We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. We've had some shakeups regarding late entries, flag changes and early dropouts, but the competition is now established- there will be no more flag changes or new competitors. Congratulations to Sasata (submissions), our current leader, who, at the time of writing, has more listed points than Hunter Kahn (submissions) and TonyTheTiger (submissions) (second and third place respectively) combined. A special well done also goes to Fetchcomms (submissions)- his artcle Jewel Box (St. Louis, Missouri) was the first content to score points in the competition.

Around half of competitors are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. 64 of the 149 current competitors will advance to round 2- if you currently have no points, do not worry, as over half of the current top 64 have under 50 points. Everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places in round 2! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! J Milburn, Garden, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:20, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How can you possibly say that TV.com is not a reliable source for what TV.com says? If you want to make the argument that TV.com's noting of the gag is not grounds for determining notability, then make it on the AFD, but don't delete the text. Please stop edit-warring and restore the cite, which was perfectly legitimate. THF (talk) 01:05, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aloha! I am tasked with the Wikipedia Signpost report on WikiProject Olympics, to coincide with the 2010 Winter Olympics. I have compiled some questions at here, and was wondering if you would be interested in answering them on behalf of the project. Thanks, Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 19:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the answers! Ks0stm If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. 23:49, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On February 6, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Boy Meets Curl, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, first off, cheers for the article warning advice.

As for GSP 2012 stuff, I just did a straight undo I think, so that was the reason for the readding of whatever statement you originally removed. Wasn't my intention to readd dodgy stuff; I just wanted to keep the 2012 stuff under its own heading.

If you disagree with that, as you've explained, then change it if you like. I'm not going to insist upon it; I just thought it would help. Majority decision call on this, I'd think. Perhaps a consensus on the GSP talk page? Paralympiakos (talk) 03:56, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! As a very active member of WikiProject Olympics, you have been chosen to be featured in this week’s Wikipedia Signpost!!

Please answer the questions by tonight, it goes to press tomorrow!! Thank you,

Belugaboy535136 ^contribs 19:55, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I am contacting everyone who participated in the previous AFD to inform them the same exact article is up for deletion again. Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_The_Simpsons_couch_gags_(2nd_nomination)#List_of_The_Simpsons_couch_gags Dream Focus 04:49, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's been a while for me to return to WP. I burned out a bit and just got consumed with real life, but I'm trying to slowly work my way back into editing and reviewing. I noticed that the Olympic Ice Hockey article is up for Main Page posting for the start of the Olympics on the 12th. Congratulations. I know how much work and vigilence it took to get that article to FA. Despite persistent nationalistic editing and some rancorous episodes you were able to persevere and now it will reach the top spot. Enjoy it and the accolades that come from all your hard work. H1nkles (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If it is going on the Main Page, should you request some semi-protection or something? ʘ alaney2k • talkʘ 16:30, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it will go to protection. Did we ever have a 'note' under the medal table, (stating the obvious) that the medals table follows Olympic standard? Also, I think you can have a pop-up warning on an edit. I don't know how to do it, but you might want to consider it. I think Djsasso knows how to install one. ʘ alaney2k ʘ (talk) 16:39, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page articles are not pre-emptively protected except in extreme cases. Anyway, congrats on making the main page! I have to say though that thanks to the time shift, I find it ironic that this article will be off the main page tomorrow before the opening ceremonies even happen! Guess we shoulda thought of that and had it posted tomorrow, lol. Resolute 00:53, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, people should not revert to edit warring when they have a dispute. That's why I ask you to please stop undoing my edits (as you have three times already), and instead discuss the changes either on the article's talk page or the Professional Wrestling portal's talk page. Thanks. Cheers, Sourside21 (talk) 02:28, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

Why do you insist on deleting "[Canada] has won at least one medal at every Olympics it has competed at"? It's true (even including the Olympics going on right now; they've already got one), and a perfectly fine thing to put in an intro Purplebackpack89 ^{(Notes Taken) (Locker)} 17:02, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the reason I was including that is because people have been duplicating edits, and I felt like if it were staring people in the face that someone had already edited for that event, it would cut down on the gratuitous nationalistic duplicate edits. I'm too lazy to fight about it though, so we'll leave it be. Thanks! Kingnavland (talk) 04:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

...at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2009 IIHF World Championship rosters/archive1, when you have the time. Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 04:29, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I see you've changed the colors to some of the infoboxes I've added. I was trying to have a different color for every different sport, if possible, but you seem to be changing these. Any particular reason why? Connormah (talk | contribs) 23:40, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. Any suggestions? I'd be happy to change them if you see them to be distracting. Connormah (talk | contribs) 23:45, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I just thought the color codes could help distinguish, and for the aesthetics, too. How about  , or  ? Connormah (talk | contribs) 23:50, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, that's great. I'll get to changing them tonight. Connormah (talk | contribs) 23:59, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

On February 17, 2010, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mealy Mountains National Park Reserve, which you created or substantially expanded. You are welcome to check how many hits your article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check ) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Materialscientist (talk) 12:10, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you offer any rational for deleting the external links to other public domain Olympic Medal Tables? BuffaloBob (talk) 02:40, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Much oblidged. I've found my copy of Ortved's book again, but as its the UK Ebury Press edition, do you think we should just use the Greystokes publication of it for all our sources? If so, could you give me the page number for the Rich Appel quote where he talks about falling asleep? And also the Scully section, which sould help balance out the other negative stuff I'm about to add. Cheers. Gran² 17:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was unaware of the decision during the previous Olympics to omit top ten summaries, fair enough. Is there any section where you think the summary could go? As I know statistics can be interpreted however the reader believes, I thought that the summary was pertinent in regards to "Own the podium". What is your opinion of it going in there? Would it have to be expanded? Is this the right talk place or should I have used the article discussion? TIA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Emeraldthursday (talk • contribs) 05:14, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your logic is a tad flawed for a few reasons. Of course Barack Obama is the President of the USA but many articles other than the main Obama article call him "President Obama". In fact, if "of course it's normally called hockey" then that's PROOF IT SHOULD BE IN. It's also used in the field hockey article and I've never heard a single thing on TV, radio, internet, etc call it "ice hockey". Especially when they're not playing any other kind at the WINTER Olympics. --TheTruthiness (talk) 05:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide insight, as I know nothing about inspirations for most of the characters. CTJF83 GoUSA 00:39, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. You are being notified as you have made a number of contributions to the article. I have found some concerns which you can see at Talk:Bon Scott/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:22, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote a response to your message on the talk page of Triple Gold Club.Lejman (talk) 05:05, 25 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

