Welcome!

Hello, Slasher-fun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  Karmafist 21:44, 18 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding 787 orders. Thanks a lot for making things clear, hope you don't mind that I undid your early revision, it's just so easy for orders to get counted twice or not enough etc..., best to be clear I always feel. keep up the good work, and I'll try to too!Olyus (talk) 18:25, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your edits to Delta's LAX-GRU service on both airports articles because the source was the Airliners.net forums. Web forums are not considered reliable sources by Wikipedia standards and cannot be used to cite information on Wikipedia articles. If you can find a reliable source for this information, feel free to add it back. -- Hawaiian717 (talk) 18:58, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Podcasts I added had nothing to do with advertising, they were simply ment to be informative. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tofutwitch11 (talk • contribs) 19:05, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I talked to the other person two, but like I said, they were not advertising. You could say that the Microsoft Flight Simulator Article is advertising if you wanted....just be a little practical. I know the rules. Thanks Tofutwitch11 (talk) 20:27, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, if you read the section on wikipedia advertising, I did not brake any rules. I did not favor one podcast over the other. Niether cast requires any fee....I do not know anyone from either of these casts, and had no intent of advertising. Tofutwitch11 (talk) 20:30, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to the Gare vs. Aerogare I found Commons:Category:Gare_des_Invalides - Someone before me had put a pic of the Aerogare in the category before I put some that I had taken myself. Should I move the aerogare pics to a new category? WhisperToMe (talk) 19:45, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Ah, I see - that is a very interesting history! Sometime I could make another section at corporate affairs and describe the Aerogare building. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:52, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that was very nice of you! Best wishes DBaK (talk) 14:01, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Oxygène Airways has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Airline owning only two jets and still waiting for its operating license.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 16:39, 1 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merci pour les corrections.

Pourtant, j'ai pas trouvé les chémas d'AirFrance sur leur site web. Normalement, je préfère utiliser les sources officiels, mais quand je l'ai pas, je fair ce que je peux.

Si vous avez quelques problèmes avec des sources en Russe, Polonais ou Italiens - n'hésitez pas me contacter - je vous aiderai avec plaisir.

Ciao! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gleppe (talk • contribs) 10:52, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Paris has 3 major airports. Paris-Charles-de-Gaulle Paris-Orly and Paris-Beauvais. Even though BVA is 85km North of Pairs it is still part of the Pairs Airport System. The offical name of the airport has Paris in it's logo.

It is just like London-Luton, London-Gatwick, London-Luton, London-Heatorw, London-City & London-Southend. Even though they are closer to London.Jamie2k9 (talk) 22:51, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I have added an exhaustive list for discussing the contentious airports here. Please contribute and provide any suggestions / additions etc. Thanks, jasepl (talk) 16:42, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

However, http://airlineroute.net/2011/02/12/uaco-s11-europe/ states that IAD-CDG and IAD-AMS will be operated by CO. I thnk it should appear on their website soon (i would give it a couple of days to let CO update the flight into their system). Snoozlepet (talk) 03:41, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flight is now bookable on both CO's and UA's website due to commence September 28th. Snoozlepet (talk) 17:10, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the fleet details in the EasyJet article, please note that the fleet table (or indeed any referenced information on a Wikipedia page) must match the quoted reference. The CAA database will be updated in time, usually quite quickly, and then the page can be updated. Otherwise you must provide a new reliable source. Please discuss before changing. Thanks. SempreVolando (talk) 12:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for over-writing your edits to the orders column per Airbus O&D, missed that. The CAA reference though is still the best authoritative fleet source for UK airline articles and is far preferred over the references you provided which are very useful, but nonetheless unofficial. It's also the reason we use the official Irish fleet database as a fleet source for the Ryanair article, despite it being updated far less frequently than the CAA one (which is updated daily on weekdays). I have no problem with including the basic fleet of EasyJet Switzerland in the text split between A319 and A320 types, but have amended the wording to make it clear these aircraft are in addition to the EasyJet fleet as I think the current sentence suggests they are included in the table which is not that case. Also I have reintroduced the reference, which is required. Thanks. SempreVolando (talk) 20:01, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not continue to revert it's name to "Prestwick", every airport that flies to it has it's destination as Glasgow - Prestwick. That's over 25 destinations and would be contested if you tried to edit them. The very fact that you contest it only on the City of Derry Airport is pointy to say the least.

