• /Archive 1 (June 2005 - December 2005)
• /Archive 2 (December 2005 - February 2006)
• /Archive 3 (February 2006 - April 2006)
• /Archive 4 (April 2006 - June 2006)
• /Archive 5 (June 2006 - May 2007)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Holtzappel, by Sgeureka (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Holtzappel is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Holtzappel, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:14, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Eppelman, by Sgeureka (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Eppelman is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Eppelman, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 19:15, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to check: User:Danny Horn@enwiki, User:Gorge He@enwiki, and zh:User:George He@zhwiki G.He 21:54, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(And delete User:George He (I did register that account on enwiki, but the vandal created the userpage) and block User:Gorge He) G.He 22:01, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shanel, this is Jack Phoenix of Wikia. We talked a bit over at #wikia-antivandalism. :)

Anyway, here are the troll accounts with appropriate links:

Jack Phoenix on French Wikipedia - My userpage history on French Wikipedia - block log for "Jack Phoenix" (blocked indefinitely

Jack Phoenix on English Wikipedia - My userpage history on English Wikipedia - block log for "Jack Phoenix" (blocked indefinitely)

Jack Phoenix on Finnish Wikipedia - My userpage history on Finnish Wikipedia - block log for "Jack Phoenix" (blocked indefinitely)

Roosaa kirottu on Finnish Wikipedia (not blocked yet)

Thanks for your time and it was very nice to meet you. :) --Roosa 22:05, 22 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As of now, 14:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC), one imposter more:

Fennix on Finnish Wikipedia - My userpage history on Finnish Wikipedia - not yet blocked

The name is an intentional misspelling of my Finnish nickname I use outside Wikipedia and Wikia . I'm guessing this is yet another sockpuppet...and similiar intentional misspellings of that nick have appeared on Wikia too. Thanks for your time to clean up this mess, Shanel. :) --Roosa 14:16, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Have you made any arrangements to depopulate the categories you deleted, or are you going to leave that to the rest of us? Thanks – Gurch 17:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you deleted Category:Furry Wikipedians, and removed it from people's userpages... However, I can't find a deletion discussion for this category, in CFD, MFD, or anywhere else... Care to point me to it? Thanks, Bushytails 19:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Finally found one, had to look way back... in November 2006, this category was listed for deletion, but the result was a definite keep. Has there been anything newer? Thanks again, Bushytails 19:48, 25 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

While I may do that, the first step of a deletion review is, of course, to talk to the person who deleted it.  :)

By some quick estimating and searching, there's probably well over a thousand wikipedia articles (many with associated media) on topics releated to furry fandom, mentioning furs, or of significant interest to the furry community, and as it is a major subculture, this is to be expected. Like the other subcategories of Category:Wikipedians, Category:Furry Wikipedians could be used to find editors with similar interests to help with an article, resolve disputes, and so forth, and complies with all guidelines I can find for classifying wikipedians, such as not being inflammatory, divisive, or intended to promote politics.

You suggest the use of a userbox instead... By that logic, the entire Category:Wikipedians structure is unneeded, and should instead be replaced by about a million (or so) userboxes, that every user who wished to categorize themselves would need to add to their userpage... And not being too much of a fan of userboxes myself (note my page has nothing other than babel boxes), I hope you'll agree with me that this would be a bad thing. (Also note the category existed long before the furry userbox, possibly before widespread use of userboxes... and many people were in the category that do not use userboxes). Especially with userboxes being phased out, proper categories are neccessary. (As a side-note, there were a couple hundred more users in the category before the big userbox deletions, as most people had their box deleted rather than replaced with a userspace one.)

Being popular for vandalism and attacks is no reason to delete something, and is something most long-term wikipedians have come to expect... And vandalism of a category, unlike vandalism of a userbox, has very little impact and almost no visibility, while a vandalized userbox will appear on hundreds of pages at once.

And then, of course, the result of a deletion discussion only 6 months ago was "keep", and in several other deletion discussions, other wikipedian categories were deleted with their users being moved to Category:Furry Wikipedians from other more narrowly-defined categories, implying the desirability of that one.

