Hello, Sideways713, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck and looking for help, please ask me on my talk page, or come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer.     Have a look at these: Here are a few good links for newcomers: The Five Pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Editing tutorial Picture tutorial How to write a great article Naming conventions Manual of Style When you leave messages, please remember to "sign" your name, by putting ~~~~ (four tilde signs) at the end. This will add your name, and the date and time. You can also do this by clicking the 'sign' button, pictured here. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Ilyushka88  talk  16:34, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Mihály Iglói at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Harrias (talk) 16:32, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On November 29, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mihály Iglói, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 20:51, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Courcelles 12:03, 20 August 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Hello, Sideways713. You have new messages at Rambo's Revenge's talk page.
Message added 11:37, 27 September 2010 (UTC) by Rambo's Revenge (talk). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

We need to get an admin to block this guy, all of his edits have bee vandalism. Philipmj24 (talk) 17:03, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not strictly true, actually. User:Sillyfolkboy managed to track down one (1) edit - under a previous IP - that wasn't vandalism! Sideways713 (talk) 17:09, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Sideways713! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only.  If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:16, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello S. Thanks for catching my edit summary and adding the correct template to the Six Weeks article. I've copied it to my handy dandy sand box for future usage. I appreciate your attention to detail and your time. Thanks again and cheers. MarnetteD | Talk 01:10, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Athletics for a Signpost article scheduled to coincide with this summer's European Athletics Championships. The article about WikiProject Athletics would serve as the beginning of a special "Summer Sports Series", giving you an excellent opportunity to draw attention to the project's efforts and attract new members. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. -Mabeenot (talk) 04:10, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have addressed your comment about sources.--The Devil's Advocate (talk) 15:01, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

nice tag-team:) DMacks (talk) 09:19, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for keeping Stephen Fry's page safe --Vera (talk) 11:27, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for cleaning up my userpage. Vandals are weird. Best, JBL (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

At least this one didn't delete references. Quite the opposite, in fact :) Sideways713 (talk) 20:56, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ha! :) --JBL (talk) 21:58, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you sideways for editing my corpus callosum change. I was trying to prove to my friends that wikipedia is valid. Sorry about the vandilism.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MSP Solai Nadar Memorial Higher Secondary school, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Handball (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This edit of Ryulong[1] and related edit comment is really misguided. The discussion on the talk page had resolved the issue. The fact that Ryulong reverted my edit without even leaving a note on the talk page but instead requesting protection is most improper, nor do I understand why the seconded Ryulong's request for full protection.

User:Incnis Mrsi reported the problem of IP disruption at this thread. I subsequently report the issue here and the page was semi-protected. I then reverted this disruptive IP. The book State Succession to International Responsibility by Patrick Dumberry published in 2007 summarises the current mainstream view on page 151:

"The question whether the break-up of the U.S.S.R. should be regarded as a case of State dissolution or rather a series of secessions is also controversial. The only non-controversial point is that the three Baltic States are regarded not as new States (and not as successor States of the U.S.S.R.) but as identical to the three Baltic States that existed before their 1940 illegal annexation by the U.S.S.R."

I think with that definitive summary we can conclude that the mainstream view is that the Baltic states were not successor states, since the author clearly states there is no controversy in that view, i.e. it is not contested in scholarly literature. Therefore, the Baltic states, which left the Soviet Union three months before it was dissolved, is improperly included as successor states in the inbox. Note that only four republics are listed as predecessors and 12 should be listed as successors, as any RS will show. --Nug (talk) 11:04, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If all reliable sources do indeed support you, it should be easy for you to establish a talk page consensus; as of now, though, despite your claims the issue clearly hasn't been resolved. As for fully protecting the page, if there's an edit war under way involving both IPs and non-IPs then full protection is much more appropriate than semi-protection. Per WP:SEMI, semi-protection is only an appropriate reaction to edit warring "where all parties involved are unregistered or new editors", which clearly isn't the case here. And no, edit warring is not vandalism. Sideways713 (talk) 11:35, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed the discussion has been dormant for nearly two weeks, indicating that no one has been able to refute the sources presented, the disruptive IP was not contributing to the discussion, User:Incnis Mrsi who initially opposed the edit in discussions finally implicitly agreed when he also reverted the IP, thereby showing that consensus has been achieved. The only other opposing editor User:GoodDay was site banned for disruptive behaviour in East European topics, and I wouldn't be surprised if this IP was him. --Nug (talk) 11:42, 29 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping. duffbeerforme (talk) 10:45, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem :) Not sure I'd have tagged it for speedy myself, actually; an {{advert}} template might have been sufficient. Sideways713 (talk) 10:52, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