	The Olympics Barnstar
	For the laudable and noticeably dedicated work you put on Ice hockey at the Olympic Games—turning it into an example of what should be an article of excellence in Wikipedia—I hereby award you this long due barnstar as a sign of recognition and appreciation by the WikiProject Olympics. — Parutakupiu (talk) 00:48, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, congratulations on the hockey victory! What an amazing Games for Canada ;) Parutakupiu (talk) 00:50, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Round one is over, and round two has begun! Congratulations to the 64 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our first round. A special well done goes to Sasata (submissions), our round one winner (1010 points), and to Hunter Kahn (submissions) and TonyTheTiger (submissions), who were second and third respectively (640 points/605 points). Sasata was awarded the most points for both good articles (300 points) and featured articles (600 points), and TonyTheTiger was awarded the most for featured topics (225 points), while Hunter Kahn claimed the most for good topics (70). Staxringold (submissions) claimed the most featured lists (240 points) and featured pictures (35 points), Geschichte (submissions) claimed the most for Did you know? entries (490 points), Jujutacular (submissions) claimed the most for featured sounds (70 points) and Candlewicke (submissions) claimed the most for In the news entries (40 points). No one claimed a featured portal or valued picture.

Credits awarded after the end of round one but before round two may be claimed in round two, but remember the rule that content must have been worked on in some significant way during 2010 by you for you to claim points. The groups for round two will be placed up shortly, and the submissions' pages will be blanked. This round will continue until 28 April, when the top two users from each group, as well as 16 wildcards, will progress to round three. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup; thank you to all doing this last round, and particularly to those helping at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:52, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's odd that while 216.205.234.2 apparently says Ortved is unreliable as a source, it actually used it as a source itself [1]. And so the other is 76.94.46.182, who apparently dislikes the fact that Jean is divorced [2]. I really hope one of them is Jean, that'd be hilarious. Perhaps it'd explain all of those 'classic' Wikipedia 'jokes' they keep putting in the 'show'. Do you think we should try and get them to talk to us? Maybe we could suggest that they actually bother writing an official Fox censored endorsed history of the show, so we can use that instead... Gran² 17:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiProject Baseball Major League Order of Merit
		Whereas Scorpion0422 has participated in the promotion of various and sundry lists and articles toward the admirable end goal of creating the Major League Baseball awards Featured Topic; and Whereas the project expresses its appreciation to the participants for their hard work and dedication to furthering the coverage of the sport of Baseball; and Whereas the aforementioned Featured Topic has been recognized by a group of peers and promoted to Featured Status on March 5, 2010— Therefore, Scorpion0422 is hereby presented with the inaugural WikiProject Baseball Major League Order of Merit, in recognition for steadfast and meritorious service to the Project, the Cause, and the Encyclopedia. This Order of Merit presented by KV5 (Talk • Phils) on 17:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC) as a representative of WP:MLB. Guaranteed free of performance-enhancing substances.[reply]

Do you think it's ready for GAN? Theleftorium 19:15, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bump. Theleftorium 15:21, 9 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That part was written by Gran2 so I'm not sure, but I think that's the only commentary that mentions the Disney contract. Theleftorium 18:42, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GAC ready? I added to the reception, and could only find one cultural reference. I just left it in it's own section pending you deciding if we should put it in the production section, or remove it all together (I lean towards remove). CTJF83 chat 20:51, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, can you weigh in User_talk:Theleftorium#Simpsons...and_more (2nd half) CTJF83 chat 21:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is Neighborhoods of Davenport, Iowa anywhere near FL? On the GA review the reviewer thought it should be an FL, cause it "is essentially a list". Left said I should ask you if you think it should be an FL or GA/FA CTJF83 chat 20:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestions. CTJF83 chat 22:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In case you weren't aware Wikipedia:Peer review/Stark Raving Dad/archive1 CTJF83 chat 19:32, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've offered a review, and placed the article on hold pending the resolution of certain issues. J Milburn (talk) 23:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I might have time to work on it in the future, but not right now. You're more than welcome to finish it if you'd like. :) Theleftorium 12:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

Hey, there are some unresolved issues at this FLC. Are you still keeping track of it? Cheers, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:21, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the barnstar! My philosophy is that if I can take care of the little stylistic and maintainence-related things (e.g. adding in alt text and keeping FLC running smoothly), other editors can focus on improving articles and worry less about the periphery (anyway, I'm a woefully lazy and inefficient article writer). Dabomb87 (talk) 01:09, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, did you get around to addressing Arsenikk's comments? Dabomb87 (talk) 21:06, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SimpsonsBitey.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. CTJF83 chat 21:58, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just a quick follow up on the page disruption notice from a month back...

See WT:PW. ^{--UnquestionableTruth--} 05:30, 18 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you recently updated an article dealing with Sport in Canada. You might be interested to know that there is a project aimed at improving articles on this subject. Feel free to stop by and help out, we'd love to have you! HalifaxRage (talk) 14:10, 19 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you guys keep erasing my edit? It is obviously correct, and "The Brother from Another Planet" is also mentioned on the "Brother from Another series" page, so what's the problem? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stretno dijete (talk • contribs) 23:28, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the pile of recent Simpson-related AFDs, I have found that Ned Goldreyer, Steve Pepoon, and David Richardson (writer) have all won notable awards for works outside The Simpsons. I have added these to their respective articles and sourced them to show meeting WP:ANYBIO. Further assistance would be much appreciated. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 04:59, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

