I see you are still developing the article on that assembly of the Synod of Bishops. Have you seen this report of what Pope Francis himself has said of it? Esoglou (talk) 21:20, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Chapeau.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:53, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Stuff You Should Know page, your edit caused a cite error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:15, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chuck Bryant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DeKalb County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 26 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Boston Christmas Tree. Since you had some involvement with the Boston Christmas Tree redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. kelapstick^(bainuu) 13:22, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Red Maple Leaf Award Awarded for your work on Boston Christmas Tree and Ross H. Pentz. Well done! --kelapstick(bainuu) 12:45, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The new QPQ rule was basically saying that all nominations require a QPQ before they can run. Since when the Synod hook runs, under the old rule you would have had 5 credits and would need to start doing them. But basically all you have to do is every time you nominate a DYK, you have to review one. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 17:26, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Looking through your archives, you appear to have 5 credits. The C of E God Save the Queen! (talk) 23:31, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Harrias ^talk 12:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Chuck Bryant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catahoula. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fourteenth Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page José Gómez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Briancua, please take a look at my remarks at Talk:Chuck Bryant. Thanks Tuluqaruk (talk) 08:30, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chuck Bryant is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chuck Bryant (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Cwobeel (talk) 18:33, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Josh Clark (host) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Josh Clark (host) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Cwobeel (talk) 18:44, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Stuff You Should Know Episodes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Seer. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slugger O'Toole. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

HazelAB (talk) 17:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Dedham Maruader.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:49, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Dedham Maruader.jpg. However, there is a concern that the use of the image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. Details of this problem, and which specific criteria that the image may not meet, can be obtained by going to the image description page. If you feel that this image does meet those criteria, please place a note on the image description or talk page explaining why. Do not remove the {{di-fails NFCC}} tag itself.

An administrator will review this file within a few days, and having considered the opinions placed on the image page, may delete it in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion or remove the tag entirely. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:42, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Mother Brook at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:58, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mother Brook, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages WHDH and Supreme Judicial Court. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for doing what you did there; I didn't want to have it break BLP since he wasn't found guilty of everything, now he has that no longer applies. Cheers for picking up there. CharlieTheCabbie|paġna utenti|diskussjoni 18:41, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please see note on your DYK review. Yoninah (talk) 20:55, 8 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Tsarnaev family is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tsarnaev family until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Roscelese (talk ⋅ contribs) 05:21, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article William J. McDonald is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William J. McDonald until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Vycl1994 (talk) 06:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Tamerlan Tsarnaev page, your edit caused a cite error (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you recently split the Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev article. This appears to have been a perfectly fine thing to do, but when you copied the text you didn't provide any sort of attribution. While Wikipedia's content is free, the reuse of it (including on Wikipedia) requires attribution. Failure to do so makes it look like you wrote the text yourself and creates a copyright violation. Don't feel bad - this is a common mistake - but please do read WP:Copying within Wikipedia and follow the proper procedure next time. I already fixed everything for you this time via use of the {{copied}} template, which is probably the best way to document copying in general and especially is useful when a former article ends up as redirect - we don't want to accidentally delete the redirect later, as that too would create a copyright violation, and the template helps prevent this.

Thanks for your understanding and good luck in your future Wikipedia activities. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:39, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Allen3 ^talk 08:33, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Bradford Endicott, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Norfolk County. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 21:15, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you fix whatever this was supposed to be?:

The mill spun imported bales of cotton, and was then out out to be woven.

I'll go fix the 'Electra' that should be 'Electa' which is an even cooler name. :-) Shenme (talk) 00:14, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Mother Brook page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). ( | )

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can . Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from me and the project Victuallers (talk) 20:47, 29 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Did you mean to revert the heading "Reception by individual journalists", or the entire Allen quote? I think you intended the latter, but all you did was revert the subsection heading and left the quote. NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 16:12, 18 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Teblick. Briancua, thanks for creating Stephen F. Schneck!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Wikipedia articles should be based on more than one source. Look for additional reliable sources that will provide more information.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Eddie Blick (talk) 19:32, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a few more comments and some suggested sources on the article's talk page. Eddie Blick (talk) 19:53, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited History of Dedham, Massachusetts, 1793–1999, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Oliver Wendell Holmes. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Abortion, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

EdJohnston (talk) 16:39, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Briancua. Please note the banner at Talk:Planned Parenthood which states that the article is under a WP:1RR restriction. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 16:43, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]