To see the archives, click here.

Remember to place new comments at the bottom of the talk page. You can also use the New Section tab at top, which'll set you up beforehand.

I've started the good article review for Saint Lucia at the 2008 Summer Olympics. There don't appear to be many major issues with it, and it should pass relatively easily. If you make suggested changes and I don't pass it right away, it is because I am going out of town tomorrow. --LauraHale (talk) 00:30, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I completed the review at Talk:Netherlands Antilles at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1. It should hopefully take no more than five to ten minutes to see and do what needs fixing. :) --LauraHale (talk) 03:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads-up! I'll look at it right away. :) --Starstriker7^(Talk) 03:50, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the timely response. :) Both should now be GAs. :) --LauraHale (talk) 05:37, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2008 Summer Olympics you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2008 Summer Olympics for things which need to be addressed. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 17:47, 3 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

	Congratulations!
	Congratulations! Saint Kitts and Nevis at the 2008 Summer Olympics that you nominated for GA status has passed! Please continue to make quality contributions to Wikipedia! Puffin Let's talk! 16:25, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:02, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Thermodynamic_equilibrium#Equilibrium_Temperature.3F_.28of_planets._Copied_from_Kepler_11..29

Some of the criticisms at this talkpage are crazy. Do you know any actual scientists that can rebutt the nonsense. 24.79.40.48 (talk) 03:28, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Bolton Landing article should have some reference to sculptor David Smith, who lived and worked there.

Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conscientia (talk • contribs) 07:32, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Richlands High School (North Carolina), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Swimming, Cross country and AVID (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:24, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	It is with grand appreciation that I award you this barnstar for completing Good Article reviews for the December 2011 Good Article Nomination backlog elimination drive Cheers, AstroCog (talk) 22:16, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ICHTHUS

January 2012

In this issue...

• From the Editor
• What are You doing For Lent?
• Fun and Exciting Contest Launched
• Spotlight on WikiProject Catholicism

---

Ichthus is the newsletter of Christianity on Wikipedia • It is published by WikiProject Christianity
For submissions contact the Newsroom • To unsubscribe add yourself to the list here

