Your recent article submission has been rejected and cannot be resubmitted. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Grahaml35 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: After a search there is no WP:SIGCOV to show notability.

Grahaml35 (talk) 21:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Samboadu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Grahaml35 (talk) 21:44, 24 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Clove, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ... and other articles. You are promoting your own spam website. Reporting you to admin. Zefr (talk) 21:10, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am very new here and i just got started so calling my website a spam i think is a bit harsh.. its obvious i am new and i do much of blogging so i thought it wise to add both old and new articles from my blogs to add value or information to the wikipedia pages.. Clove blog is never promotional and if it is seen as such then that is fine.. i believe a warning should be issued first, a bit of training should be given to me and then if i repeat, my websites or account can be blocked Samboadu (talk) 22:51, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines.

If you believe that there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 21:45, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am very new here and i just got started so calling my website a spam i think is a bit harsh.. its obvious i am new and i do much of blogging so i thought it wise to add both old and new articles from my blogs to add value or information to the wikipedia pages.. Clove blog is never promotional and if it is seen as such then that is fine.. i believe a warning should be issued first, a bit of training should be given to me and then if i repeat, my websites or account can be blocked Samboadu (talk) 22:51, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Samboadu (talk) 07:58, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I am very new here and i just got started so calling my website a spam i think is a bit harsh.. its obvious i am new and i do much of blogging so i thought it wise to add both old and new articles from my blogs to add value or information to the wikipedia pages.. Clove blog is never promotional and if it is seen as such then that is fine.. i believe a warning should be issued first, a bit of training should be given to me and then if i repeat, my websites or account can be blocked Samboadu (talk) 08:00, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]