Short version: It helps further the project, doesn't hurt the project, complies with all policies, has been repeatedly voted to be kept, and probably shouldn't be deleted.  :) Thanks, Bushytails 21:33, 25 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Heh, you think goons doing mindless wiki-vandalism is a new problem? They attack just about everything they dislike, both online and offline... I remember when I was doing some advertising for a furry-oriented meeting... we put up glossy 14x19" mini-posters advertising it... so, of course, the local goons pulled them down and put up their own anti-furry posters... I just wish I remembered to get photos of them dressed up as fake ninjas while they were swapping posters. Some fursuits may look odd, but not nearly as laughable as a bunch of slightly drunk goons with black sweatshirts wrapped around their heads.  :)

Ah, those were the days... I got around a hundred death threats over that. But, that's a bit off-topic... I'll just assume that most furs who state their furryness in public are thick-skinned enough to revert their userpages slightly more often than other users... And removing one source of people to complain about will just cause them to find another. I think goons have some disease that will cause them to instantly die if they can't find someone to bash.  :)

I've found categories useful... For example, when I started the metalworking wikiproject, I looked through them to see if I could find people with similar interests to help edit pages. (sadly, I didn't find any useful categories, but that shows how much more popular furry fandom is than mechanical engineering, and that we need more categories for engineers!). With furry pages, due to the relatively high volume of sneaky vandalism, a category of topic-aware editors is always helpful... And, of course, as I said before, it's been voted "keep" at least a couple times.

Most people probably didn't notice because it was included with the userbox, and not many people check the list of categories at the bottom of their user page to see if one of them is suddenly missing... for the others, there's been so many non-policy-approved deletions lately that apathy runs high... and most people are probably scared to argue with a potentially rogue steward, anyway.

"Too much work" isn't a very good answer... I bet it'd take less than 5 minutes. I could do it in 15, but I don't have the few extra bits set on the server that lets me see all the undo links at once and skip the verification step. (Hell... my allergies are too bad right now to get any actual work done... if you undelete the category, I'll start re-adding people to it. I haven't been on wikipedia much the last year, need to boost my edit count anyway!  :) Bushytails 00:40, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I too only discovered this had gone when you (Shanel) removed the category from my userpage, and like Bushytails — for pretty much the exact reasons he set out above — I can't say I'm all that happy about it. So, pace your comment in User talk:Bushytails, he was not the only person who noticed! Does it really matter? No, not really. But it's mildly disappointing to have a category zapped with no prior warning after a fairly recent vote to keep. I won't make a huge song and dance about it, but I would have preferred it not to have been done. Loganberry (Talk) 00:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will. One of the arguments given was that it's a way for trolls to find targets, but they could just as easily do the same with the list of users including the template. Besides, since when did we give in to trolls? The articles in Category:Furry are similarly vandalized, but I don't think anyone would see that as a reason to remove that category. GreenReaper 17:10, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Was up with that bot? Did buick really hack it? --Whsitchy 21:34, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

As album covers are, by their very definition, not replaceable by a free alternative, they inherently fall under the "no free alternative possible" criterion for a fair use justification. Period. Bearcat 05:17, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Shanel! You've got mail! Tell me if you need any more information :)

I've noted that you've subjectively speedily deleted quite a few Wikipedian categories outside of the existing process at WP:UCFD.

Rather than just list them all at WP:DRV, I'd like to ask you to revert your deletion and restore the categories. And then feel free to nominate any that you have issues with at WP:UCFD. - jc37 23:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

While it would have been preferable that these were deleted within UCFD, I have to agree that most if not all the deleted categories were unencyclopedic and personally can't fault an IAR deletion of them. I wouldn't be surprized if DRV felt the same way. Of course, if Shanel wants to undelete them and bring them to UCFD that's fine too. VegaDark (talk) 23:59, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since you've had a few edits since I've posted this, I'll presume that you are choosing to not respond (which is your perogative, in this case, I suppose). Since they were speedy deletions, if we consider the concerns above, we have more than just 2 concerned editors, which is enough per the speedy deletions section of WP:CFD for a normal listing. So I'm going to go ahead and revert them all "en masse", and list them at WP:UCFD for discussion. Personally, I think more than a few will likely still be deleted for the reasons you gave, but I think it's probably better to not "pick and choose" in this case. - jc37 08:32, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Unbreakmyheart.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