Hello, I was looking on the Berlin, NH talk page and saw that you are the WikiProject something, something for that page. What do you mean by feedback? Just wondering --Russianamerican1 (talk) 21:52, 5 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that the 2010 population given for the town of Batavia (town), New York is much smaller than that given for the city of Batavia (city), New York, even though the city is located within the town. I assume this means that the town population is only those who are not within a city within the town. But I don't see this made explicit in the definition at Town, and it runs counter to my expectations, but then I'm from a part of the country (Washington state) where towns in this sense are non-existent or at most vestigial units. --Haruo (talk) 23:09, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Vanuatu at the 2008 Summer Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Muna Lee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Starstriker7. You have new messages at Talk:M-14 (Michigan highway)/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Imzadi 1979 → 19:07, 7 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Casliber (talk · contribs) 16:04, 20 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! My name is Dom497 and I have reviewed the Vanuatu at the 2008 Summer Olympics article that you nominated for GA status. Unfortunately, the article is just a tad away from GA status and I have left 2 suggestions on the review page for you to fix. Once the issues are fixed, I will pass the article. You have 7 days to fix the issues or else I will be forced to fail the article. The review page can be found here.--Dom497 (talk) 19:07, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I tried fixing the reference problem but nothing seemed to work...weird! Anyway, I passed the article!--Dom497 (talk) 18:47, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the Bermuda at the 2008 Summer Olympics article that you nominated for GA and unfortunately (again), I have put the article on hold for 7 days in order for improvements to be made. The review can be found here. If you have any questions please leave a message on my talk page.--Dom497 (talk) 00:43, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have passed the article.--Dom497 (talk) 19:20, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to make this short and sweet. Find a few images, remove all the links to articles that don't exist and change the wording of a sentance that I have mentioned here. Once these issues are fixed, I will pass the article. (The article is on hold for 7 days)--Dom497 (talk) 20:45, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a look at the review page as I have added another suggestion.--Dom497 (talk) 18:56, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have reviewed Belize at the 2008 Summer Olympics and placed it on hold for up to seven days with one concern. You can see my review here: Talk:Belize at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1. Canadian Paul 16:06, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the burgers! One of the reasons I wish I still lived in California... anyhow, I'll check out the Belize article now, but I also did the review for Antigua and Barbuda at the 2008 Summer Olympics, so you can check that one out on the talk page as well. Canadian Paul 16:31, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just reviewed Saint Vincent and the Grenadines at the 2008 Summer Olympics. I'll recheck Antigua and Barbuda now. Canadian Paul 13:49, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've just passed Antigua and Barbuda. It seems like I also forgot to mention that I passed Belize as well, so well done and congratulations on both! Canadian Paul 14:11, 18 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've now passed Saint Vincent and the Grenadines as well. Congratulations again. Canadian Paul 19:06, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the British Virgin Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics article and have left a few comments on the review page that need to be addressed. The article will be on hold for 7 days. If you have any questions, feel free to post them on the review page or my talk page.--Dom497 (talk) 13:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have passed the article!--Dom497 (talk) 16:50, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the British Virgin Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics article and have left a few comments on the review page that need to be addressed. The article will be on hold for 7 days. If you have any questions, feel free to post them on the review page or my talk page.--Dom497 (talk) 16:26, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After thoroughly reviewing this article, I have decided to put it on hold at this time. For comments, please click here. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask. Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 22:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on responding so quickly. I went ahead and passed the article since all issues have been addressed. Keep up the good work! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 23:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Starstriker7. Thanks for the support! Even though there is a competition with the good article backlog elimination drive going on, I want to assure you that I am looking to make sure that every article I review meets the good article criteria. Keep up the good work you are doing with the drive as well! Rp0211 ^(talk2me) 23:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Haiti at the 2008 Summer Olympics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington Silva (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:21, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again, I have reviewed the Haiti at the 2008 Summer Olympics that you nominated for GA status. I have put the article on hold for 7 days to allow one improvement to be made on the article. Please see the review page for more details.--Dom497 (talk) 14:39, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have left a comment on the review page--Dom497 (talk) 03:03, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have reviewed the American Samoa at the 2008 Summer Olympics that you nominated for GA status. I have put the article on hold for 7 days to allow one improvement to be made on the article. Please see the review page for more details.--Dom497 (talk) 21:39, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, another reviewer pointed this out for me telling that images should not be used in the section headings. I think it would be in your best interest to remove all images in the section headings. Just a heads up. MoS:Section headings --Dom497 (talk) 20:00, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I actually had not been aware of that. Thanks for the info. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 20:02, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Do you mind just letting me know if the Olympic Wikiproject decided to the include the images when you find out?--Dom497 (talk) 20:21, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I don't mind at all. When I find out, I'll drop you a line on your talk page. You've actually probably had enough experience reviewing these articles to knowledgeably comment on the discussion, should there be one on the topic. --Starstriker7^(Talk) 20:26, 11 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've reviewed your nomination and left a few comments at Talk:Solomon Islands at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1 for you to address. Meanwhile it's on hold.

It's a nice little article. I enjoyed it.

Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 14:29, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I like reading about the participation of these little islands in the Olympics. I've reviewed your article and made a few comments at Talk:Tonga at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1 for you to address. Meanwhile, the article is on hold.

Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 15:42, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm reviewing it at Talk:Barbados at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1

Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 21:54, 15 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Starstriker7!

I believe you are the Wikipedia article creator for the Braidwood, IL Wikipedia article. Is is possible to create a small section about the public library here in town?

Just an idea and a quick question! Thanks for any response!

Sincerely,

Wem621asif (Wem621asif (talk) 22:41, 18 July 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hello! My name is Intoronto1125 and I have reviewed the Puerto Rico at the 2008 Summer Olympics article that you nominated for GA status. Unfortunately, the article is just a tad away from GA status and I have left 3 suggestions on the review page for you to fix. Once the issues are fixed, I will pass the article. You have 7 days to fix the issues or else I will be forced to fail the article. The review page can be found Talk:Puerto Rico at the 2008 Summer Olympics/GA1.-- Intoronto1125TalkContributions 23:36, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Then you should have only partially reverted it. The background history is not needed on each article as there is an article about X in the Summer Olympics, we could "see also" that if need be.Lihaas (talk) 20:24, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The edit in question doesnt deal with them at the 2008 Games (As in the NOC pages a the 2012 games). Can alwasy added to the generic pages instead of waiting for an expansionLihaas (talk) 22:56, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

But thats just it, in that case we dont have to add it to give easier access. Thats not the pt or WP. How about adding a {{see|[[Jamaica at the Summer Olimpics]]}} tag? Putting that in the background section should suffice for easy access, no?

BTW- perhaps we can work together on cleaning out the 02012 pages on monday onwads?Lihaas (talk) 01:15, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:SquattersRiotMarker.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Bkell (talk) 16:02, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WHS Wildcat Rocklin Logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.

