Hi and welcome to wikipedia. I realise that you think you are helping by updating the Dekel Keinan article. However, until BFC officially announce him as a Blackpool player, then the article needs to remain as it is. There is still nothing on the BFC website about Keinan signing. He is supposedly away with Israel at the moment and meant to be back in Blackpool on Thursday when presumably he will be announced. But please don't change it until an announcement is made as articles need to be sourced. Thanks and have fun.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 20:41, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi tangerines i think you will find that Sky sports news has under the transfers thing under blackpool players in, it clearly states that D Keinan has signed for us on a free.

I know that, I have seen it. However, wikipedia works on verifiability, and until Blackpool F.C. announce him as having signed then the article needs to remain the same. I would ask you again to wait until BFC announce him as having signed.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 21:11, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok as you wish tangerines.

It is just how wikipedia works, and not how I wish! :) I would suggest having a look round wikipedia and have a look at all the BFC articles too. Have fun on here and if you need any help let me know.--♦Tangerines♦·Talk 21:26, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Vital Football has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://associationfootball.wikia.com/wiki/Vital_Football. If the external link you inserted or changed was to an external Wiki, then please note that these links should generally not be included (see 'links to avoid' #12).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 11:31, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can't see where I accused you of vandalism - I may have charged an unregistered user with this, but your edit was reverted by User:Struway2. Fans forums are not accepted as sources on Wikipedia no matter how well respected the poster may be. When there is an official announcement of a change of payer's club only then can it be included in the player's article. Any earlier is little better than conjecture based on gossip and rumours. Wikipedia is about fact, Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 18:20, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - sorry I know nothing of it because you have me confused with someone. My editing on the Blackpool F.C. article are based only on disambs fixs:

[1] -cheers Abani79 (talk) 12:34, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted this edit because it was a mess. Please use punctuation and standard English capitalisation. This edit was not up to the standard of an encyclopaedia. Thank you. Ground Zero | t 11:02, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:43, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why be in such a hurry to add "news" - wait until it's properly reported, preferably by the club itself or a reliable source, then edit the article with proper citations. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 21:33, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blackpool are welcome to him - you'll get half a dozen good games then he'll go off the boil. This is of course purely my POV. Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 21:34, 31 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

		The Modest Barnstar
		Thanks for your recent contributions! Mike Restivo (talk) 05:28, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I noticed that you attempted to file a deletion discussion (on the article Goop) but did not complete the process. Please note that, when listing an article for deletion, a discussion page needs to be made for other users to discuss whether to keep or delete the article. This is typically done by following the steps listed here. Note that if you are editing as an unregistered user, you cannot create a discussion page. Please consider registering an account or asking another user to help you complete the process at Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion. Thank you. GiantSnowman 14:52, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You missed out two steps - you didn't add the AfD to today's log, and neither did you notify the article creator. The former is vital; the latter a mere courtesy. I had done both on your behalf. Regards, GiantSnowman 15:07, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seasider91. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mercury (film).
Message added 19:05, 13 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:07, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Seasider91 - you are invited to offer your opinion at User_talk:NewzealanderA/Misha_B#User_Consensus_Request regarding X Factor contestant Misha B - User:NewzealanderA/Misha_B. Thank you for your time!-- NewzealanderA (talk) 23:03, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seasider91. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brown people (2nd nomination).
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

FonsScientiae (talk) 14:00, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

With reference to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chohung Bank FC I have now re-written:

• Chohung Bank FC
• Cheil Industries FC
• Pyongyang FC

I also make reference in my comments to the status of the Korean National Football Championship, predecessor to the current FA Cup, with reference to the Korean Football Association website. It is a shame that this page which lists the National Football Championship winners and runners-up is not in English.

• 조흥은행 = Chohung Bank FC
• 제일모직 = Cheil Industries FC

League Octopus (League Octopus 06:22, 20 July 2012 (UTC))[reply]

You might want to a) revisit this AfD and b) lose the attitude. Regards, GiantSnowman 17:24, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As a film's notability is not at all dependent upon a film's stars having notability themselves, specially for a non-English pre-internet film French film, perhaps you might reconsider your comment at the AFD? Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:09, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

	For supporting me..
	Thanks a lot for making my stand clear about the Emirates Environmental Group issue! Gautham Manoj Pillai (talk) 13:47, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

I have noticed you have recently deleted the Young Engineers created by one of my adoptees, who also requested it. I was wondering if there was any way I could get a copy for the person of checking for copyright violations. RexRowan told me on his website that the Young Engineers charity reported him to the police for copyright violation, as you can see at User talk:RexRowan. Thanks,  Adam Mugliston  Talk  17:24, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You should request this of User:JamesBWatson, the administrator who actually did the deletion. LadyofShalott 17:35, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't notice it wasn't Seasider91 who closed the deletion. Sorry. It seems like RexRowan does not want resolving this anyway, per the strong reply on his talk page most recently.  Adam Mugliston  Talk  17:41, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seasider91. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthropophilia in animals.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

LadyofShalott 17:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lee Trundle‎, you may be blocked from editing. Rettetast (talk) 22:44, 11 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bit OTT eh? That only happened once, take a chill pill. Seasider91 (talk) 19:32, 12 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

To be perfectly clear. There is no tolerance for blatant vandalism to a BLP and especially from established users since they know better. You are not entitled to any warnings. I had the mouse on the block button, but decided to let you off with a warning...this time. Rettetast (talk) 15:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for being leanient this time Seasider91 (talk) 16:14, 13 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/puzzle pyramid, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:04, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Seasider91. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled puzzle pyramid.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note, however, that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/puzzle pyramid}}, paste it in the edit box at , click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:14, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seasider91. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthropocloud.
Message added 13:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 13:11, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, when updating infobox stats you should update the |pcupdate= or |club-update= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 16:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seasider91. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seasider91. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:30, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]