If you revert again you will be in violation of 3RR.

Many thanks

--NorthernCounties (talk) 09:41, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at [:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Glasgow_Prestwick_Airport]. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. NorthernCounties (talk) 11:24, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slasher-fun. You have new messages at talk:Air France accidents and incidents.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mjroots (talk) 11:33, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A third separate editor has added the incident. Please do not remove this yourself, per WP:EW. This is an indication that consensus may be leaning towards it being notable enough for a mention, per WP:AIRCRASH. Mjroots (talk) 10:29, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Air France Flight 7 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Air France Flight 7 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Mûĸĸâĸûĸâĸû _(blah?) 16:46, 13 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know if DL is operating flights between CDG and SEA on March 24th? Couldn't find any DL operated flights after March 24 on Delta's website (only show flights operated by Air France). Snoozlepet (talk) 04:15, 5 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Flights are now on Delta.com....but will this flight be seasonal to replace AF temporarily or is DL flying this route from now on replacing AF for good? Snoozlepet (talk) 15:13, 12 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Slasher-fun! We need a consensus on how to list Continental and United flights in airport articles. When you get a chance, please come comment at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports#CO.2FUA_SOC_2011-11-30. Regards! Snoozlepet (talk) 04:46, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. When you recently edited Emirates destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:33, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

According to official data from Fraport (http://www.fraport.com/content/fraport-ag/en/press_center/news_releases/Fraport-Traffic-Figures-December-Full-Year-2011-FRA-Achieves-New-Passenger-Records.html) the Frankfurt airport had more cargo traffic than Paris CDG on 2011.

As the ACI haven't published the data of 2011 yet the information on World's busiest airports by cargo traffic is not updated yet.

So I have changed the information about cargo traffic in Paris CDG according to the official data from both airports. Vatse (talk) 12:46, 7 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A user insists that china eastern operates flights between Dalian and Paris. After checking their website, it operates under the same flight number same plane but the flight passes thru a domestic hub as per WP:Airports we can't list such flights. I am not sure. Regards! Snoozlepet (talk) 06:26, 16 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Iceland Express was not acquired by WOW air - in the sense that it continues to operate with WOW air as its parent company. It sold all its airline operations to WOW air but the company itself will not remain an airline and you will not see Iceland Express-marked aeroplanes from now on. The company will though continue to exist until it has negotiated with its creditors. Maybe it's not completely clear, given the fact that you can still book flights on the Iceland Express website, but if you can read Icelandic you will be further informed.^[1][2] Stefán Örvarr Sigmundsson (talk) 22:29, 23 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited EasyJet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Barton (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:11, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is a new discussion about the reliability of airlineroute.net that you may be interested in following or participating in. Cheers. AfricaTanz (talk) 05:11, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for finding a better ref for the accident! - Ahunt (talk) 12:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Non-stop flight may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of bicycle sharing systems may have broken the syntax by modifying 25 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Charles de Gaulle Airport may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• from terminals 1 and 2 and goes non-stop to Paris, terminating behind the [[Palais Garnier]]).

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:41, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of airports by IATA code: B may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on .

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | BVA || LFOB || [[Beauvais–Tillé Airport] || [[Beauvais]], France

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:48, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

On the City Night Line you indicated that number of CNL line will close in 2015. I saw some news about the Amsterdam > Kopenhagen on a dutch news site but could not find this information anywhere else. Could you please add your references? Aloxe (talk) 08:17, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I finally took a look at the alleged PDF schedule. Wow. How can anyone be that stupid? Clearly labeled were (1) It only happened between January 2 and January 5, (2) Stop: 1, (3) flight number repeats right above "Paris" in "New York JFK", (4) aircraft: 73H, and (5) it takes 17 hours. Keep watching it closely. If this continues I'll get a knowledgeable admin to protect this article. HkCaGu (talk) 04:02, 21 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Eurovision invitation for Slasher-fun! Hello, I've noticed that you contributed to an article within our project's scope, and would like to formally invite you to join our team of editors at WikiProject Eurovision, a WikiProject dedicated to the Eurovision family of events. If you would like to join, then please add your name to this list and add the project talk page to your watchlist. You may also wish to receive our Project's newsletter; if so then please add your name to the mailing list.

