film, the "tail" ladder runs up to a door in the side of the mill. The text says it was built on the Stratfield Saye estate. Ghughesarch (talk) 15:43, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited War Horse (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kathleen Kennedy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to articles relating to the music of the 2012 Olympics opening ceremony. Vincent Liu (something to say?) 11:12, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh how kind! Thank you Vincent. Stronach (talk) 16:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suttirat Anne Larlarb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page National Theatre (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Carcharodon hubbelli, Stronach!

Wikipedia editor Kieranian2001 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Reviewed as part of page curation. Interesting short article, references and categories included.Kieranian2001 (talk) 13:00, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Kieranian2001's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suttirat Anne Larlarb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vanity Fair (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:53, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are you working on promoting the article to Featured article status!? --Another Believer _(Talk) 17:56, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. No, I'm just very interested in the ceremony and want the page to be as good as it can be. If anything, I prefer content creation to the buffing up for GAs and FAs - I've only been fiddling with the refs because they've been bugging me for so long, having them in different formats ... Are you going to try to FA it? Stronach (talk) 18:04, 13 March 2013 (UTC) (I haven't finished with the refs, by the way. There's only so much of that sort of job I can take at a time ... Stronach (talk) 18:21, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gosh, I've never attempted to take an article I did not write myself to FA status. I feel I have to be pretty familiar with the subject to even attempt GA status, let alone FA status. I don't think I am up to the task at this time, but I appreciate your work on the article and hope to see it achieve FA status one day! --Another Believer _(Talk) 18:22, 13 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know what you mean, about needing to be familiar with an article. I've been plugging away at this one since before the event [I checked my IP contribs and I didn't - started the morning after.] (sometimes as a BT dynamic IP - don't always remember to log in) and feel I know it pretty well and have read lord knows how many articles about it; it's just I don't go in for shiny geegaws (a lot of extra work is involved as well). I just keep it on my watchlist and try to check how it's looking every now and then, and add pertinent info as and when it crops up ...Stronach (talk)

That's really great. I have to say though, forget about the shiny star, promoting an article to Featured status can feel very rewarding. If you finally get to a point where you feel your work on the article is "complete", consider asking a few editors (myself included) to assist you with the FA process. Just a thought... Best! --Another Believer _(Talk) 15:13, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers - I appreciate your kind words. I should make clear that I didn't have anything to do with getting it to GA at all. I will bear the FA idea in mind but I'm not sure I can be convinced right now - these last two days have been my 'weekend' and so I've had time to work on it (needed as Danny Boyle has been doing a lot of press recently to do with his new film and has been talking for the first time properly about the ceremony, also a video of an October talk he gave on it has just surfaced), but generally I don't have too much time to devote to it and I couldn't commit to a schedule or be able to answer questions/re-edit when demanded by others. Also - I have a fear that the main page is a vandal magnet. But thanks for you kind offer. ... (A few minutes later) Oh I am embarrassed - I have just looked at your most impressive user page and I hope in the light of what I see there, that you weren't offended by my geegaws comment! *extracts foot from mouth and offers belated congratulations for your many fine achievements*. Stronach (talk) 15:24, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message re cauldron video; I've uploaded it. Was vary about audio copyright (Caliban's Dream) so removed audio. Cheers.--Richj1209 (talk) 14:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello AB - I did a lot of the original writing for the 2012 OC article, came back to it when we were getting it to GA, and have done some more work on it these last few days to pull it into shape and edit out some of the flabbiness it picked up this past year. I haven't done much else on WP so the FA process is mostly unknown to me, but am up for helping if there is someone experienced who can point the way. For GA someone reviewed the article and then I picked up a long list of action points before it got through the hoop - is FA similar? IanB2

Hi Ian. I'm not sure if AB watches my page - did you leave this message on his/hers as well? Thanks for all the fantastic work you've done on the article. I'm not able to commit to helping with any FA bid as I have a lot of work on and I have a feeling it is a very time-consuming process, but am certainly happy to help with quotes from the sources I have, if needed (the Amy Raphael book, official programme, detailed article in Q, the BBC DVD of the ceremony etc etc) and any other general help I can give. Cheers Stronach (talk) 08:19, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again - many thanks -and yes I posted him (as a Jason hopefully I am on firm ground this time) a note. I remember when I first found the article it did look as if it needed work. Giving it a structure linked to the chronology of the ceremony, referencing everything and removing all the overlaps was a lot of work, and of course you and others did a lot more especially on the music where I had little value to add. I'm pleased that such a reasonaby high profile page is still in pretty good shape after a year of open editing, and apart from the official materials (which are quite hard to navigate) think we've come closest to providing a definitive account of a magical event (whilst hopefully avoiding too much bias!)? We haven't suffered too much deliberate vandalism, either?IanB2 p.s. I am fairly sure your note to DB would have reached him p.p.s. with last night the first showing of the Done & Dusted cut, it was great to see a few new shots of what by now seems such a familiar event. It is easy to forget the influence of the particular shots and angles chosen.