I take it you've seen the recent campaign to get Phil a star on the Canada Walk of Fame? [3] Anyway, I found Phil's brother Paul on Facebook, so, after over two years of looking, I should actually get a free-use image of Phil. Gran² 18:13, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, that's a truly fantastic achievement. Much back slapping all around. Guess we need some new goals. At some point though, we may need to clean up some of the earlier season 8 and 9 GAs, they seem to have aged quite a bit. Ah well. I also think we should seriously considering merging most of the crapper episodes into the season articles and just keep a select few which have enough coverage. Even if some are recreated when the DVDs are released (although will Jean commentaries be any better than Scully's?) then fine. But, is anybody really going to have the sudden urge to do season 12? I doubt it. Gran² 19:33, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I revert vandalism when I see it. It is vandalism. Makes sense, eh? –Turian (talk) 18:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well then, I'll stop. I mean, I don't really care enough about any of this to really care if I get reported or banned, or anything like that. But at the same time, I'm not trying to cause trouble with any of this. I'm just doing what's right as per this particular situation. I know Wikipedia doesn't worry about spoilers, but this isn't even a spoiler yet, and the event hasn't really been made available more mass public consumption yet. It's just a case of premature reporting. I'm trying to get him to understand that, while Smackdown will probably end on Friday with Jack Swagger as the World Heavyweight Champion, there is no way of knowing that now, and what happened last night is not official until you see it on your TV screen. Sorry for the trouble. 76.111.13.156 (talk) 18:44, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey,

I noticed you have written the List of Nobel laureates. I have just nominated Nobel Prize for FA and I would love to have some comments or support on the nomination page. Since you are familiar with the subject already I hoped you could check it out perhaps? --Esuzu (talk • contribs) 22:15, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We're half way through round two, and everything is running smoothly. Hunter Kahn (submissions) leads overall with 650 points this round, and heads pool B. TonyTheTiger (submissions) currently leads pool C, dubbed the "Group of Death", which has a only a single contestant yet to score this round (the fewest of any group), as well five contestants over 100 points (the most). With a month still to go, as well as 16 wildcard places, everything is still to play for. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Although unrelated to the WikiCup, April sees a Good Article Nominations backlog elimination drive, formulated as a friendly competition with small awards, as the Cup is. Several WikiCup contestants and judges have already signed up, but regular reviewers and those who hope to do more reviewing are more than welcome to join at the drive page. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) 22:21, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have passed the GAN. There are some notes that will be of interest if you wish to continue improving it. Nice work.Cptnono (talk) 11:21, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please also see the notes for the promoted Bart the Lover.Cptnono (talk) 10:10, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Simpsons: An Uncensored, Unauthorized History you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:The Simpsons: An Uncensored, Unauthorized History for things which need to be addressed. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 21:32, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ItchyScratchyLemonade.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Theleftorium 22:23, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ISMDavid.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Theleftorium 22:23, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The WikiProject Professional wrestling Newsletter

Welcome to the biggest WikiCup Wikipedia has yet seen! Round one will take place over two months, and finish on February 26. There is only one pool, and the top 64 will progress. The competition will be tough, as more than half of the current competitors will not make it to round 2. Details about scoring have been finalized and are explained at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. Please make sure you're familiar with the scoring rules, because any submissions made that violate these rules will be removed. Like always, the judges can be reached through the WikiCup talk pages, on their talk page, or over IRC with any issues concerning anything tied to the Cup. We will keep in contact with you via weekly newsletters; if you do not want to receive them, please remove yourself from the list here. Conversely, if a non-WikiCup participant wishes to receive the newsletters, they may add themselves to that list. Well, enough talk- get writing! Your submission's page is located here. Details on how to submit your content is located here, so be sure to check that out! Once content has been recognized, it can be added to your submissions page, from which our bot will update the main score table. Remember that only articles worked on and nominated during the competition are eligible for points. Have fun, and good luck! Garden, iMatthew, J Milburn, and The ed17 19:23, 31 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article Homer Defined, which you nominated as a Good Article, is undergoing review. The article does not seem to meet the requirements for a good article. It has been put on hold for a week; if these issues are addressed satisfactorily within that period the article will be promoted to GA, otherwise it will be failed. Lampman (talk) 04:10, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One one hand I felt I couldn't condone the approach certain editors were taking to fair use images, but on the other hand I realised I couldn't fail it over this issue. That's why I put it up for a second opinion, and the matter seems to have been resolved now. At least I managed to give it a bit of a copy-edit, so my review wasn't a complete waste of time. Good luck with further articles! Lampman (talk) 23:52, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there, when you get the chance can you take a second look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Olympic women's ice hockey players for the United States/archive1 and check that your concerns have been resolved? Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 21:30, 6 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, not sure if you noticed Felipe Menegaz's comment at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/2010 Winter Olympics medal table/archive1. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:28, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing; just a note that Resolute responded to you at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of NHL players with 50-goal seasons/archive1. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:28, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note. So should I assume that you don't intend to add a medal map per Felipe's suggestion (just to clarify)? Dabomb87 (talk) 21:55, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One more thing: can you take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Olympic medalists in luge/archive1? You're a pro at bringing those lists up to FL standard, so if there is anything that needs to be fixed, you'd probably recognize it. Thanks, Dabomb87 (talk) 19:13, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've promoted the article. Thanks for your patience. J Milburn (talk) 12:55, 8 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I left some stuff for you. Theleftorium 14:40, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck arguing with that guy about the images. He is apparently on an anti-non-free image campaign. He also made similar arguments at my current FAC before opposing claiming the single non-free image, the book's cover, failed NFCC and therefore the FA criteria. He's done this on half a dozen other FAs so far, and no matter how you try to reason with him, he still turns around an opposes. On the good side, it seems like he is also mostly ignored by other reviewers and by the delegates because his arguments really are badly made and seem to reflect a complete misunderstanding of the entire non-free policy. 14:20, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Hi. You recently reverted my edit to the Blood Feud (The Simpsons)‎‎ article with no explanation. If you looked at my edit, you'd see that I converted a hard to read, disjointed paragraph into a number of bullet points. I see no reason why you would object to that. -Roger (talk) 04:56, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You've again reverted my edit with no explanation. Please at least acknowledge my original comment before doing so again. Thanks. -Roger (talk) 15:26, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the barnstar! You're a great help to the project too!

