Archive pages:

pre May 2004 | May 2004 | June 2004 | July 2004 | August 2004 | September 2004 | October 2004–December 2004 | 2005 | 2006 | January 2007–November 2007 | December 2007 | January 2007–May 2008 | June 2008–June 2009 | Current

---

Hi. You deleted my contribution because "Article about a real person, which does not indicate the importance or significance of the subject" - but my article made clear this is a published author. Can you suggest how I should proceed? Thanks!

Tishtosh20 (talk) 23:58, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just dropping by to see how you're doing. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:12, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you erase the Kan'Nal album information. The A9 thing says that it is only if there is not main article for the group but there is? I am confused. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dwymore (talk • contribs) 00:54, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If there were a textbook for WP:BLP1E, the case it covered would be the Star Wars Kid. :-) He made the mistake of leaving a videotape in a school recorder, and became internationally famous, thanks to some idiot classmates. Now, if he had tried to cash in on that, instead of keeping his head down and suing for invasion of privacy, that would be a different story. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, and for the catch. UW's style guide wants an en dash in the campus name, and per MOS:DASH it's correct to use an en dash in the title when it properly belongs there. Hence my effort. I recreated and redirected the categories yesterday, but since Kaplan's all by himself in the Oshkosh faculty category, I simply missed that one. I've fixed that slip. Thanks again, Kevin Forsyth (talk) 12:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Could you add this functionality to my account, please.

Cheers

Fortnum (talk) 00:18, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers for that. Fortnum (talk) 16:46, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

00:57, 23 September 2009 Stormie (talk | contribs) deleted "Ask Sponsored Listings" ‎ (G11: Unambiguous advertising or promotion)

Hello Stormie, unfortunately you deleted a page of importance to our business. A page was already created with lower case Ask sponsored listings, however it needs to be capitalized. I went in and created a new page capitalized 'Ask Sponsored Listings' and you took it down because it was duplicated content from the 'Ask sponsored listings' page. Is there any way we can get the content from the 'Ask sponsored listings' page and capitalize Sponsored Listings so we have the ability to link the ariticle from the 'Ask.com' page. Please help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bbottorff (talk • contribs) 23:37, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Stormie, I saw your message on my talk page and I decided to have a look at this man but I didn't find any results which may clarify what it seems to be a hoax. Given the results and the lack of sources, I dare say that this article is fake and has no relevance. Regards, --Góngora (Talk) 03:12, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stormie, I was wondering if you could update us at WP:NEWTREAT about your newbie articles? What was it and did it survive 7 days? Thanks ϢereSpielChequers 17:44, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Righteous Sock Barnstar
		Awarded to Stormie for meritorious socking at WP:Newbie treatment at CSD :) ϢereSpielChequers 19:11, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar? He's lucky he wasn't blocked for using a sockpuppet to create such a flagrant BLP violation. Mr.Z-man 00:09, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're such a voice of reason. I was in the midst of crafting a post about the talk page when my browser froze and I had to reboot it. (One of my few beefs about Firefox.) Thanks for providing a calming voice. Wildhartlivie (talk) 07:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it was appreciated, though it seems to have started a bit at Charles Manson, although I think we'll work that out when I actually get around to formulating my comments regarding the content the newer editor added then readded after I removed it. I'm not thinking including content calling even Manson related to someone "colored" is helpful. My real concern is the apparent bias, which just doesn't wash when working on articles for criminals. Thanks again! Wildhartlivie (talk) 00:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You deleted my page for alleged ads! --Itayb1 (talk) 05:12, 14 January 2010 (UTC) why u deleted my page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Swera (talk • contribs) 07:35, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the NA date for WOW. I've include both dates in WC:O&H, and you might include both in WOH. --Philcha (talk) 07:12, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've been going through a database dump of the Nostalgia Wikipedia, a copy of the Wikipedia database from 20 December 2001, to find anomalies with old usernames. I found this edit to Pixies] under your username. I've imported it into the English Wikipedia, and it now appears like this; see principles 6 and 7 of User:Graham87/Import to find out why the edit appears as it does. do you remember if you made that edit, or was it a different person who chose the username "Stormie"? When Wikipedia switched to a MySQL database in January 2002, all old account information was erased, so it is entirely possible that it was a different person.