Hi Ian. I didn't watch all of last night's showing, but what I did see looked to me to be a very slightly condensed version of the version on the DVD ie Danny Boyle's cut. On the commentary on the DVD that he did with Frank Cottrell Boyce, Boyle talks about some of the changes he made, such as inserting the sepia 'photos' of the soldiers, and a shot of the workers slaving underground in the ?beam engine in the Pandemonium section. Some of the edits were clearly to correct mistakes in the original - such as the camera flashes not going off when Kenneth Branagh stepped into the photography carousel. Annoyingly I didn't record the event when it went out live (I thought it was going to be rubbish so didn't bother ...), so now I only know the DVD version! I should change my user page as I have added more than just the music to the page - the 'Preparations', Technical aspects' 'Awards and accolades' and 'Legacy' sections are largely mine ...! You're right about there not being too much vandalism - I just worry that were it to get featured on the front page it could be buggered up. Hey ho. Good luck if you decide to take it for an FA. Cheers Stronach (talk) 09:49, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

interesting - I bought my mother the DVD but haven't seen it myself, yet - must borrow it. I understood the ceremony had been filmed by three separate outfits - the BBC, who did the live broadcast in the UK and whose version was on iPlayer for most of last year, the OBS, whose version is now on Youtube and clearly different in places from the BBC version, and Done & Dusted filmed for Danny Boyle, which I thought was shown last night, as Done & Dusted were in the credits. But maybe BBC3 showed a Director's cut of the original BBC material, which would explain why it is similar/the same as the BBC DVD? Or more likely it's Danny's D&D version that is on the DVD, but was new to me last night. All I know for sure is I've now seen three versions! IanB2

My understanding is that in the end OBS was responsible for filming all the protocol parts - the flag business, speeches, oaths and the athlete's parade. Boyle wanted the ceremony to be shot 'filmically', and didn't think the OBS was up to it, so brought in Done and Dusted, who were filming all the non-OBS bits along with the BBC. I'm more than likely to have got this wrong though .... I know after the event Boyle was cross as a lot of the shots he wanted weren't made. He's quite forthright about it on the commentary. Stronach (talk) 10:44, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

IanB2, yes, the FA process is very similar to the GA process, where reviewers examine the article and nominators address any concerns they may have. I am not as familiar with the content of this article as you and Stronach, so I would not be comfortable taking on an FA nomination myself. However, if you two wish to tackle the concerns raised, I'd be happy to submit a nomination on our behalf. That being said, it seems like changes are still being made to the article. When activity has slowed and article authors believe the article is "complete" and meets FA criteria, let me know! --Another Believer _(Talk) 14:54, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wispers, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Observer and Guardian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:03, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi I've returned to do some editing on Lytes Cary on which you did good stuff years ago. Using Garnett page 15 as a source you describe a water tower built to imitate a dovecote, however English Heritage thinks it is a dovecote (see NHLE listing & Somerset Historic Environment Record - which includes a note about a claim that it is a 20th C water tower). If you still have a copy of Garnett can you look & see exactly what it says?— Rod ^talk 15:41, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rod. Garnett 15 says 'The Apostle Garden. Aligned on the front door and the water tower (built in imitation of the Avebury Manor dovecote) this formal approach takes its name form the twelve yew bushes planted by the Jenners that flank the agreeably undulating stone path.' The caption to the photo looking down the path towards the dovecote/water tower on the same page says 'The Apostle Garden takes its name from the yew bushes that line the front path. The vista is aligned on the water-tank, which the Jenners modelled on a traditional circular dovecote.' Leopold and Nora Jenner lived at Avebury Manor from 1902 - Leopold was the brother of Sir Walter Jenner who bought Lytes Cary in 1907. Hope this helps. Stronach (talk) 10:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the additional detail. I still don't know how to resolve this with English Heritage & Somerset County Council saying it is a dovecote, beyond the "fudge" I've already put in the article.— Rod ^talk 18:25, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bingo! The 2nd edition OS 6" map (1900) [1] shows nothing there. Compare with Google Earth. Case closed, m'lud. Stronach (talk) 19:43, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK can you edit that para. I would leave in the link to EH etc but say that it must be recent & use the map as the source - I don't think that counts as OR.— Rod ^talk 19:50, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Will do. I'm impressed with your work on Montacute, Tyntesfield etc by the way.Stronach (talk) 19:54, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. What else do you think is needed on Lytes Cary to get it to GA standard? We have big issues with loads of copyvios on Tyntesfield, but I'm also working on Clevedon Court, Hestercombe House, Leigh Court, Cleeve Abbey and/or Nettlecombe Court, many of which are included at List of National Trust properties in Somerset. Any help or guidance in improving these articles would be gratefully received.— Rod ^talk 20:48, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just to let you know I've filled out a form for English Heritage asking them to look again at their description (and possibly classification) of this structure.— Rod ^talk 19:18, 22 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2012 Summer Olympics opening ceremony may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:25, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Based on your past editing activity, you may want to comment at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Theatre#Award enumeration.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:10, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sibyl Dunlop, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Moonstone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:17, 10 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your upload of File:7 Temple of Harmony SW facade (long side) 4.JPG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:13, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Another one of your uploads, File:6 Temple of Harmony SW facade (long side) 2.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Another one of your uploads, File:8 Temple of Harmony portico 1.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:12, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Another one of your uploads, File:5 Temple of Harmony NW facade 4.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:17, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Another one of your uploads, File:9 Temple of Harmony portico 2.JPG, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:12, 4 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Tractate Middoth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ATV (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Following our discussion back in May about the 20th century water tower described on the National Heritage List for England as an 18th century dovecote.... I have been through various processes to ask English Heritage to re-examine this. As of 12 December their record now describes it as a water tower built c.1934. Thanks for spotting this. I'm thinking again about trying to improve the article and any help would be appreciated.— Rod ^talk 09:47, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rod, well done on your efforts in getting it re-described. Some red faces at EH I hope! As you can probably see from my contributions log, I'm not on Wikipedia much these days - too much work on. So I'm afraid I won't be able to muck in with trying to bump the article up. Sorry about that. Hope you get on okay with it. Have you tried architectural bods like Wetman or Giano? Cheers Stronach (talk) 14:17, 15 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbara Toy, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages John Murray and James Hilton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that, per WP:RS/IMDb, IMDb is not considered a reliable source and should not be used in citations. Thanks! DonIago (talk) 15:53, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbara Toy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Jawf (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barbara Toy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stronach,