--Roosa 17:29, 14 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shanel. You're not on IRC, so I thought I'd leave this message here. In the future, I would not invite non-admins into the admins channel, especially if said user randomly appeared from nowhere after four months. That is a problem waiting to happen. (messedrocker • talk) 22:10, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am blocked from the irc channel by a stewart called Effeit Sanders, whom i have accused in my eyes very proving, of bias i would like to talk to some other stewards about his actions i feel that i am being abused by his higher power here i want my case be herd by his pears how can i do that?--זלמן לייב 19:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand - first you reverted someone's removal of personal information, then you locked the page, saying "please stop adding in personal information". I don't get it - are you pro- or anti-personal information on this page? Korny O'Near 03:01, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, first off, this person was, or at least claimed to be, an employee of Universal Records, the Shop Boyz record label; this isn't allowed at Wikipedia and is protected by a policy. Also, even when I tried to explain to this user why their edits were reverted, while, at the same time, citing policies, they refused to comply and continued to make the flawed edits. It's hard to assume good faith when someone doesn't listen. ♣ Klptyzm ^{Chat wit' me § Contributions} ♣ 19:56, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shanel has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as Shanel's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Shanel! A record of your Day will always be kept here. Love, Phaedriel 01:45, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Shanel's day. You deserve it, my love. :) —{admin} Pathoschild 03:43:25, 09 July 2007 (UTC)

YAY! Happy Shanel's day! Giggy _U^CP 06:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Shanel Day Too. Take Care:) King Lopez ^Contribs 07:18, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You get a Wikipedia cake. —Benn Newman 13:00, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, Shanel, for granting my request for temp sysop/admin permissions.  I can't tell you enought how wonderful it felt to look at the Main page of the TPI Wikipedia and see those extra tabs there and on the TPI Wiktionary as well!!

Now to roll up my sleeves and really get to work on those two Wikis! Many thanks again, Shanel.  K. Kellogg-Smith 01:23, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For You Shanel. King Lopez ^Contribs 09:32, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am concern why this user never replies to messages left on her talk page. Does she talk? King Lopez ^Contribs 10:01, 31 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please contribue to the talk page before simply making changes. There is a discussion already about the future tag. Thanks. (edit forgot to sign name sorry) Jstanierm 12:26, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shanel, the above editor is not going with consensus, and keeps adding the tag. Regards, -- Jeff3000 13:52, 21 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, I haden't realized that he wanted to keep it seperatly, otherwise I wouldn't have moved it. If you really wanted to get rid of the mention of the name, you could probably oversight the pagemove I did so that it never showed up in the history (if thats possible :p) Cheers! — Moe ε 13:09, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Shanel,

Just a note to say that, for a presentation at Wikimania today, I demonstrated how to remove noise and normalise audio using Audacity using your reading of Anthem for Doomed Youth. Just so you know. :)

Cheers, Daveydweeb (^chat/_review!) 07:26, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grazie diecimila! :D --Tooby 10:15, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

And, happy belated birthday, too. M.^(er) 03:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I second. :) @pple complain 17:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Early, or very belated indeed. It's in November. ;) —{admin} Pathoschild 01:15:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

to see you drop by KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 03:45, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I knew when I saw Alfie with sticky fur, chewing floor gum, that I had to drop by. :O--§hanel 07:10, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mmmm well you were a little late, where were you when this was going on? Mm hmm. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 07:17, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair nuff. Anyhow, somebody's birthday is coming up, is it not? KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 04:05, 6 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, there.