If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:34, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--Dom497 (talk)15:24, 22 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

		The Invisible Barnstar
		Your recognition for 2 GA reviews at the last June-July GAN Review Round. Regards. — ΛΧΣ21™ 16:30, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 05:47, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You are reciving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the first message sent out in September, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on this list. The current deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. A third and final message will be sent out during the last week of the clean-up before the deadline. Thank-you.--EdwardsBot

You are receiving this message because you have not added your name to the list of active WikiProject Good Articles participants. Though you may have recived the past two messages sent out in September and October, some users may have had that message archived before coming online to read it and therefore never saw it. If you are deeming yourself inactive with the WikiProject please disregard this message as your name will be moved to an "inactive participant" list at the end of the clean-up. If you are still active with the WikiProject, please be sure to include your name on this list. The deadline to add your name to the list (if you are still active) is November 1, 2012. This will be the last message sent out before the deadline which is in 2 days. Thank-you.--EdwardsBot

Talk:HD_40307#HD_40307_g. -- Green Cardamom (talk) 08:24, 8 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hey- I went to the article talk page and found your comment on saying anything about Beckley as a city. There is a category on the article which, I believe does not apply. Its Populated places established in 1838. In 1838, Beckley, was a piece of paper. I was not until some 10+ years later that the place had streets (mud paths) much less permanent settlers in the city proper. Should we have this category there?Coal town guy (talk) 13:39, 6 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:16, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hey- I believe about 40% of the Bradshaw article was plaagiarism. I confirmed this by finding the site and it was a verbatim copy with zero ference. Additionally, telleng me that it was the "Jewel" of WV with majestic mountains and friendly people, not so encyclopedic.I removed the copied section. HOW this is a start class article, is beyond me. I have also stated the link of the copied material withion the talk page. Could you look at this and tell me HOW or WHY it is a start??? Many thanks, I respecially enjoy editing and creating WV articles.Coal town guy (talk) 13:44, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A 'Request For Comment' for Good Article Nominations is currently being held. We are asking that you please take five to ten minutes to review all seven proposals that will affect Good Article Nominations if approved. Full details of each proposal can be found here. Please comment on each proposal (or as many as you can) here. At this time, Proposal 1, 3, and 5 have received full (or close to) support. If you have questions of anything general (not related to one specif proposal), please leave a message under the General discussion thread. Please note that Proposal 2 has been withdrawn and no further comments are needed. Also, please disregard Proposal 9 as it was never an actual proposal.

Hello! Now, some of you might be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with, the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 00:56, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497). Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed between 12-14 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the initial messages I sent out went to only WikiProject members and users that had over 15 reviews). So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers: Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. Now, one of the most important criteria is that you have at least 15 independent reviews. If you are reading this, you are likely 3 (or less) reviews short, so if you review another couple nominations, you can become a recruiter! If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available". NOTE: If you are interested in becoming a recruiter but do not meet the 15 review requirement, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters and put your status as "Not Available" until you have reviewed enough nominations. Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along. A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk) This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 21:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• As a listed GA participant, you are invited to contribute to a formal Request for Comment on the question of whether Good Articles should be eligible to appear in the Did You Know? slot in future. Please see the proposal on its subpage here, or on the main DYK talk page. To add the discussion to your watchlist, click this link. Thank you in advance. Gilderien Chat|Contributions02:46, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! A GAN Backlog Drive will begin in less than 4 days! In past Backlog Drives, the goal was to reduce the backlog of Good article nominations. In the upcoming drive, another goal will be added - raising as much money as we can for the Wikimedia Foundation. How will this work? Well, its pretty simple. Any user interested in donating can submit a pledge at the Backlog Drive page (linked above). The pledge should mention the amount of money the user is willing to donate per review. For example, if a user pledges 5 cents per review and 100 nominations are reviewed, the total donation amount is $5.00. At the time this message was sent out, two users have submitted pledges for a total of 8 cents per review. All pledges, no matter how much money, are greatly appreciated. Also, in no way is this saying you must make a pledge. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me or leave a message on the Backlog Drive talk page. And remember, there are less than 4 days before the drive starts!--EdwardsBot (talk) 03:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Just a friendly reminder that the GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on December 31, 2013! If you know anyone outside of the WikiProject that may be interested, feel free to invite them to the drive! If you have any questions or want to comment about something regarding the drive, post them here--EdwardsBot (talk) 23:55, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's that time again! Starting on March 1, there will be another GAN Backlog Drive! There will be several changes compared to previous drives:

• This drive will introduce a new component to it; a point system. In a nutshell, older nominations are worth more points than newer nominations. The top 3 participants who have the points will be awarded the Golden, Silver, or Bronze Wikipedia Puzzle Piece Trophy, respectively.
• Unlike the December 2013 Backlog Drive, earning an additional barnstar if you reached your goal has been removed.
• The allowance to have insufficient reviews has been lowered to 2 before being disqualified.
• An exception to the rule that all reviews must be completed before the deadline has been created.