Click the show button to see which contests this project covers.

• ABU Song Festivals
• Bundesvision Song Contest
• Cân i Gymru
• Caribbean Song Festival
• Eurovision Dance Contest
• Eurovision Song Contest
• Eurovision Young Dancers
• Eurovision Young Musicians
• Intervision Song Contest
• Junior Eurovision Song Contest
• OGAE
• OGAE Second Chance Contest
• OGAE Video Contest
• Sopot International Song Festival
• Türkvizyon Song Contest

Thanks and have a nice day! Wes Mouse | ^T@lk 18:49, 11 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Transavia.com destinations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bergerac. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo of Corsair International.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited XL Airways France destinations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Samaná and Puerto Plata. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:55, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Musa Raza. Slasher-fun, thanks for creating WOW air destinations!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. The page has no references and is uncategorised.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Musa Talk  20:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

China Eastern is planning to fly to O'Hare from March 18, 2016 as per http://airlineroute.net/2015/11/11/mu-ord-mar16/ (the source states that the airline has opened reservations for this route) but it keeps getting removed from the destinations table and in the prospective flights section. Can you take a look? Thanks! As long it is properly sourced and that there is a firm start date, it should remain in the table. 97.85.113.113 (talk) 06:01, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Royal Air Maroc destinations, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:29, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits like this one [1], I suggest you to read WP:AIRPORT-CONTENT for the addition of future flights and cancellations of current services. All this information require reliable sources.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 13:46, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jetstreamer: Since airlines don't always make announcements about new and cancelled routes, how do you source that exactly? New routes are available in the booking system of the airline, canceled routes are removed from the booking system of the airlines, but there's no way to reference directly into the airlines booking system. Also regarding this change, as my edit summary said, I just did some clean up: if you believe the terminal change was not accurate, remove it, don't just cancel my clean up of the article. And if you believe you can find sources for some edits, please add them. Mass reverting is not a constructive way of working together. Slasher-fun (talk) 08:49, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not me the one that should find sources for your edits. See WP:BURDEN, and most importantly WP:VERIFY.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's more than clear that all you want to do is to push you preferred version of the matter through warring. I have started a thread regarding your behaviour at WT:AIRPORTS.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:48, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wait @Jetstreamer:, could you remind me who started by mass reverting all my edits, and who refused to help finding linkable sources for actually verifiable information?... Slasher-fun (talk) 20:57, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As I said above, it's you the one that should provide sources for your changes. I see you didn't bother in reading WP:BURDEN. I will continue with this at WT:AIRPORTS.--Jetstreamer ^Talk 20:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jetstreamer: So then, why do you sometimes look for and add a ref, sometimes just ask for a source, and sometimes... well just mass revert? What's your logic? Should we start removing every unsourced statement on WP? Slasher-fun (talk) 21:10, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jetstreamer: I also suggest you to read WP:PRESERVE. Slasher-fun (talk) 21:54, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm Wjkxy! I noticed that you've added new flights at Málaga Airport without citing a reliabe source, WP:AIRPORTS states: "For future destinations, add: "(begins date service begins)" after the destination. Starting dates must be provided with full date including the year and references should be provided." So I kindly ask you to add a source next new flights, to show readers and other editors that what you added is true.
Thank you. Wjkxy (talk) 17:27, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 4 August 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Emirates Flight 521, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. The Rambling Man (talk) 04:44, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I don't really think that orthodromic distance was anywhere in question before AI 173. The only thing that matters is the distance that the flight travels, and not the direct distance between 2 cities. Several examples:

1. In record flights, PIA flight should also not be there, as the direct distance was much smaller than 21000 km.

2. For QF-8 the direct distance is 8,024 miles but in the list, it's listed as 8,578 miles which is the route that it takes.

3. Similarly, for all the flights the distance is slightly more than perpendicular distance, but the actual distance that flight takes is considered. In cases of other flights, this is near the perpendicular distance but in case of AI 173, the actual distance is much more (over 15,100 KM or 2400 KM more than direct distance).

