Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hitogata (Lost media) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Star Manatee! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 09:28, 20 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Star Manatee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hitogata (Lost media), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:01, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:15, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Star Manatee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I personally believe I have learned from the block and will not make such un-constructive edits in the future. If I believe an edit is necessary but may be controversial, in the future, I will visit the talk page and make a request.

Decline reason:

You'll need to request unblock from your original account. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 19:02, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Star Manatee (talk) 18:38, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Jpgordon:, I’: not sure what you mean. That’s not my account; has there been some confusion? If edits made by me are similar to edits made by that account, I promise it is a coincidence. I cannot log into that account and request unblock as it does not belong to me.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Star Manatee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I’m sorry for repeating an unblock request twice but I have realised why I was blocked since last blocked, as it was due to the assumption I was a sockpuppet. I’m not; I have no idea who TotalTruthTeller is besides the fact that they are a banned user who either has a similar IP to me or makes similar edits to those I did before my block.

Decline reason:

Your unblock request is a simple denial that does not outweigh the technical evidence against you. PhilKnight (talk) 21:13, 2 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Star Manatee (talk) 14:16, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Star Manatee (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Star Manatee (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Not provided

• Blocking administrator: not provided.

---

Decline reason: You are not autoblocked, you are blocked directly. 331dot (talk) 16:03, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

To summarise previous requests, i have been blocked i believe as part of a Wikipedia:Autoblock against the user TotalTruthTeller24. My first request was denied because i needed to do it from TruthTeller’s account (an account i do not own), the second because i just denied being TruthTeller instead of giving evidence (i do not know what to give) and the third a ticket which was just called “nonsense”. I’m sorry for having so many, but I’ve used the right template this time; i do honestly want to improve the encyclopedia and I’m sorry I’ve had to waste so much of admin’s time repeatedly requesting unblock using the wrong template for an autoblock against a sockpuppet abuser within my ip range. Star Manatee (talk) 20:06, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) Hi, it does not appear that your block is part of an autoblock (which affects all IP addresses in a range, but usually not logged-in accounts). It is instead a CheckUser block (a user with advanced technical permissions checked the IP data and believes both accounts are indeed connected). The previous template you used appears to be the correct one. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:40, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

That is good to know. But then how can i prove, or at least provide evidence that im not the account TotalTruthTeller24? Star Manatee (talk) 07:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to tell why technical evidence would make it appear you are connected to another account if you are not. 331dot (talk) 16:05, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is just my understanding, i might not have a full understanding due to not being super experienced, but it’s because CheckUser shows i have a similar IP to that person. This is probably because we have a close geographic location. Star Manatee (talk) 16:35, 9 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]