My name is Tim Hunt, and I would like to edit the County J section. I was in the London 2012 Olympics Opening Ceremony - County J - and I have been compiling a list of all of the participants of County J

Hope that this is OK.

Tim Hunt — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tim Hunt 2000 (talk • contribs) 13:15, 8 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Tim. I'd rather you didn't. The page is my own personal research page and is for accounts of the Green and Pleasant Land and Pandemonium sections of the opening ceremony. It's not a register of the names of those who took part (if it was I'd just have copied out all the names in the back of the Official Programme - and besides, Wikipedia doesn't encourage nominal rolls and lists of people involved in events, unless each person is notable in their own right rather than having taking part in a notable event.) Of course if you have found any more accounts I'd love to know of them, but would appreciate it if you let me know here. Congratulations for being part of such an amazing production - you must be very proud! Stronach (talk) 15:00, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Another Country Daniel Day Lewis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stronach. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to A wigwam for a goose's bridle, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Jaywjay03 (talk) 18:15, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warned by a new user for making a perfectly constructive edit. Great! I differentiated between UK English and Australian English for etymological reasons, to make clear the origin of the phrase.

Hello, Stronach. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Caliban's Dream". Since you had some involvement with the "Caliban's Dream" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so.  — PinkAmpers&^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 22:08, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stronach. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, David Nolan (musician), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~~Cheers~~Mgbo120 18:30, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stronach. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:David Nolan (musician).

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:33, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stronach

Thank you for creating Vera West.

User:TheLongTone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Interesting article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLongTone}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheLongTone (talk) 15:32, 7 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sussex Safer Roads Partnership is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sussex Safer Roads Partnership until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Neiltonks (talk) 23:15, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at Terry English. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 19:42, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dmitry Moor 1941 What have you done to help the front.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Wikiacc (¶) 07:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC) Wikiacc (¶) 07:38, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited John Cornford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Another Country. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 December 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article John Halle's Hall, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the medieval John Halle's Hall is the foyer of a cinema? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Halle's Hall. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, John Halle's Hall), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stronach. Thank you for your work on List of hall houses in England. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article. It was really interesting to learn more about this housing type.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 23:26, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Netherzone: You're most welcome - glad you found it useful. It's a list that I fear will never be complete due to the sheer number of hall houses in England, but at least some of the most notable ones can be highlighted. They're worth a gander if you're ever on this side of the pond - I can heartily recommend the Weald and Downland Living Museum, where quite a few are displayed. Thank you for saying thank you! Stronach (talk) 15:28, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Apethorpe Palace, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Country Life.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stronach. Thank you for your work on Attenborough and the Giant Dinosaur. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hello! I want to inform you that I have checked your article and mark it as reviewed. Have a good day and thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 15:39, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]