(Sorry for sounding a bit rude) but the word orthodromic was not in the article before yesterday, and it should not be there now either.

Therefore, I have reverted your edit. Thanks!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:History/Non-stop_flight

Anshabhi (talk) 03:24, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Anshabhi:

1. There is no PIA flight in the top-30 list

2. QF8 orthodromic distance is 8578 miles

3. There is no way to determine the exact real distance of a flight, as the flight path changes every day depending on the weather/wind.

All flights are currently listed according to their orthodromic distance, I was just expliciting that.

Please acknowledge those facts so that your changes can be reverted. Don't hesitate to ask if you have any questions.

Slasher-fun (talk) 09:20, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Slasher-fun:, Please see my reply on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Non-stop_flight?markasread=90495332#Flights_and_orthodromic.2Freal_distance

Hi @Slasher-fun:, I see that a lot of Air India entries have been removed from the longest non-stop flight page. I can also see that you have taken great circle distance or orthodromic distance, a theoretical figure, as the standard for measuring flight length. Please provide a reliable source, it could be any individual or organization related to civil aviation and recognized worldwide, that could state in writing that the actual distance covered by a flight does not matter. I have gone through your entries on the talk page and (respectfully) disagree with all of them. We cannot be accounting for world records based on theoretical values. If we must use the great circle distance, then can we also measure the length of certain historical flights like "Solar Impulse" by their orthodromic distance? Please be unbiased and objective in your approach. The removal of AI 173 is uncalled for. Please reconsider your edits and reverts of users who listed AI 173 as the longest flight. 202.142.121.173 (talk) 17:53, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @202.142.121.173:. The page Non-stop flight list the longest commercial flights according to their orthodromic distance. I did not decide that on myself, the Wikipedia community of contributors did. Why? I see two main reasons: the orthodromic distance doesn't change over the time, while the actual distance flown changes at every flight, and people fly to travel from A to B, two places separated by a certain distance, they don't fly to travel a certain actual flown distance. Don't hesitate to add your views on Talk:Non-stop flight as other contributors would gladly explain their own point of view. Slasher-fun (talk) 19:19, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Im FlyingScotsman72 and I undid when you took away the information about the the longest train from Moscow to Pyongyang. I made the decision to undo your edit because that is officially the longest passanger train journey without changing trains. http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/longest-train-journey-without-changing-trains

I can understand why you would not want it to be in the top table because it goes between two countrys BUT, where do I put it if its between two countrys and the longest in the world? Please reply!