		The Simpsons (Annoyed Grunt)-star
		I'm awarding you this star for all your help on the classic seasons good article drive. Plus an extra thank you for taking the initiative of thanking all the other users involved with the drive. Keep up all your great work! CTJF83 chat 18:19, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Crap, Ctjf83 beat me to it! Theleftorium 20:01, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm Moisejp and I'm part of the WikiProject Bob Dylan. How are you doing? The WikiProject Dylan is currently working on trying to bring The Freewheelin' Bob Dylan to Feature Article status. As you may know, this album appeared on the Rolling Stone Greatest 500 Albums of All Time list. We used the Rolling Stone website to cite the album's ranking, but lo and behold, Rolling Stone appears to have recently removed the list from its archives, and it cannot be accessed with the Internet Wayback Machine either. I was thinking of citing the published book or magazine versions of the list. Some of the bibliographical information I can easily find online, but other info, such as the page number, I can't. I noticed you have done a fair amount of contributing to The 500 Greatest Albums of All Time. I was wondering whether you might possibly own a book or magazine copy of the list, or know another editor who does. Then I could hopefully track down all the necessary bibliographical info. Please let me know if you know anything, thanks! Moisejp (talk) 11:24, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks so much!! You've been a big help! Moisejp (talk) 21:46, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Let's not continue reverting at List of Nobel laureates in Literature. I've started a discussion here. [4] Regards, JohnWBarber (talk) 02:52, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Round two is over, and we are down to our final 32. For anyone interested in the final standings (though not arranged by group) this page has been compiled. Congratulations to Hunter Kahn (submissions), our clear overall round winner, and to ThinkBlue (submissions) and Arsenikk (submissions), who were solidly second and third respectively. There were a good number of high scorers this round- competition was certainly tough! Round three begins tomorrow, but anything promoted after the end of round two is eligible for points. 16 contestants (eight pool leaders and eight wildcards) will progress to round four in two months- things are really starting to get competitive. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Judge iMatthew has retired from Wikipedia, and we wish him the best. The competition has been ticking over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. A special thank you goes to participants Stone (submissions) and White Shadows (submissions) for their help in preparing for round three. Good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 17:38, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It has recently been brought to the attention of WP:PW that the newsletter is being to delivered to several users who have not been actively editing for several months. As a result, their talk pages have become increasingly large, unmanageable and slow to load due to a lack of archiving.
In response, this message is being sent to all editors listed in Category:WikiProject Professional wrestling participants to say that anyone who does not list their name at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active before May 16 will be automatically listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, and will no longer receive the newsletter or any notification of it. If you are added to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Nospam, please feel free to remove your name if you desire.
If you wish to continue receiving the newsletter as normal, please add your name to Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Active. If you simply wish to receive notification of a new issue, but not have the full newsletter delivered to your talk page, please add your name to the notification only list.
If you have any queries please contact me at my talk page or leave a message at WT:PW. Thank you for your co-operation. ♥Nici♥Vampire♥Heart♥ 00:36, 2 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

According to ARIA (here), the ARIA Hall of Fame induction of AC/DC in 1988 is also an ARIA Award and is counted in their total of three wins from five nominations. Could you return the List of awards and nominations received by AC/DC back to the more accurate form.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 07:00, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, sometimes I miss comments that an editor made, particularly if it was only one time and they never followed up. As for Lisa, I feel like there could be more about her overall character: she's the middle child, more of her activism (she lived in a tree to prevent its destruction, that one comes to mind), she was part of MENSA.... come to think of it, a lot of that is redundant with what you have in "Personality", so that section probably doesn't need much (if any) more. I think more pressing are details on the Yeardly Smith audition (which is important to Lisa Simpson as an encyclopedia article), and the negative reception (which is how the real world looks at her). Let me know when/if you nom it again. --Hurricanehink (talk) 02:54, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, since I reviewed yours, I was wondering if you could review an FAC of mine - Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Cyclone Gonu/archive1. Thanks if you get the chance! Hurricanehink (talk) 17:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yea, that audition stuff is better, how it's a little clearer. Good luck w/ the negative reception, tho. --Hurricanehink (talk) 23:09, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Judge Me Tender, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.foxflash.com/div.php/main/page?aID=1z4&mo=5&d=19, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under allowance license, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Judge Me Tender and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Judge Me Tender, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Judge Me Tender with a link to where we can find that note.
• If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Judge Me Tender. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at . Leave a note at Talk:Judge Me Tender saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Whywhenwhohow (talk) 21:44, 16 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Scorpion, Radiowallah here. Sorry not to use the Sandbox for National Parks list. New to this. I'm going to construct the table with as many photos as I can find and reinsert it complete. If you still think it doesn't work, no doubt you will want to revert it. I think there's much to be gained with the photos as part of the table. Maybe it's premature for a Descriptions column. But see what you think. Anyway, as we're both Leafs fans, surely we can agree... Radiowallah (talk) 23:51, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Radiowallah[reply]

Thanks for fixing my error. Narssarssuaq (talk) 13:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated Rock the Park, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock the Park. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Deconstructhis (talk) 23:09, 30 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

... in reverting the "sortable" option from the coaches section? What harm does it do? "As far as you know" there won't be any new coaches anytime soon. How far do you know? Have you done any research? LarRan (talk) 20:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I did do some research. I looked at the coaches of this year's final teams. Joel Quenneville and Peter Laviolette have never won Olympic gold medals. As far as I know, there aren't any Olympic Games or World Championships coming up any time soon (I could be wrong, but these things tend to be spaced out).

So considering that, I concluded that there won't be any new coach members any time soon, so there's no need to make a table of one sortable. Simple enough. -- Scorpion⁰⁴²² 20:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My reasons were (1) uniformity, (2) future use (you never know...). But whatever. LarRan (talk) 20:13, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not really sure, I did mention other, more recent images, but the implication was that this was the only useable one he had. Not that I'm complaining. I'll probably mail him again in a few months to see how the star campaign is going (apparently the Canadian Walk of Fame attempt failed, so they're trying for the Hollywood walk before they attempt it again) so I’ll ask if he has others. It's a really shame nobody close to the show is reachable though (apart from Bill of course). I've contacted Hank, Yeardley and Silverman on Twitter touting for images, but none of them responded. Gran² 20:06, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