once again thanks for helping. A little bit goes a long way. The creator of that article is a blocked sockpuppetter [[2]], part of a blatent attempt to use Wikipedia for promotion. Fight spam overtaking. Every little bit counts. duffbeerforme (talk) 11:57, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the link help on JB Taylor (physicist) on Oldbury Grammar School ariticle. Appreciated! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.65.97.14 (talk) 12:34, 1 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching my error at Niels. Cheers,  Yintan  12:13, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for mistaking your intent. It looked to me (after your edit) that the article included Part II in the summary but not Part I, which made me think material was still being arbitrarily removed. But I see I somehow misread the difference page. Once again, my apologies. Thanks for persisting, and for contacting me about it. ubiquity (talk) 15:26, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 16:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have a problem. This peron (IP 76.104.41.137) keeps adding smileys and writing in the plot something like "But she might be back you never know..." I don't want to "roll-back anymore bc the 3RR-rule. So please can you have a look? -(t) Josve05a (c) 22:22, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick and good help! (t) Josve05a (c) 22:35, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted a response to your comment. Kind regards Jono2013 (talk) 18:42, 14 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't write that, I think I got hacked, I will change my password ASAP. Btw, I'm a newcomer, Neebtoothy

Nice work on the Bill Bonthron page.

Sulfurboy (talk) 11:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That was the result of changing the sentence but not taking care of all the loose ends. Thanks for approving it! Daniel Case (talk) 22:56, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK project (nominate) 09:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Template:Did you know nominations/Madden NFL 25 has been updated. czar · · 16:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK project (nominate) 16:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi! I've started a discussion on how best to present results of athletics championships here. Please feel free to contribute to the discussion. SFB 18:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You made contributions to the IAAF Hall of Fame#Other athletes who match the criteria section that has been removed by User:Prolog. The conversation first went to User talk:Prolog and is now moving to Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard#IAAF Hall of Fame where the discussion apparently will now continue. Your participation is invited. Trackinfo (talk) 21:40, 3 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sideways. Does Template:IAAF simple have the same result as Template:IAAF name? If so, we should probably update the name template with the simple code and redirect the now redundant Template:IAAF profile into that too. SFB 12:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not entirely sure what you mean or intend, but at this point I see no advantage to tampering with any of the templates.

IAAF simple and IAAF name are interchangeable to a limited extent: a working link should be produced by the same parameters whichever template is used, but it won't be the same link. Furthermore, IAAF name has a parameter called "name" whereas IAAF simple has one called "text" for the same purpose - confusing the two shouldn't do much damage either way since both templates automatically remove disambiguation from pagenames, but it surely wouldn't do any good.

IAAF profile takes entirely different parameters, and redirecting it to either of the other two would break eighty-odd profile links. Sideways713 (talk) 13:26, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	For your brilliant athletics-related articles :). Keep it up! Ironholds (talk) 19:09, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you participated in Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2010 December 29#T:, some of which I have relisted at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2013 November_18#T:WPTECH. Please come along and share your thoughts .. ;-) John Vandenberg ^(chat) 15:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Sideways713

As a Wikipedian interested in African subjects and specifically Uganda, we thought you might be interested in the following opportunity.