I've also changed some level 1 headings on your talk page to level 2 headings, to fix the TOC; hope you don't mind. Graham87 08:21, 30 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Stormie. Because you participated in Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2009 October 2#Bullshido.net, you may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bullshido.net (4th nomination). Cunard (talk) 21:21, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cool, will do! I still blunder around with this technical stuff. Thanks for your help. Cheers, Cardinal Wurzel (talk) 07:47, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, i would like to inform of a discussion on in the WikiProject Rugby Union discussion page about the format to be used through the season articles of the super 12, super 14 and super rugby seasons. Please click the link below and have your opinion, thank you. JaFa 01 (talk) 05:24, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Link: Discussion

Thanks for uploading File:JohnHayes.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 17:26, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article V18 engine is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/V18 engine until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 19:57, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I got your name from this list, and thought you might be interested in a meetup in Sydney at the Alexandria Hotel tomorrow. I hope you can join us. Sorry for the late notice. --99of9 (talk) 10:50, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Stormie,

My name is Jonathan Obar user:Jaobar, I'm a professor in the College of Communication Arts and Sciences at Michigan State University and a Teaching Fellow with the Wikimedia Foundation's Education Program. This semester I've been running a little experiment at MSU, a class where we teach students about becoming Wikipedia administrators. Not a lot is known about your community, and our students (who are fascinated by wiki-culture by the way!) want to learn how you do what you do, and why you do it. A while back I proposed this idea (the class) to the communityHERE, where it was met mainly with positive feedback. Anyhow, I'd like my students to speak with a few administrators to get a sense of admin experiences, training, motivations, likes, dislikes, etc. We were wondering if you'd be interested in speaking with one of our students.

So a few things about the interviews:

• Interviews will last between 15 and 30 minutes.
• Interviews can be conducted over skype (preferred), IRC or email. (You choose the form of communication based upon your comfort level, time, etc.)
• All interviews will be completely anonymous, meaning that you (real name and/or pseudonym) will never be identified in any of our materials, unless you give the interviewer permission to do so.
• All interviews will be completely voluntary. You are under no obligation to say yes to an interview, and can say no and stop or leave the interview at any time.
• The entire interview process is being overseen by MSU's institutional review board (ethics review). This means that all questions have been approved by the university and all students have been trained how to conduct interviews ethically and properly.

Bottom line is that we really need your help, and would really appreciate the opportunity to speak with you. If interested, please send me an email at obar@msu.edu (to maintain anonymity) and I will add your name to my offline contact list. If you feel comfortable doing so, you can post your nameHERE instead.

If you have questions or concerns at any time, feel free to email me at obar@msu.edu. I will be more than happy to speak with you.

Thanks in advance for your help. We have a lot to learn from you.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Obar --Jaobar — Preceding unsigned comment added by 35.9.115.210 (talk) 20:14, 2 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a classical music edit-a-thon Saturday week (13 October) in Sydney. The theme will be Music of France, to coincide with the ABC Classic FM countdown between 8-14 October. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online during the countdown. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/October 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:45, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to a disability edit-a-thon Saturday week (10 November) in Sydney. If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online before, during and after the meetup. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/November 2012. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 15:26, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

Hi there! You are cordially invited to attend a meetup being held on Thursday 10 January 2013. Details an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/January 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 10:05, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Sydney)

I think its about time Planet Rugby was "unprotected" and the new article i have written (User:Stemoc/Planet Rugby‎) is moved to that article space, don't you think? It already has over 3000 hits on wikipedia itself...It has been protected for far too long IMO...--Stemoc (talk) 04:37, 16 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! You are cordially invited to an edit-a-thon this Saturday (21 September) in Sydney at the State Library of New South Wales (SLNSW), where you can collaborate with other Wikipedians throughout the day. Andy Carr, a senior librarian at SLNSW will also be helping out. The theme of the edit-a-thon is paralympics sports, but you are free to come along to meet other wiki contributors, and edit other topics.

If you are unable to attend in person, we will also be collaborating online. Details and an attendee list are at Wikipedia:Meetup/Sydney/September 2013. Hope you can make it! John Vandenberg 09:49, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Wikipedians in Sydney)

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stormie, I've closed the DFX discussion as keep but since you were the only !voter - If you would prefer to Merge I have no objections, But I would probably check with the nominator first,
Regards, –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:35, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	<font=3> Wishing you a "Feliz Navidad and a Prospero Año Nuevo" (Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year) Tony the Marine (talk) External audio Jose Feliciano's "Feliz Navidad "

Hi Stormie! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 22:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I saw that you salted Martin Hernandez because it was being recreated as a hoax article. Now that the Martin Hernández article legitimately exists, would you be willing to create the page as:

#REDIRECT [[Martin Hernández]]
{{R from title without diacritics}}

If you want to protect the redirect page to avoid inappropriate content from being put there, that's fine with me. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 22:18, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can I recreate this delete article as a redirect, thanks. According to the producers of the show, her last name was Barrett GoldenRainbow (talk) 02:10, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in more than one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised, that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions, and that you have not been inactive for a three-year period of time). If you remain inactive for a three-year period of time, including the present year you have been inactive, you will need to request reinstatement at WP:RFA. This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 01:30, 1 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please note that TOTP based two-factor authentication is now available for all administrators. In light of the recent compromised accounts, you are encouraged to add this additional layer of security to your account. It may be enabled on your preferences page in the "User profile" tab under the "Basic information" section. For basic instructions on how to enable two-factor authentication, please see the developing help page for additional information. Important: Be sure to record the two-factor authentication key and the single use keys. If you lose your two factor authentication and do not have the keys, it's possible that your account will not be recoverable. Furthermore, you are encouraged to utilize a unique password and two-factor authentication for the email account associated with your Wikimedia account. This measure will assist in safeguarding your account from malicious password resets. Comments, questions, and concerns may be directed to the thread on the administrators' noticeboard. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:33, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Stormie.