I just wanted to know if you're able to take a picture of the Coptic Orthodox Church Center in Mississauga OR St. Mark's Coptic Orthodox Church in Toronto. You can find out the street address online (the links to those websites are on the image pages). The current images are, unfortunately, copyrighted, as I was the one who uploaded them.

The current (copyrighted) images may get deleted, so if they do, then I'll need to replace them.

I need you or somebody else to take a picture, release its copyright, and upload it onto Wikipedia. I HAVE contacted others to notify them also, so if there are more than one pictures, that's OK (I can still make an article on them). I want these images to be used for, specifically, the article "Coptic Orthodox Church in Canada". The image pages are, again:

• Toronto: Image:St Mark's CopticChurch--TO.jpg
• Mississauga: Image:Canadian Coptic Center.jpg

• ~ Troy 22:34, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rich Fields: Its a barrage of prizes!!!!

• Its a cake! From a bakery in Queens, this cake was meant just for you.
  Its a cake! From a bakery in Queens, this cake was meant just for you.
• 
  Its a bottle of foreign beer! Made by some foreign company, this beer was brought to you to celebrate your birthday!
• 
  Two tickets from me, Rich Fields, as you cruise to the Price Is Right studio in your...
• 
  ...BRAND NEW MASERATI!!! From the Maserati company, this Coupe will have you driving in style.

Rich: Happy birthday Shanel.

Drew: What do you bid?^Mitch32^contribs 20:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Just kidding! Your talk page looked lonely, so I figured I'd liven it up. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 06:39, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

*huggles* Huggle (talk) 11:03, 17 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you have participated Wikipedia:Featured sound candidates in the past. There are now two candidates and the project appears to be abandoned. If you could look at the candidates and vote it would be appreciated. Zginder ^{(talk) (Contrib)} 18:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for signing up for the Wikimania Toronto organizing team, we're glad to have you on. And special thanks for recruiting Cbrown and Az1568, that's especially appreciated. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:09, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, previously you expressed interest in participating in the Wikipedia:Admin coaching project. We are currently conducting a reconfirmation drive to give coaches the opportunity to update their information and capacity to participate in the project. Please visit Wikipedia:Admin coaching/Status to update your status and move your entry to the Active list. Also, please remember to update your capacity (5th table variable) in the form of a fraction (eg. 2/3 means you are currently coaching 2 students, and could accept 1 more student). Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 09:31, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shanel,

There will be a WMC meeting at 8pm (EST) tonight. Hope you can make it.

Also, I have placed a cross-wiki checkuser request on meta checkuser page I hope you can help me vertify whether these 2 IPs and a registered user are sockpuppets. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 17:36, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there. :) Just letting you know that Ariel is back on WP and has even logged onto IRC. Come on over to her room! GlassCobra 21:55, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shanel, I have a problem. I found that the Category:Italian Wikipedians contains itself as a subcategory. This generates problems when we click on the "+" expanding the category. Can you do something? Or maybe, do you know somebody who can help? Thank you,
--Marco Perticarini (talk) 20:50, 10 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:Nurseryschoolme.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 02:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 02:54, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Shanel. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day!-- §hep • ¡Talk to me! 22:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it's been a while now. How have things been with you? Titoxd^{(?!? - cool stuff)} 23:26, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shanel has been identified as an Awesome Wikipedian, and therefore, I've officially declared today as Shanel's day! For being such a beautiful person and great Wikipedian, enjoy being the Star of the day, dear Shanel! Peace, Rlevse ~ A record of your Day will always be kept here.

For a userbox you can add to your userbox page, see User:Rlevse/Today/Happy Me Day! and my own userpage for a sample of how to use it. — Rlevse • Talk • 02:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Happy Shannie Day! <3 —{admin} Pathoschild 10:05:22, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Template:Sockadmit has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. DisturbedNerd999 (Delete!) 19:43, 1 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Shanel,

Thank you for blocking the user I reported. I thought his username may present trouble.