P.S Also, one of the points of wikipedia is that people can come on here to find information quickly. By having the Official longest train at the top of the page means people who come to that article for that information will be able to find it quickly! --FlyingScotsman72 (talk) 15:52, 19 October 2016 (UTC) @FlyingScotsman72:Hi! If you look at the russian timetable, this train is actually not a train, but a single car that is carried first with the Moscow-Vladivostok train to Ussuriysk (you may notice those two trains have the same number), then to Tumangan, where it stays 7 hours before finally reaching North Korea with the Tumangan-Pyongyang train. So to me, it does not constitute a non-stop train, but rather a non-stop car through different trains. Slasher-fun (talk) 17:54, 19 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Slasher-fun: Thank you for replying! I already knew that it was only a single carriage which continues to Pyongyang but I still think that it does constitute the title of the longest train in the world, but that is just my opinion. FlyingScotsman72 (talk) 14:48, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@FlyingScotsman72: Well I guess we should bring that up on the article disscussion page, and see what other contributors think about it :) Slasher-fun (talk) 15:42, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Slasher-fun: I agree with you completely! FlyingScotsman72 (talk) 10:39, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Logo wow air.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:17, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slasher-fun. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to TAP Portugal has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Scr★pIron^IV 20:06, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ScrapIronIV: Wow wow wow, "copyrighted material" to talk about the new name of an airline sounds a bit exagerated, don't you think? :) Let's calm down a bit, a tell me exactly what the problem is, instead of reverting every edit within seconds :) Slasher-fun (talk) 07:04, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright issue was with the logo, which was a direct download from the TAP site without a fair use rationale. As for the name change, unless it has been announced and has a citation (not an "example of use on their website") then it should not be changed here. There was an official change of name in 2005, press release, the whole nine yards. Wikipedia cannot make such a name change on our own without a source to counter it. Scr★pIron^IV 13:01, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@ScrapIronIV: The logo was on Commons, I used it from there. If you think it shouldn't be on Commons (the uploader says it is not original enough to be copyrighted, I'm not expert enough to have an opinion about that), you should tell that to the person who uploaded it on Commons. As for a source for the new name, would this post on TAP's Facebook page be enough for you? Slasher-fun (talk) 16:14, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slasher-fun. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:WOW air, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Bearcat (talk) 17:05, 28 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Air corsica logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slasher-fun. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Sundayclose. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Saturday Night Live have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 17:14, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose: Hi! How was that vandalism? The French version was only a pilot, and no other episode has been aired since... Slasher-fun (talk) 12:23, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I reverted too much. Someone else fixed the vandalism. Here is your edit. Look at "== International versions==". You typed the random letters "rance" beside it. Sundayclose (talk) 13:08, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Sundayclose: Woops, didn't see that, looks like a side effect of a Ctrl+F to find "France". Thanks! Slasher-fun (talk) 13:14, 9 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There is a proposal at Wikipedia_talk:Manual_of_Style/France_and_French-related_articles#Naming_of_French_railway_station_articles where your input would be helpful. Colonies Chris (talk) 20:08, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Projet Montréal, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saint-Sulpice. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slasher-fun. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mouvement Montréal, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eurostar Group has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable company. Whole stub relies on a press release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PK650 (talk) 09:01, 2 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/VR-K left/X has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/VR-K right/X has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:08, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:S-line/VR-V right/I/P has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 09:14, 2 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

I've seen a recent edit that you changed some airlines' terminals at Charles de Gaulle Airport. I wondered how you know these terminal changes, for example, Air Canada and Norwegain Air Shuttle moving out of Terminal 1 for 2B and 2D respectively and Air Serbia, Air Tahiti Nui and easyJet also relocating operations from Terminal 2B to 2D. Previously, Air Canada did not publish the move from 1 to 2B on their website and you know they moved to 2B. Can you cite a source to proof you are right? Loveheart547 (talk) 01:04, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Sure: the airport itself did publish the information https://twitter.com/ParisAeroport/status/1647978472420298753 which you can also find on their website https://www.parisaeroport.fr/passagers/les-vols/compagnies-aeriennes Slasher-fun (talk) 07:31, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't move Air Malta as the source said that Air Malta is moving from Terminal 2B to terminal 2D. I can help you fix that. Loveheart547 (talk) 14:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I actually mixed Norwegian and Air Malta, but I already fixed it. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Charles_de_Gaulle_Airport&diff=1150804668&oldid=1150804463

Thanks for your help though! Slasher-fun (talk) 14:57, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, if there is any terminal changes, I encourage you to update the terminal assignment chart. Loveheart547 (talk) 17:18, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to do some updates with the Terminal assignments at CDG. EVA Air has moved from 2E to 1 and Air Algerie has moved from Terminal 1 to 2D. Just giving you a notice as I saw it on Twitter. Loveheart547 (talk) 12:57, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Slasher-fun!

I want to talk about an issue about what happened with the Charles de Gaulle Airport wikipedia page. 4 Star Alliance airlines never moved to CDG Terminal 1 when it reopened in December 2022: Air China, Ethiopian Airlines, Thai Airways International (all currently at Terminal 2E) and Croatia Airlines (was at Terminal 2B before 18 April 2023, but currently at 2D) (although Air China and Thai Airways used Terminal 1 prior to the pandemic but did not plan to move back when it reopened). An anonymous IP removed this information and only made one CDG Star Alliance exception. Should we block this user? I've added a source of which Star Alliance carriers moved back to Terminal 1. Loveheart547 (talk) 21:04, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Wow Air destinations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Wow Air destinations until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Let'srun (talk) 16:40, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your contributions to S21 (Berlin). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:29, 13 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slasher-fun. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:S21 (Berlin), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Slasher-fun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "S21".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hey man im josh (talk) 22:04, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]