Also, something that I thought I would share with all of you is that we raised $20.88 (USD) for the WMF in the December 2013 drive. It may not sound like a lot but considering that that was raised just because we reviewed articles, I would say that's pretty good! With that success, pledges can be made for the upcoming drive if you wish.

More info regarding the drive and full descriptions regarding the changes to this drive can be found on the the drive page. If you have any questions, feel free to leave a message on the drive talk page.

I look forward to your participation and hope that because of it, some day the backlog will be gone!

--Dom497

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The March 2014 GAN Backlog Drive has begun and will end on April 1, 2014! Sent by Dom497 on behalf of MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HIP 13044 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. StringTheory11 (t • c) 00:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! Hope you've all been having a great summer!

TheQ Editor recently proposed the idea of having another Backlog Drive in either September/October or November/December of this year. For those of you who have participated in the past two drives you know I was the one who organized them, however, come September, this will be my most important year in school so I will not be able to coordinate this drive (if it happens). TheQ Editor has volunteered to be a coordinator for the drive. If any of you would like to co-coordinator, please notify TheQ Editor on his talk page.

If you would be interested in participating in a Backlog Drive sometime before the end of this year, please notify TheQ Editor. Also, make sure to specify what month(s) work best for you.

At the time this message was sent out, the backlog was at 520 nominations. Since May, the backlog has been steadily increasing and we are currently near an all time high. Even though the backlog will not disappear over one drive, this drive can lead to several others which will (hopefully) lead to the day where there is no longer a backlog.

As always, the more participants, the better, and everyone is encouraged to participate!

Sent by Dom497--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:52, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone! We hope you have all been having a great summer!

As we all know, the recent GAN Backlog Drives have not had any big impact on the backlog. Because of that, me (Dom497), Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor have worked on an idea that could possibly finally put a dent into the massive backlog. Now, I will admit, the idea isn't entirely ours as we have took the general idea of the WikiCup and brought it over to WikiProject Good Articles. But anyways, here's what we have in mind:

For all of you that do not know what the WikiCup is, it is an annual competition between several editors to see who can get the most Good Articles, Featured Article's, Did You Know's, etc. Based of this, we propose to you the GA Cup. This competition will only focus on reviewing Good articles.

For more info on the proposal, click here. As a FYI, the proposal page is not what the final product will look like (if you do go ahead with this idea). It will look very similar to WikiCup's page(s).

The discussion for the proposal will take place here. Please let us know if you are interested, have any concerns, things to consider, etc.

--Dom497, Figureskatingfan, and TheQ Editor

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles's 2014-15 GA Cup WikiProject Good articles is holding a new competition, the GA Cup, from October 1, 2014 - March 28, 2015. The Cup will be based on reviewing Good article nominations; for each review, points will be awarded with bonuses for older nominations, longer articles and comprehensive reviews. All participants will start off in one group and the highest scoring participants will go through to the second round. At the moment six rounds are planned, but this may change based on participant numbers. Some of you may ask: what is the purpose for a competition of this type? Currently, there is a backlog of about 500 unreviewed Good article nominations, almost an all time high. It is our hope that we can decrease the backlog in a fun way, through friendly competition. Everyone is welcome to join; new and old editors! Sign-ups will be open until October 15, 2014 so sign-up now! If you have any questions, take a look at the FAQ page and/or contact one of the four judges. Cheers from NickGibson3900, Dom497, TheQ Editor and Figureskatingfan. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)[reply] To receive future GA Cup newsletter, please add your name to our mailing list.

You have been mentioned at Wikipedia:Missing Wikipedians. NickGibson3900 ^Talk 07:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Project-prakash-logo small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Project-prakash-logo small.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I thing your article about this tiny Bloomingburg Villege is really poor missing all the major changes in the recent years, some of what I know is the new village boundaries, new mayor, new trustees, new ZBA, new communities, and a summery of the fight between the Anti and pro Chestnut Ridge development.

Thanks for your contributions to my knowledge overall. 47.23.102.118 (talk) 21:42, 27 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Starstriker7. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An important railway junction town! --Stephanie Do (talk) 09:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WASP-15 and Template:WASP-24 have been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page.

Lincolnshire, Illinois has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 15:31, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]