I see that your username is named after the Pokemon Slowking. Do u play Pokémon? If you do, is Slowking your favorite Pokémon_?

As the creating user of this article has contested the PROD (and uploaded all the photos again that were just deleted) I was wondering if you were going to nominate it for deletion? I would support deletion if you did. Just bear in mind however that my experience of this user is that they have a "my way or no way" approach to article creation. It took about four attempts just to get them to leave the cleanup tags in place. -- role^player 17:52, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Moreno Valley City Seal.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:17, 1 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Merda" is a word of portuguese profanity. It's frustrating to find a protected error on wikipedia. You should redirect the article to the "portuguese list" (which exists) and maybe protect it then. Maziotis (talk) 22:21, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks for catching that. Someone created the article as vandalism, so I figured I'd just redirect and protect to deter further vandalism. But you're right; it doesn't need to be protected forever. We didn't have expiration dates for protection back then, or else I would have set one. Fixed and unprotected, so feel free to edit it further if you want. If you run into any other stale protected pages, just let me know. —Slowking Man (talk) 00:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

you're welcome. cheers. Maziotis (talk) 01:22, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays! _David^WS _(contribs) 19:45, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slowking Man/Archive 6! WikiProject United States, an outreach effort supporting development of United States related articles in Wikipedia, has recently been restarted after a long period of inactivity. As a user who has shown an interest in United States related topics we wanted to invite you to join us in developing content relating to the United States. If you are interested please add your Username and area of interest to the members page here. Thank you!!!

--Kumioko (talk) 03:34, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Stanfordmemorialchurch.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 11:45, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 22:20, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:DisputedVote has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Evil IP address (talk) 15:20, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that you will not longer be able to request restoration of the tools because of your prior inactivity. You have until December 30, 2012 to request restoration or else the policy will prevent you from doing so in the future; you would need to seek a new WP:RFA. Until December 30, you can file a request at WP:BN for review by the crats. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 04:22, 3 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(delivered by mabdul 23:49, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Orthopedic. Since you had some involvement with the Orthopedic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. —Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 18:15, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The article Echelon (card game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability offered; none found. The one source cited is to the site of the subject's publisher.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Maproom (talk) 16:45, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Echelon (card game) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Echelon (card game) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Power~enwiki (talk) 04:04, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Second Battle of Adrianople is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Second Battle of Adrianople until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Constantine ✍ 09:06, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on VaporWare (company) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. startTerminal {haha wow talk page | waste_of_space#4023 on discord} 07:12, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been active for such a long time. How are things going with you right now? 2601:246:CF80:1882:55F5:A3ED:4842:5D7D (talk) 22:15, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect John L. Kerry. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 13#John L. Kerry until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Paper Luigi ^{T • C} 16:00, 13 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]