All the best
Limideen 12:15, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shanel! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Xavier Guillemot - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:57, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure if you are on the mailing list for Wikimedia Canada, so that's why I left you this message. You're previously involved in bid process for hosting Wikimania in Toronto. Right now we're forming a bid team for Wikimania in 2011. Would you be interested? OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 17:17, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was looking through the coaches at Wikipedia:Admin_coaching/Status and saw that there are a lot under "reconfirmation".

Could you let me know if you are still interesting in being involved with Admin Coaching, or if you would prefer to have your name removed from the "reconfirmation" list. If you want to be involved, could you please move your entry from "Reconfirmation" to "Active" and indicate how many students you would be willing to have (obviously, if you are actively coaching at the moment, then please indicate this!)

If I do not hear from you within a week, I will assume that you would like to have your name removed from the list of coaches.

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 07:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I recently created a village pump proposal and request for bot approval for a bot that automatically updates editcounts for use in userboxes, templates and such. We are currently discussing the benefits and drawbacks of such a bot, as well as various different ways in which it could be implemented. Since you are a member of WikiProject edit counter I thought you may be interested in participating, your input at the discussions would be very welcome. - EdoDodo ^talk 08:00, 13 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated User:Shanel/Vandalize for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Shanel/Vandalize. Cunard (talk) 01:15, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Shanel/Sandbox, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Shanel/Sandbox and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Shanel/Sandbox during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. :| TelCoNaSpVe :| 05:46, 10 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded and added refs to User:Shanel/Sandbox2, moved it to the mainspace at Michel Maxwell Philip, and nominated it at T:TDYK. Cunard (talk) 05:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The DYK project (nominate) 18:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 06:45, 1 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next month. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 03:29, 1 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions will be removed pending your return if you do not return to activity within the next several days. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated should this occur, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. MadmanBot (talk) 17:25, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative permissions of users who have been inactive for one year (i.e. administrators who have not made any edits or logged actions in over one year). As a result of this discussion, your administrative permissions have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these permissions reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e. as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. Regards, — Moe Epsilon 15:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know you and I share same birthday (see here)! --Tito Dutta (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a recent change to the administrator policy that alters what you were told at the time of your desysopping. The effect of the change is that if you are inactive for a continuous three year period, you will be unable to request return of the administrative user right. This includes inactive time prior to your desysopping if you were desysopped for inactivity and inactive time prior to the change in policy. Inactivity is defined as the absence of edits or logged actions. Until such time as you have been inactive for three years, you may request return of the tools at the bureaucrats' noticeboard. After you have been inactive for three years, you may seek return of the tools only through WP:RFA. Thank you. MBisanz ^talk 00:20, 4 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Benoit Rochon (talk) 00:05, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shanel. I see you deleted Tim Koch; could you please restore it to User:Launchballer/Tim Koch because he is a member of Heartist (see User:Launchballer/Heartist) and there are a number of incoming links? I'm undecided what to write, whether an article, redirect or disambiguation page, but something is necessary. Thank you.--Launchballer 10:34, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, a proposal regarding pre-adminship review has been raised at Village pump by Anna Frodesiak. Your comments here is very much appreciated. Many thanks. Jim Carter through MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:46, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, Shanel. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from the Wikipedia Birthday Committee! Have a great day! Vatsan34 (talk) 18:14, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yahooom. Since you had some involvement with the Yahooom redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 21:47, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Yahoo.con. Since you had some involvement with the Yahoo.con redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 22:09, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:05, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shanel. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shanel. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome

Ten years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:02, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good day, this message is to inform you that Wikimedia Canada has created a new mailing list operated by Mailman. This mailing list is for all discussions related to the Wikimedia movement in Canada, in both English and French. Announcements from Wikimedia Canada will always be bilingual, but you are welcomed to discuss in any language of your choice. The old google group will be abandoned. To join this mailing list, please go to [1]. To send messages to the list, write to general(at)discussions.wikimedia.ca. Also, please forward this message to anybody who may be interested. Thank you and do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. JP Béland (WMCA) (talk) 13:38, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'd just like to thank you for your undoing of vandalism some seventeen years ago and would also like to know if you've ever watched it since that time. ArguaBILL (talk) 16:36, 11 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]