He said Phil "came in third" and thus doesn't get on this year. I've no idea if that makes sense but you're the expert on the process. I'll probably message Josh at some point... Julie Kavner is now chief image priority. Gran² 20:24, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We are half way through round 3, with a little under a month to go. The current overall leader is Sasata (submissions), who has 570 points. He leads pool C. Pools A, B and D are led by Hunter Kahn (submissions), Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) and White Shadows (submissions) respectively. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Two of last year's final 8, Theleftorium (submissions) and Scorpion0422 (submissions), have dropped out of the competition, saying they would rather their place went to someone who will have more time on their hands than them next round. On a related note, a special thank you goes to White Shadows (submissions) for his help behind the scenes once again. There is currently a problem with the poster, perhaps caused by the new skin- take a look at this discussion and see if you can help. The competition has continued to tick over well with minimal need for judge intervention, so thank you to everyone making that possible. Good luck to all! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 20:53, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scorpion0422. FYI, when proposing categories for deletion, you should add {{subst:cfd}} to the top of the category, not just {{cfd}}, as you did here. I have fixed that one for you. Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 23:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I see you've been around a long time, so you probably already knew that and it was just an error. Sorry. DH85868993 (talk) 23:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted your edit, as noted above the list the order isn't in order of his favorite but by air date, if he said that a particular episode was his favorite then of course that information should be added and sourced to a page but it's no reason to destroy the entire list. I copied the list order from page 70 of the book by the way in case you want to check my sourcing. I'll add the page to my watchlist and will happily discuss any changes on the talk page if you would like. Cat-five - talk 17:28, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• I added the information about his favorite episode above the list, conveniently it was on the same page which made sourcing easy and I hope that it works for you in trying to get that information out while still maintaining the list. Cat-five - talk 17:40, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. WikiProject Futurama is being revived. Since you are listed as a participant here, you have received this message to make sure you still are. If you like to help update the WikiProject, please discuss here. Hopefully you can stay with us and continue to work on Futurama-related articles. GamerPro64 (talk) delivered by MuZebot 06:50, 6 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Since you are familiar with reviewing Lists of National Treasures of Japan, I thought you could help out with the following... List of National Treasures of Japan (archaeological materials) is presently a featured list candidate and marked as Nominations urgently needing reviews which means that it is in danger of failing the nomination due to a lack of reviews. I'd be happy, if you could have a look at the list and leave comments, questions or suggestions at the nomination page. The criteria to be checked against are found here. Thanks. bamse (talk) 14:24, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Scorpion. I had a question to ask you about the Canada's Walk of Fame article. I found an article on the web a couple of days ago, while checking out information on this year's honourees. It was an article about the director of the Walk of Fame surprising a radio reporter with her very own honourary star. I have not heard anything else about the previous honourees and do not know whether it should be added into either the main page or the list of all honourees as the other 6 have not. I'll leave it up to you to decide. Thanks.

http://www.broadcastermagazine.com/issues/story.aspx?aid=1000374109 65.92.22.48 (talk) 19:55, 10 June 2010 (UTC)samusek2[reply]

Hi Scorp. Wow, it's been so long since I used my account I've forgotten all the code.

As you probably know I've gone in a different direction. I moved away from Wikipedia after I found other ways to express my writing skills. I probably won't return as a dedicated editor, and I most likely won't be trying for any more GAs. Glad to see you guys are still getting there. :D

Thanks for the barnstar, and good luck for the future. Tell Gran2 and those other guys I said hi/bye.

All the best, ...hmmm, what's the code for signatures... oh right, --Simpsons fan 66 08:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[5] Do you not like Mr. Groening's choice of favorite episode? ;) Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:32, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be on in a few minutes, I just need to install a Java update... Gran² 18:42, 20 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've updated the awards list with the Emmys noms, could you check to make sure I did it correctly? Also, I left off the nom for Spurlock's documentary, should we include that? Gran² 14:58, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I traced the guy's IP address: sure enough it is operating from 10201 Pico Boulevard. Otherwise known as the 20th Century Fox lot. So it's a Fox employee, I've got a feeling it may actually be Jean himself (or his assistant), especially when it makes edits like this [6]. But why is Jean so concerned about Ortved? Unless he can't take his deserved criticism. I mean I would understand if Brooks or Groening sued (and they probably are), so Jean must really be sticking up for his bosses... But why object to saying Meyer led the rewrite room? Crazy. Anyway, in the event that it is a Fox employee, I left a request for images, let's get some use from him. Oh, and it seems Dan Greaney doesn't mean it when he says things: [7]...

As for Emmys, at least Matthew Fox and Elizabeth Mitchell (for some reason) got nominated, both were long overdue. But Nestor should have been nominated. Anyway, I'm currently working on Oakley's page. My aim for the summer is to get all of the showrunners done. Gran² 09:23, 13 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quick question: Do you know who the composer on The Simpsons was before Alf Clausen? Did the show even have one? Gran² 17:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We're half way through 2010, and the end of the WikiCup is in sight! Round 3 is over, and we're down to our final 16. Our pool winners were Ian Rose (submissions) (A), Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) (B, and the round's overall leader), ThinkBlue (submissions) (C) Casliber (submissions) and TonyTheTiger (submissions) (D, joint), but, with the scores reset, everything is to play for in our last pooled round. The pools will be up before midnight tonight, and have been selected randomly by J Milburn. This will be the toughest round yet, and so, as ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Though unaffiliated with the WikiCup, July sees the third Great Wikipedia Dramaout- a project with not dissimilar goals to the WikiCup. Everyone is welcome to take part and do their bit to contribute to the encyclopedia itself.

If you're interested in the scores for the last round of the Cup, please take a look at Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010/Round 3 and Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010/Full/Round 3. Our thanks go to Stone (submissions) for compiling these. As was predicted, Group C ended up the "Group of Death", with 670 points required for second place, and, therefore, automatic promotion. This round will probably be even tougher- again, the top two from each of the two groups will make it through, while the twelve remaining participants will compete for four wildcard places- good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17

I only added, not deleted information regarding background music for that particular episode. Why did you revert it with no explanation? I was quite clear on the edit page what was added, and I believe it is valuable information since I find many people searching for the background music to The Simpsons (and many other television shows) episodes. I always go to Wikipedia myself first for background music information.

Was there a particular reason for the reversion?