WikiAfrica is looking for a Wikipedian in Community from Uganda to play a pivotal role in its Kumusha Takes Wiki project. This might be a position that you would consider. Or it could be the perfect opportunity for someone you know from this country, please spread the word! For more details, please look at this page: http://www.wikiafrica.net/call_for_wir_en/

If you have any questions about the above, please contact isla on isla [at] wikiafrica [dot] net : Isla Haddow (talk)

There are several redirects for discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_March_27 in which you may be interested. --Jax 0677 (talk) 16:00, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks from the wiki Victuallers (talk) 08:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Was about to close it. All the pages of the socks should be deleted. They should not be removing the speedies in the first place. Enigma^msg 22:05, 8 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are several redirects for discussion at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2014_April_14 in which you may be interested. --Jax 0677 (talk) 03:22, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. I just approved one of your hooks, and while I was doing it, I noticed that a lot of your citations are in all caps. Even if the title is in all caps in the newspaper itself, you should convert it out of all caps per WP:ALLCAPS. Cheers, Sven Manguard Wha? 18:55, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, if I ever read the ALLCAPS guideline I've completely forgotten about it. I converted all the all-caps citations in that article and will try to remember to convert headlines automatically in future. Sideways713 (talk) 19:26, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK project (nominate) 02:03, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for creating Henry Dreyer, Sideways713!

Wikipedia editor Missionedit just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks

To reply, leave a comment on Missionedit's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Hey,

Please go to the talk page of Iran (Talk:Iran) and read the two last sections. If you agree with me about them, just write it down and say you agree.

Thank you so much. Arvid Qasemy (talk) 08:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I created a reference instead as you suggested. The page is for an excellent article on calf raises which goes into more depth about how to do the exercise than is on the wiki page.

Thanks -- Moto4noir (talk) 20:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 16:47, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your sensible comments on ANI. 83.168.23.138 (talk) 01:51, 9 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Herro i spieak the truf about FATHER HO. I kno u west white imperalist lie in you source it false i from da vietnam, you see, and i know they say he name is "Ann Nguyen truc ho" and you know it or else you get the cane you get whoop if you mess up i know cuz i vietnam

Please see note on your nomination. Yoninah (talk) 22:02, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Harrias ^talk 12:01, 29 January 2015 (UTC) Hello, why did you remove my edit??[reply]

Hi

I wondered why you changed my edit I was literally about to put a refrence?

Regards

Ben Benjahdrum (talk) 22:46, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Benjahdrum: According to the article itself, the snake mackerel had acquired at least 6 scientific names by 1860 and was used as a food in Hawaii in the time of Kamehameha I, who died in 1819; accordingly, I felt it was very unlikely the information about it being first seen by Thor Heyerdahl in 1947 was accurate.
A bit of Googling showed me some sources were making the more limited claim that Heyerdahl was the first to see a living snake mackerel; whether that is true, I don't know either, since it seems very unlikely it would be used as food and never seen alive. The source used for the Hawaii claim is available on Google Books, and I verified it does support the claim made; it might not be accurate, I don't know. Sideways713 (talk) 22:56, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are being contacted because you contributed to a recent discussion of MOS:IDENTITY that closed with the recommendation that Wikipedia's policy on transgender individuals be revisited.

Two threads have been opened at the Village Pump:Policy. The first addresses how the Manual of Style should instruct editors to refer to transgender people in articles about themselves (which name, which pronoun, etc.). The second addresses how to instruct editors to refer to transgender people when they are mentioned in passing in other articles. Your participation is welcome. Darkfrog24 (talk) 02:19, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:02, 30 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wishing you a Happy New Year on behalf of WikiProject Athletics! You can read of some of the project's achievements this year at the project talk page (please feel free to add your own thoughts and achievements!). SFB 18:33, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Ben Hedges requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Postcard Cathy (talk) 22:41, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all your hard work on the footers of Olympic Trials. I wanted you to know I'm about half way to building the article on the 1968 US Olympic Trials and will be moving backward in time from there, so you don't need to duplicate my work. But this is the lead up to the Olympics, so I've got bigger fish to fry right now. Trackinfo (talk) 20:35, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Trackinfo: Thanks for the heads-up! When/if I get back to working on the Trials I'll probably do 1924 and 1920 next; for now, I plan to do all US team footers back to 1920 (I'm not sure if it makes any sense to have footers for pre-1920 teams, given how different the system and the role of national teams was in the early Olympics). Sideways713 (talk) 21:08, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