A new user group, New Page Reviewer, has been created in a move to greatly improve the standard of new page patrolling. The user right can be granted by any admin at PERM. It is highly recommended that admins look beyond the simple numerical threshold and satisfy themselves that the candidates have the required skills of communication and an advanced knowledge of notability and deletion. Admins are automatically included in this user right.

It is anticipated that this user right will significantly reduce the work load of admins who patrol the performance of the patrollers. However,due to the complexity of the rollout, some rights may have been accorded that may later need to be withdrawn, so some help will still be needed to some extent when discovering wrongly applied deletion tags or inappropriate pages that escape the attention of less experienced reviewers, and above all, hasty and bitey tagging for maintenance. User warnings are available here but very often a friendly custom message works best.

If you have any questions about this user right, don't hesitate to join us at WT:NPR. (Sent to all admins).MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2017). This first issue is being sent out to all administrators, if you wish to keep receiving it please subscribe. Your feedback is welcomed.

Administrator changes

NinjaRobotPirate • Schwede66 • K6ka • Ealdgyth • Ferret • Cyberpower678 • Mz7 • Primefac • Dodger67

Briangotts • JeremyA • BU Rob13

Guideline and policy news

• A discussion to workshop proposals to amend the administrator inactivity policy at Wikipedia talk:Administrators has been in process since late December 2016.
• Wikipedia:Pending changes/Request for Comment 2016 closed with no consensus for implementing Pending changes level 2 with new criteria for use.
• Following an RfC, an activity requirement is now in place for bots and bot operators.

Technical news

• When performing some administrative actions the reason field briefly gave suggestions as text was typed. This change has since been reverted so that issues with the implementation can be addressed. (T34950)
• Following the latest RfC concluding that Pending Changes 2 should not be used on the English Wikipedia, an RfC closed with consensus to remove the options for using it from the page protection interface, a change which has now been made. (T156448)
• The Foundation has announced a new community health initiative to combat harassment. This should bring numerous improvements to tools for admins and CheckUsers in 2017.

Arbitration

• The Arbitration Committee released a response to the Wikimedia Foundation's statement on paid editing and outing.

Obituaries

• JohnCD (John Cameron Deas) passed away on 30 December 2016. John began editing Wikipedia seriously during 2007 and became an administrator in November 2009.

---

13:37, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pro choice. Since you had some involvement with the Pro choice redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. feminist 13:23, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Prochoice. Since you had some involvement with the Prochoice redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. feminist 13:28, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:MagnusCormack.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Sea squirt. Since you had some involvement with the Sea squirt redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Thryduulf (talk) 01:04, 17 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:53, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.

Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.

We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.

For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:PatrickLynch.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:57, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A recently closed Request for Comment (RFC) reached consensus to remove Autopatrolled from the administrator user group. You may, similarly as with Edit Filter Manager, choose to self-assign this permission to yourself. This will be implemented the week of December 13th, but if you wish to self-assign you may do so now. To find out when the change has gone live or if you have any questions please visit the Administrator's Noticeboard. 20:06, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:12, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

Stormie, it is wonderful to see that you are still around. You served as an inspirational factor back then when I began in Wikipedia and helped me a lot along the way. Right now, I have written over 800 articles in Wikipedia and I have to thank people like you for being there for me when I needed your help. Thank you once more. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:07, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hey Tony, it's wonderful to see that you are still around!! Wow, it has been something like 18 years now since I first started being active on Wikipedia - hard to believe!

But it would be a bit of a stretch to say that I am active these days - I still look stuff up on Wikipedia all the time, and jump in to make an edit if I see a mistake or something I can fix, but it has been a long, long time indeed since I've sat down and worked on an article.

Anyway, all the best to you, my friend! Stormie (talk) 05:03, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:53, 15 April 2022 (UTC)

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 08:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:JustinOByrne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:19, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions will be removed if you do not return to the required activity level before the beginning of January 2023.

Inactive administrators are encouraged to engage with the project in earnest rather than to make token edits to avoid loss of administrative permissions. Resources and support for re-engaging with the project are available at Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/administrators. If you do not intend to re-engage with the project in the foreseeable future, please consider voluntarily resigning your administrative permissions by making a request at the bureaucrats' noticeboard.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — JJMC89 bot 00:57, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:HaroldYoung.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Established policy provides for the removal of the administrative permissions of users who have made fewer than 100 edits over a 60-month period. Your administrative permissions have been removed.

Subject to certain time limits and other restrictions, your administrative permissions may be returned upon request at WP:BN.

Thank you for your past contributions to the project. — xaosflux ^Talk 02:23, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Derain CharingCrossBridge.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. grendel|khan 02:53, 5 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:27, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]