Anthonix

--Anthonix (talk) 09:53, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We are half-way through our penultimate round, and nothing is yet certain. Pool A, currently led by Sasata (submissions) has ended up the more competitive, with three contestants ( Sasata (submissions), Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) and TonyTheTiger (submissions)) scoring over 500 points already. Pool B is led by Casliber (submissions), who has also scored well over 500. The top two from each pool, as well as the next four highest scorers regardless of pool, will make it through to our final eight. As ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Planning has begun for the 2011 WikiCup, with open discussions concerning scoring and flags for next year's competition. Contributions to those discussions would be appreciated, especially concerning the flags, as next year's signups cannot begin until the flag issue has been resolved. Signups will hopefully open at some point in this round, with discussion about possible changing in the scoring/process opening some time afterwards.

Earlier this round, we said goodbye to Hunter Kahn (submissions), who has bowed out to spend more time on the book he is authoring with his wife. We wish him all the best. In other news, the start of this round also saw some WikiCup awards sent out by Suomi Finland 2009 (submissions). We appreciate his enthusiasm, and contestants are of course welcome to award each other prizes as they see fit, but rest assured that we will be sending out "official" awards at the end of the competition. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 22:46, 31 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You really need to improve the fair-use rationale on this one. I have a feeling someone is going to oppose over it. Welcome back by the way! I hope you don't mind the changes I made to the article. Theleftorium ^(talk) 09:55, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Yeah, I'm surprised by the lack of reviews. It's not exactly a boring article. Theleftorium ^(talk) 17:38, 1 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey scorpion how would you make a first season artical FT. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 06:17, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Mostly Family Guy season 1. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 04:32, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How is this episode not religious enough? Sure, when compared to the other Christian themed episodes in the series, I'd agree with you. But, as for Hindu themes, it's probably more HIndu-centric than "The Two Mr's Nahasapeemapetilons", currently included in the list. Apu comes to live with the Simpsons in order to work off his karmic debt for what he did to Homer. He decides to go on a pilgrimage to India to see the head of the Kwik-E-Mart coporation. Once they get there, the head of the corp. is a wise old yogi living on top of a mountain who doles out wisdom sparingly. These Hindu themes are much more pervasive and a larger part of the story that the Hindu tradition of arranged marriage is in the only other Hindu-centric episode in the list. I added it because it is on my list of religiously themed episodes that I'm using to teach a "Theology of the Simpsons" class at a Unitarian church and I was surprised to see that it was not on the list here on Wikipedia. This seemed like an omission to me for sure. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tetsuo29 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Saw that the article had more than 10 entries, which makes it "eligible" for WP:FLC. Since you were the primary contributor of the article, I was wondering if you could nominate it for FLC? If not, then I could nominate the article if you want. Hope you're just wikibreaking, since I see you haven't edited in more than 10 days... --K. Annoyomous (talk) 10:45, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me scorpion but the picture on the Simpson main page how did you get it, the one with all the writers in it. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 17:50, 26 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you come on IRC at some point if you have a chance? Cheers, Gran² 20:06, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging You asked "Did you ever pause to think that maybe there's a reason why the 100+ Simpsons-related templates and categories were not part of WP:DOH?" The answer is no. You want me to remove the tag from them, but I don't see the point as they are only in Category:NA-importance The Simpsons articles and Category:NA-Class The Simpsons articles and only they are in Category:NA-importance The Simpsons articles and Category:NA-Class The Simpsons articles. What would be the point of removing the tag? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The purpose The purpose of tagging is to identify what belongs to which WikiProjects; these categories are automatically generated and populated. If the WikiProject doesn't want to do anything with them, they don't have to do anything with them; just leave them sitting there and they won't hurt anything. Later on, if they need to be identified, they have a tag. I'm still not seeing the harm or the problem that needs to be solved here. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:27, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article space Looking over the project and its talk page, the only indication that I see that the WikiProject exclusively focuses on the main article namespace is here and that's hardly a strong consensus to exclude the other namespaces in addition to the fact that this tag in no way harms anything and is potentially useful. I don't really care for the implication that I'm lazy, though and I think you're being uncivil. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:55, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edit count Okay, I didn't do it to up my edit count; I did it to be helpful. Why are you being so rude to me? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:59, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to butt in here, but koavf is on my watchlist and I was curious! My questions are simple, "If the Simpsons-related articles should not be tagged as Simpsons project, what should they be tagged? Or should they be left to disappear into the ether because nobody actually cares? In which case why doesn't the project just ask for them to be deleted? Feel free to ignore or reply here. Cheers. Richhoncho (talk) 10:20, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We have our final eight! The best of luck to those who remain. A bumper newsletter this week as we start our home straight.

• Pool A's winner was Sturmvogel_66 (submissions). Awarded the top score overall this round, Sturmvogel_66 writes primarily on military history, favouring Naval warfare.
• Pool B's winner was Casliber (submissions). Awarded the top score for featured articles this round, Casliber writes primarily on natural sciences, especially botany and ornithology.
• Pool A's close second was Sasata (submissions). Awarded the top score for featured pictures this round, Sasata writes primarily on natural sciences, favouring mycology.
• Pool B's close second was ThinkBlue (submissions). Awarded the top score for good articles and topics this round, ThinkBlue primarily writes content related to television and film, including 30 Rock.
• The first wildcard was TonyTheTiger (submissions). Awarded the top score for did you knows and valued pictures this round, TonyTheTiger writes on a number of topics, including baseball, American football and Chicago.
• The second wildcard was White Shadows (submissions). Someone who has helped the Cup behind the scenes all year, White Shadows said "I'm still in shock that I made it this far" and writes primarily on Naval warfare, especially U-boats.
• The third wildcard was Staxringold (submissions). Awarded the top score for featured lists and topics this round, Staxringold primarily writes on sport and television, including baseball and 30 Rock.
• The fourth wildcard was William S. Saturn (submissions). Entering the final eight only on the final day of the round, William S. Saturn writes on a number of topics, mostly related to Texas.

