(from contributor of the Parton/Holland photo on that page) Given the current vandalism of the BGT page which you've been dealing with, might the process to block unregistered users from editing the page be set up? --Brian Josephson (talk) 09:27, 19 February 2020 (UTC)

Nah. They usually go away after 3 warnings or so. Skyerise (talk) 02:44, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

OK, let's hope it works! I hadn't realised you could do that. --Brian Josephson (talk) 09:18, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

See WikiProject User warnings. The Table of Template tab has all the standardized warning templates. Most have 4 levels. Once they've received a level 4, then you can submit the IP for blocking. Unless the vandalism is coming from multiple IPs, that's usually the way to go... Skyerise (talk) 16:11, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Thanks! --Brian Josephson (talk) 16:26, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Do you wish to add this to the list? I started a RM, but inadvertently left off the dab, and that's what people were focusing on. — kwami (talk) 20:18, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Do you know how to add it properly? And will that automatically put a notice on Talk:Hawaii (island)? Skyerise (talk) 20:30, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

We could do it manually. I didn't want to do so without your permission, in case there were other considerations.

BTW, the response template shortcuts are {{ping}}, {{reply}} (or {{re}}) and {{yo}}. — kwami (talk) 22:04, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

@Kwamikagami:, I went ahead and did it manually. I did add (island) to the requested move after looking at what happened in your move request. Skyerise (talk) 22:06, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

BTW, it would be nice if we could verify the UH motto. The version they have on their website is apparently corrupted. It doesn't match the orthography engraved on the gate out front (it writes apau 'all' as two words). I wrote them but haven't heard back yet.

In the submission of the gate to be a cultural monument, it is transcribed

Maluna aʻe o nā lāhui āpau ke ola ke kānaka

though it doesn't look as if there are any macrons in the actual inscription (though the photo is blurry). But there's a point I don't understand: kānaka is the plural of kanaka, but ke is singular. Can you have a singular article with a plural noun in Hawaiian? Maybe something like nā kānaka 'the peoples', ke kānaka 'the people', ke kanaka 'the person'? Or is there a typo in the submission? — kwami (talk) 22:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

@Kwamikagami: While I have studied some Hawaiian, I'm afraid my knowledge is very basic so I don't really know the answers to these questions. Skyerise (talk) 22:21, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

I don't know any. But my understanding is that ke isn't really equivalent to 'the', that's just the best translation, so who knows how it behaves. It's just that every version of the motto I see has something that seems potentially wrong with it. — kwami (talk) 22:23, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi Skyerise

I am puzzled that you reverted my edit for triviality. Ewan MacColl and Peggy Seeger are major figures in their field and highly notable: "Kilroy was here" is one of their best-known works, and indeed it is not a random title but highly germane to the lyric. Can you enlighten me? Brownturkey (talk) 16:58, 30 July 2020 (UTC)

@Brownturkey:, sure. The issue is that notability is not inherited. The notability of a popular culture referenece does not depend on the notability of its source, but rather on whether the reference itself has been found notable as indicated by being pointed out and discussed in reliable sources. Since you did not provide a source, there was no support for the notability. Many people think it is sufficient to point to the reference itself, but that is not the case. The details of what level of support a cultural references should have can be found at WP:IPCEXAMPLES. Also, the reference should shed light or expand the understanding of the subject of the article the list is in. If it doesn't, then it should be mentioned in the article about the book, song, or other reference itself rather than the article of the thing it refers to. Skyerise (talk) 13:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok thanks that makes sense. I suspect that such a source does exist (there is a vast literature on MacColl, and in the song he used "Kilroy" as a proxy for the invisible manual worker), and if/when I find such a source I will reinstate and cite Brownturkey (talk) 14:29, 4 August 2020 (UTC).

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Users with indefinitely protected user talk pages". Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 19:19, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

I know it was a long time ago, and you might have forgotten all about it, but I think user '82.35.202.156' is back, I've made already made a Sock puppet investigation against them, but I'm afraid I'm kinda new to these kinds of things and might need some help, I'm asking you because I saw your comment saying 'I see through you', which made me smile, but if you could help me in anyway, I'd appreciate it greatly, thank you in advice -- Toby Mitches (talk) 10:06, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Hi there Skyerise! Been missing you on Wikipedia! Someone is editing this page and doesn't really understand the Wikipedia guidelines. We need a Master Editor to come help up sort this out. Right now it is him and me. Please consider helping us bring the standard of the page to neutrality.Red Rose 13 (talk) 00:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for uploading File:AISES logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)