While there are sources, I'm not nearly as well versed on the 1920's, please have at it. I've built Olympic Trials (results) articles from 2000 backwards to 1972 and I did 1948, so my goal is to fill in the gap. Even to 1948 includes people I've met and have even competed with, so it is much more familiar territory. Trackinfo (talk) 21:57, 17 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 22 July 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Sydney McLaughlin, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 16-year-old hurdler Sydney McLaughlin is the youngest athlete to qualify for the United States Olympic track and field team since 1980? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Sydney McLaughlin. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Sydney McLaughlin), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 03:32, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On 23 July 2016, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Kendra Harrison, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. The Rambling Man (talk) 21:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You may be interested in participating in the African Destubathon which starts on October 15. Africa currently has over 37,000 stubs and badly needs a quality improvement editathon/contest to flesh out basic stubs. There are proposed substantial prizes to give to editors who do the most articles, and planned smaller prizes for doing to most destubs for each of the 53 African countries, so should be enjoyable! So it would be a good chance to win something for improving stubs on African sportspeople, including footballers, athletes, Olympians and Paralympians etc, particularly female ones, but also male. Even if contests aren't your thing we would be grateful if you could consider destubbing a few African articles during the drive to help the cause and help reduce the massive 37,000 + stub count, of which many are rated high importance (think Regions of countries etc). If you're interested in competing or just loosely contributing a few expanded articles on African Paralympians, Olympians and committees etc, please add your name to the Contestants/participants section. Diversity of work from a lot of people will make this that bit more special. Thanks. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:14, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sideways713. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from doing edits such as this. WP:NCIH is the policy that covers this. – Sabbatino (talk) 07:12, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was not familiar with that guideline, and will refrain from further edits of that type; though I would note that a) my edit was consistent with how the name appeared in the infobox and b) NCIH's North American clause only speaks of player names. Sideways713 (talk) 13:34, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Didn't notice that, but no diacritics policy was always used for every single person on North American ice hockey article. I suppose other teams' staff was excluded for some reason or it just was a silly mistake. – Sabbatino (talk) 16:28, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It was just worded that way cause the fights usually resulted from player names. But yes we intended it for any person name. Its really just meant to stop edit wars. Really the best course of action for most people is just leave as you find. But a few people on either side of the debate always end up edit warring so we had to make the guidance to stop the fights. -DJSasso (talk) 16:48, 6 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

We now delete or hide diacritics on NHL franchise articles. Such compromise was required to help end the Diacritics Wars of yesteryear :) GoodDay (talk) 07:10, 8 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

		The Redirect Barnstar
		Your diligent work in the area of redirect categorization and improvement is duly recognized and greatly appreciated. You are truly one of the unsung heroes of Wikipedia, and we hope you continue to enjoy your improvement of this awesome encyclopedia! Thank you for your very useful comment about diacritic-stripping for Finnish and Estonian redirects.[3] Deryck C. 12:07, 18 January 2017 (UTC) Deryck C. 12:07, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Sideways713. I noticed your submission to the Tom Cranston AfD. In an effort to finally resolve the never-ending and annoying GNG v SSG issue, I've proposed a revision of the NSPORTS introduction. Given your interest, you're invited to take part. Thank you. Jack | ^{talk page} 06:20, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sideways713. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sideways713. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:12, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]