We say goodbye to the six who fell at the final hurdle. Geschichte (submissions) only just missed out on a place in the final eight. Resolute (submissions) was not far behind. Candlewicke (submissions) was awarded top points for in the news this round. Gary King (submissions) contributed a variety of did you know articles. Suomi Finland 2009 (submissions) said "I'm surprised to have survived so far into the competition", but was extactic to see Finland in the semi-finals. Arsenikk (submissions) did not score this round, but has scored highly in previous rounds. We also say goodbye to Ian Rose (submissions), who withdrew earlier this month after spending six weeks overseas. Anyone interested in this round's results can see them here and here. Thank you to Stone (submissions) for these.

Signups for next year's competition are now open. Planning is ongoing, with a key discussion about judges for next year open. Discussion about how next year's scoring will work is ongoing, and thoughts are more than welcome at Wikipedia talk:WikiCup/Scoring. Also, TonyTheTiger is compiling some information and statistics on the finalists here- the final eight are encouraged to add themselves to the list.

Our final eight will play it out for two months, after which we will know 2010's WikiCup winner, and a variety of prizes will be awarded. As ever, anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 23:15, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Scorpioin do you know any good copy editor who can do a good job and is abailaval. --Pedro J. ^{the rookie} 22:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have given the article a quick spruce-up and plan to take it to FLC to try and preserve the NHL Awards Featured Topic. As you are still the editor with the most edits to the article, could you confirm that you are OK with this? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:50, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI. Hope you're doing well, Dabomb87 (talk) 17:28, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You promoted this featured list, so I thought you might be able to help me with a request. If my request cannot be accommodated, of if it needs to be directed elsewhere, I understand. List of awards and nominations received by Rufus Wainwright was promoted under my previous username (Whataworld06). I would love for the list to be credited to my current (and permanent) username, Another Believer. Is there any way this could be accommodated? I figured updating all occurrences of my former username might also help with bot functions like the one that updates this list. Perhaps this page could be updated or a log containing FL promotions could be updated to credit the list to my current username? --Another Believer _(Talk) 20:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind. This issue has been resolved. --Another Believer _(Talk) 23:33, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We are half-way through our final round, entering the home straight. TonyTheTiger (submissions) leads at the time of writing with 1180 points, immediately followed by Sasata (submissions) with 1175 points. Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) closely follows in third place with 1100 points. For those who are interested, data about the finalists has been compiled at Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010/finalists, while a list of content submitted by all WikiCup contestants prior to this round has been compiled at Wikipedia:WikiCup/History/2010/Submissions. As ever, anything contestants worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Despite controversy, the WikiCup remains open. Signups for next year's competition are more than welcome, and suggestions for how next year's competition will work are appreciated at Wikipedia talk:WikiCup/Scoring. More general comments and discussions should be directed at the WikiCup talk page. One month remains in the 2010 WikiCup, after which we will know our champion. Good luck everyone! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 23:08, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please weigh in on this, so I can get a few more people in on the consensus and then implement it. Thanks, CTJF83 chat 03:35, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are interested, I just created List of 1992 Summer Olympics medal winners. I saw that you have worked very successfully on Olympics-related lists in the past, so I thought I would give you a heads up! Keep up the great work! --Another Believer _(Talk) 23:33, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message as you previously posted in the ongoing RfC on whether Featured List Criteria section 3b should be modified or eliminated. Based on feedback and commentary received during the section-by-section analysis of the current criteria, I have proposed a new version of the criteria here. I would like your input on ways to improve and refine this proposal, in hopes of reaching consensus to implement this change to the criteria. Thank you for your attention. –Grondemar 17:11, 9 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

User:Scorpion0422 please join the discussion at Template talk:Treehouse of Horror , your input is appreciated.

I'm sorry that we're butting heads like this, but we both seem to think that the other is misunderstanding the purpose of a template. I was recruited IRL to fix the template in the manner I am attempting to. I am now going to recruit some editors who have previous edited the ThoH template, so they can chime in. Please, do us all a favor and stop undo-ing the relevant, useful and valid edits that are increasing to the usability of the template. There is simple, overly-simplistic, and stubbornly overly-simplistic ... guess which one you're being. Fixblor (talk) 08:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please weigh in on Talk:List of The Simpsons Treehouse of Horror episodes#Inclusion of episode segment links, so we can generate a consensus. Thanks, Fixblor (talk) 09:27, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert List of Stanley Cup champions ? This link was dead.

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Long Point Marsh.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 16:10, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The 2010 WikiCup is over! It has been a long journey, but what has been achieved is impressive: combined, participants have produced over seventy featured articles, over five hundred good articles, over fifty featured lists, over one thousand one hundred "did you know" entries, in addition to various other pieces of recognised content. A full list (which has yet to be updated to reflect the scores in the final round) can be found here. Perhaps more importantly, we have our winner! The 2010 WikiCup champion is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), with an unbelievable 4220 points in the final round. Second place goes to TonyTheTiger (submissions), with 2260, and third to Casliber (submissions), with 560. Congratulations to our other four finalists – White Shadows (submissions), William S. Saturn (submissions), Staxringold (submissions) and ThinkBlue (submissions). Also, congratulations to Sasata (submissions), who withdrew from the competition with an impressive 2685 points earlier in this round.

Prizes will also be going to those who claimed the most points for different types of content in a single round. It was decided that the prizes would be awarded for those with the highest in a round, rather than overall, so that the finalists did not have an unfair advantage. Winning the featured article prize is Casliber (submissions), for five featured articles in round 4. Winning the good article prize is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), for eighty-one good articles in round 5. Winning the featured list prize is Staxringold (submissions), for six featured lists in round 1. Winning the picture and sound award is Jujutacular (submissions), for four featured pictures in round 3. Winning the topic award is Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), for forty-seven articles in various good topics in round 5. Winning the "did you know" award is TonyTheTiger (submissions), for over one hundred did you knows is round 5. Finally, winning the in the news award is Candlewicke (submissions), for nineteen articles in the news in round three.

The WikiCup has faced criticism in the last month – hopefully, we will take something positive from it and create a better contest for next year. Like Wikipedia itself, the Cup is a work in progress, and ideas for how it should work are more than welcome on the WikiCup talk page and on the scoring talk page. Also, people are more than welcome to sign up for next year's competition on the signup page. Well done and thank you to everyone involved – the Cup has been a pleasure to run, and we, as judges, have been proud to be a part of it. We hope that next year, however the Cup is working, and whoever is running it, it will be back, stronger and more popular than ever. Until then, goodbye and happy editing! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 03:11, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The WikiCup 2010 Ribbon of Participation
		Awarded to Scorpion0422, for participation in the 2010 WikiCup. J Milburn, Fox and The ed17 08:59, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's from a blog http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/inmarin/detail?entry_id=72707

-Frenzy- (talk) 23:44, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Recently I noticed on a The Simpsons episode that some nerds were using computers with two bites taken from an apple. The only thing I could find was a Wikia entry, whatever that means, stating this was the Mapple logo. Mapple appears in the episode Mypods and Boomsticks, and while I haven't seen that one in awhile, I concluded that one would see this logo merely by watching the episode. Wikipedia apparently has nothing else about this, but it should.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:48, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One possibility is Products produced from The Simpsons, but it doesn't include Mapple and I'm kind of reluctant to be the one to add it. I'm no expert. If Mapple was there, surely its logo would be worth mentioning as well.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 19:27, 4 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the heads up. I likely won't get involved in the GAR though. It's clearly not ready for GA status, and I'm sure the reassessment process will affirm that. Seems like the user means well though. — Hunter Kahn 00:06, 5 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Laurier Golden Hawks - 2005 Vanier Cup champions.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have nominated List of Survivor contestants for featured list removal here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured list criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks; editors may declare to "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:16, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion about longevity WP:COI has been initiated at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject World's Oldest People#End COI. As a recent contributor to this page, your comments are solicited. JJB 20:25, 11 November 2010 (UTC)

		The Original Barnstar
		Too often great editors like you are overlooked and not given the credit deserved for all their great contributions. So I am awarding you this barnstar to let you know I greatly appreciate all you do for Wikipedia, and please keep up the outstanding work!! CTJF83 chat 03:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have created because the characters were on the list of recurring characters, and as I had a very large size, I've created to put the characters there._{HeinzDoofenshmirtz} —Preceding undated comment added 21:05, 21 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

With everything I've worked to change the characters in place and giving space on the page of recurring characters from The Simpsons, I feel bad that I erased it all. I just try to improve the pages._{HeinzDoofenshmirtz} —Preceding undated comment added 21:23, 21 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Why did you delete everything I do? Tell me what I'm doing wrong, because I do not see to do something so as to delete--HeinzDoofenshmirtz (talk) 07:29, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. But anyway I have a Jack Larson and Princess Kashmir in the page of media personalities, as I believe they are characters in that category--HeinzDoofenshmirtz (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's a shame they had to move, but that skin is so much nicer. Anyway, yeah, I've kinda been out of this ever since I got to uni, because there's literally no time to edit anything... Oh well. But yeah, (if you have time) can I send you the transcript of Bill's interview to clean up and upload? Because I'm never going to get around to doing it. Gran² 21:53, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, so I just suppressed that edit you made while logged out, but per WP:3RR, you're done on that article for the moment. Final warn an' all that ... - Alison ^❤ 00:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The information table about number of cups hosted per city is relevant and not redundant. The information is included in the table with numbers, but the list of Grey Cups is over 100 rows long. This table is a quick reference and show clearly the distribution of cup games. The scoring records are again derived from the table and are useful because they serve as a quick reference. The Win/Loss tables contain information that is contained in the table too and you don't delete that table. If you don't think the information tables are pertinent to this specific page then create a new one rather than just deleting them. The page may be called List of Grey Cup Champions, but the list itself is a list of dates, champions, losers, scores, stadiums, cities.Donutcity (talk) 10:55, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I do not think a redirect is necessary here, we have one compeitor by name qualified, and qualfication picks up in 2011, so the article should be left as it is. Intoronto1125 (talk) 16:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know that was directed at me, so I'll just say, the ONLY reason I did anything at all with List of The Simpsons episodes this morning is to revert THIS EDIT, the same edit with a different number which we truly have no confirmation for, and prevent it from happening again. At least I had a source for mine, and if left in, it would have ended the matter once and for all. Without it, well, how long have you been editing this page? I've been here long enough to know that some IP is always going to fill in empty spaces and question marks. I didn't cause the problem; I offered a solution to it. The only thing that may have been changed by my contribution is the number they're filling in. KnownAlias contact 23:46, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Treehouse of Horror IX you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Treehouse of Horror IX for eventual comments about the article. Well done! Admrboltz (talk) 03:21, 12 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

In the future please do not delete the Cultural references for this article, If you look almost 95 percent of The Simpsons episode articles include Cultural references, if you feel that it should not be included then please go to the talk page and discuss it first. If you continue to delete without giving a good and valid reason you could end up being banned from editing which is something I don't really like to see happen to Wikipedians. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. 3littlemaidsfromschool (talk) 01:20, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I must agree with 3littlemaidsfromschool. Please explain any removal of content in your edit summary. Thanks. Guoguo12--Talk--  01:23, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Guoguo12--Talk--  19:43, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied at the above link. Guoguo12--Talk--  22:54, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've started a discussion about your recent deletion of information about Peace Prize recipients who were assassinated or died in custody here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:List_of_Nobel_Peace_Prize_laureates#Peace_Prize_recipients_who_were_assassinated_or_who_died_in_custody Ghostofnemo (talk) 01:21, 15 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I'm not trying to be difficult - it does seem odd, however, not to have a photo of the current winner of the trophy in the article on the basis that the article is "full". It's not readily apparent that the photos in the latter section are only of those who have won the award numerous times, but I'll defer to you on that. In fact, I defer to your judgment as to where you think Votto's photo best goes - you might prefer to keep Gretzky at the top, and that might be best - I am sure Votto can be accommodate elsewhere in the article. I'll leave it in your hands.--Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:11, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then place it where you think it should go, rather than deleting it and saying the article is full. It's not surprising you face this issue all the time. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:41, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And please try and restrain from using snarky comments like the "Votto fan club" in your edit comments. I didn't even know who Votto was until a few days ago. You don't have a monopoly on the desire to see the best article possible. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 17:43, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, there's an IP who wishes to break out the people who medically left or quit. You might want to join in on the discussion since that would be a major change to the format of list. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:41, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Scorpion. I have placed Lists of World Wrestling Entertainment champions up for FTCR. Please comment here. GamerPro64 (talk) 20:41, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]